Sex with spy of country actively tariffed and greatest active threat to US. Billions in tariff bypass. That puts you in jail for decades territory. People magazine cares about who he is banging. Legal and possible company nationalization care about bypassing tariffs.

▲

15155 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Tariffs are for imported goods, and export tariffs are unconstitutional in the United States. The monetary value of whatever transaction in question here is completely irrelevant.

This is an export security violation. Still criminal, but not tax evasion or anything like it, and the monetary value holds no legal relevance - the number of articles themselves does.

▲

NetMageSCW a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sex with a spy isn’t relevant any more than it was to Congress because you can’t prove it was knowingly.

	▲	elictronic a day ago \| parent [-]
		Selling chips to China is pretty easily provable. Who cares what pussy he is diddling, it matters that such a large company might have their assets seized due to such blatant shenanigans.

▲

Eridanus2 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Did you mean rationalization?

	▲	elictronic a day ago \| parent [-]
		No. If Nvidia's leadership is incapable of abiding by US law they could have their company and assets seized. National defense makes this a much bigger deal than people seem to understand.