| ▲ | bragr 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I started to think about this like physical locks and that made it seem less weird. You don't need a great lock to communicate "this is a private space" and there's no "but your honor is was a crappy lock" defense to trespassing. Circumventing bad copy protection still establishes intent to circumvent so you're still in trouble. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gizmo686 a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notably, neither lockpicks nor lockpicks are illegal. By making circumvention itself illegal the DMCA gives the producer to essentially invent new IP law. Want to take a DVD you bought while vacationing in China and play it back home in the US. That is perfectly legal. However, if the DVD has even the flimsiest form of region locking, you would need to circumvent them, which is a crime. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||