| ▲ | chasil a day ago |
| HP never really recovered from the loss of Mark Hurd, so I can see the logic of this sentiment. https://knowledge.insead.edu/leadership-organisations/mark-h... However, if Jensen Huang was made aware of the potential for espionage, then his position is far more precarious. https://techcrunch.com/2026/11/09/the-race-is-on-to-sue-nvid... "A third category, one that would change everything, would arise only if the board’s investigation finds Huang knew about the intelligence connection. That would be “a whole other ball game,” as Bartlett said." I have signed on to the Rosen class action. |
|
| ▲ | throw0101c 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > However, if Jensen Huang was made aware of the potential for espionage, then his position is far more precarious. What he made aware of circumventing export controls? |
|
| ▲ | zmgsabst a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People are questioning if the affairs being pressured now are a form of parallel construction: US IC knows he knew, but cannot disclose the means at trial, so they’re doing this to remove him from NVidia. |
| |
| ▲ | K0balt 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It seems fairly clear to me that this is the case. His misstep was political in nature, I think , or maybe the Chinese chip wagon train. But the affairs are neither relevant nor noteworthy except as an excuse for the resignation. NVIDIA is a strategic national asset at this point. | | |
| ▲ | b112 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | An alternate could be, that the entire goal of all of this was because the Chinese government wanted to remove a highly effective CEO, from producing what is now a worldwide grip on top level AI compute power. | | | |
| ▲ | bbor 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’re disagreeing with the person you’re responding to, btw. | | |
| ▲ | K0balt 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | Huh, it seems I’m agreeing with them to me? Am I losing it, at long last? Op says the affairs are parallel construction and I’m saying that I doubt that the affairs are the base motivation? | | |
| |
| ▲ | actionfromafar 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a high dimensional space :) A: legality B: morality C: what the political power wants D: what shareholders wants E: what the "CIA" wants, which is influenced by A, B and C, and D but its own thing ... Z: business consequences, the sum of all of the above | |
| ▲ | jasonm23 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd suggesting a quick review of the potential "replacement CEO" candidates, and things get interesting. | | |
| |
| ▲ | vasco a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is the likeliest explanation. The reason might be another but this is clearly him being put aside without having to do it right. | | |
| ▲ | estearum a day ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | thaumasiotes a day ago | parent [-] | | > Drats if only the weasely SEE EYE AYE didn’t force him to sleep with a (potential) foreign agent You know that AYE rhymes with EYE, right? | | |
| ▲ | estearum a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes but I couldn’t figure out a better way to write it. Any suggestions? “Eh” doesn’t sound right either. | | | |
| ▲ | zakki 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah, you meant CIA. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | chasil a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I will admit, that does sound plausible. |
|
|
| ▲ | wolvoleo a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Still, just sleeping with someone doesn't mean you share secrets with them. I've slept with people I wouldn't even allow to look at my phone lol |
