| ▲ | Forgeties79 8 hours ago | |||||||
Everybody with a silicon Mac can easily run a small parameter LLM. Smartphones can run small ones too. Plenty of windows machines are capable too. We know with populations of a certain size, any barrier is going to cause people to drop off. We see it over and over again. Why is this going to be any different? The more technical it feels, the more impenetrable it feels, so people will simply turn to ChatGPT or anthropic or whoever and pay them a subscription. Is that what we want? Like what are you even arguing with me about? | ||||||||
| ▲ | jack_pp 8 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
this is a thread about reverse engineering, to my knowledge small parameter LLMs are not going to give you much help with this. who cares about novelty LLMs? > We know with populations of a certain size, any barrier is going to cause people to drop off but the population size of people who will self host is not large. > The more technical it feels, the more impenetrable it feels you have to be inherently technical to even consider the option to run locally no matter how easy. what would a non technical person even use a local LLM for, that they wouldn't want to do with CGPT or ANT? also, even considering reverse engineering any software at all requires technical knowledge. 99% of lay people don't even know it's an option let alone start vibe coding a RE on a local LLM | ||||||||
| ||||||||