| ▲ | zmgsabst a day ago |
| People are questioning if the affairs being pressured now are a form of parallel construction: US IC knows he knew, but cannot disclose the means at trial, so they’re doing this to remove him from NVidia. |
|
| ▲ | K0balt 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It seems fairly clear to me that this is the case. His misstep was political in nature, I think , or maybe the Chinese chip wagon train. But the affairs are neither relevant nor noteworthy except as an excuse for the resignation. NVIDIA is a strategic national asset at this point. |
| |
| ▲ | b112 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | An alternate could be, that the entire goal of all of this was because the Chinese government wanted to remove a highly effective CEO, from producing what is now a worldwide grip on top level AI compute power. | | | |
| ▲ | bbor 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’re disagreeing with the person you’re responding to, btw. | | |
| ▲ | K0balt 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | Huh, it seems I’m agreeing with them to me? Am I losing it, at long last? Op says the affairs are parallel construction and I’m saying that I doubt that the affairs are the base motivation? | | |
| |
| ▲ | actionfromafar 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a high dimensional space :) A: legality B: morality C: what the political power wants D: what shareholders wants E: what the "CIA" wants, which is influenced by A, B and C, and D but its own thing ... Z: business consequences, the sum of all of the above | |
| ▲ | jasonm23 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd suggesting a quick review of the potential "replacement CEO" candidates, and things get interesting. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | vasco a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is the likeliest explanation. The reason might be another but this is clearly him being put aside without having to do it right. |
| |
| ▲ | estearum a day ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | thaumasiotes a day ago | parent [-] | | > Drats if only the weasely SEE EYE AYE didn’t force him to sleep with a (potential) foreign agent You know that AYE rhymes with EYE, right? | | |
| ▲ | estearum a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes but I couldn’t figure out a better way to write it. Any suggestions? “Eh” doesn’t sound right either. | | | |
| ▲ | zakki 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah, you meant CIA. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | chasil a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I will admit, that does sound plausible. |
