Remix.run Logo
▲ jareklupinski 12 hours ago

> being able to stay out a bit longer, solve sudden problems without calling mom, or just sit alone

none of these are prevented when you have an airtag in your pocket

my hesitation is from knowing these _dont_ work: by the time airtag shows where someone actually is that isnt a 500m circle, you can see them with your analog eyes :/

▲trashb 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> none of these are prevented when you have an airtag in your pocket.

Technically true. However I think there is a very small percentage of parents that can keep themselves from interrupting in such a situation. Actually I think it leads to a slippery slope situation (the article calls it a downward spiral) where the interruptions will be easier to make the more you do it as a parent. The only question remaining is how high up the slope do you start and how fast do you slip?

▲embedding-shape 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> none of these are prevented when you have an airtag in your pocket

When I was about 8 years old I was allowed to go with the bus by myself between my mom and my dad.

I can remember two times I fell asleep on the bus, and ended up some other place, and had to figure out how to get home from there, by myself.

I'm sure of the technology was available at the time, my mom would have placed an airtag on me, and without a doubt, would have seen me miss my bus-stop and jumped into her car to pick me up wherever I ended up. Bless her heart, but I'd miss the opportunity of figuring it out by myself.

Of course, just one silly example, but I could see if this was constantly happening, a child might get accustomed to this "saving" being automatic, and not even trying to solve things yourself because you know your parent will come save the day. Until they don't, of course.

▲jareklupinski 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> I can remember two times I fell asleep on the bus, and ended up some other place, and had to figure out how to get home from there, by myself.

if it involved asking a business (car service in my case) to let you use their phone, or already having a quarter and using a payphone to call mom... thats an airtag :)

> a child might get accustomed to this "saving" being automatic

i dont fear a perfectly functioning society; im an adult and am also used to 911/999/etc being available. some people watch Demolition Man and get the wrong idea...

▲thereader12 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is not an airtag. The payphone doesn't use a network of snitches to say where you are at all times. It is really bad to instill the idea that you are never private, it makes our surveillance situation worse and more accepted. Which i am sure hackernews and the EFF have plenty of articles to show why normal people need privacy.

▲blitzar 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> having a quarter and using a payphone to call mom

I had enough coins for 2 phone calls in a sealed envelope in my school bag for emergencies - probably still in the bottom of my bag wherever it may be.

▲dahart 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> that’s an airtag

How so? Mom has no way to know where you are until you initiate the call. Isn’t a big part of the developmental point to have kids recognize they’re lost on their own and then ask for help from a friendly stranger? What’s the ‘no airtag’ scenario you imagine?

▲mschuster91 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> if it involved asking a business (car service in my case) to let you use their phone, or already having a quarter and using a payphone to call mom... thats an airtag :)

No. An airtag works for your mom no matter if you want it or not, some payphone on the street places the agency about calling help into your hands.

▲htrp 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

already a thing.... look at the problem solving skills of some of the fresh grads

▲paganel 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> none of these are prevented when you have an airtag in your pocket

It instills a Panopticum-like philosophy in said kids since their very early ages, meaning they become aware that they're being watched at every moment of their lives. In my opinion that does affect said kids' future look on life (once they will have become adults, that is).

▲graemep 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, it normalises surveillance.

▲jareklupinski 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> It instills a Panopticum-like philosophy in said kids since their very early ages

Santa Claus has been around since before airtags; you dont need technology to make kids fearful of invisible retribution, just a clever song ("he sees you when youre sleeping, he knows when youre awake")

▲r_lee 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

that only works for very vey very young kids.

I dont get your point

▲germinalphrase 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We’ve strip-mined every cultural superstition and monster for the entertainment industry, but those superstitions and monsters often existed - even in the minds of adults - to warn against certain behaviors, actions or locations.

▲watwut 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And only on christmas day. They dont think long term, no getting christmas gifts is not a treat in november - it is infinetely far for a small kid.

▲kelseyfrog 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Santa Claus for the very young; an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent God for everyone else.

We have at least a several thousand year history of instilling a 'Panopticum[sic][1]-like psychology' in enormous swaths of society. More of the same.

1. please tell me this is a typo

▲graemep 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If that was so people who were more religious would be more accepting of surveillance and I do not think that is the case.

God is also perfectly good, outside time, unlikely to question your actions, and completely forgiving. Rather different from being watched by human beings.

I do not think belief divine omniscience by itself had much impact on people's behaviour.

▲kelseyfrog an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Why would a religious person, holding a sincere belief their actions cannot be hidden, want more surveillance? It would be redundant, no? Maybe they can chime in and resolve it. Best to hear from a source directly.

▲ 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲tavavex 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's true that the idea of 'someone is watching you' is very old and a well-tested method of social control. The religious angle may be why so many people are receptive to mass surveillance today. But not everyone is religious, and those that are rarely live with a true, 24/7 feeling of dread and fear that someone is actually watching. The fear of consequences is very distant, and there is often forgiveness for small infractions. That fear becomes very different when you can put a face and a name to the people watching you, and you know they can affect your life in very real and immediate ways. This is the preconditioning that starts with childhood surveillance.

▲kelseyfrog 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I've spoken to many of the deconverted who where genuinely afraid of committing real and mental sins as a direct condition of omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence. Have you not met someone like this?

▲thin_carapace 2 hours ago | parent [-]

are u saying that people shouldn't be afraid of the consequences of behaving improperly ?

▲kelseyfrog an hour ago | parent [-]

I'm saying, in response to "The fear of consequences is very distant, and there is often forgiveness for small infractions," that people do have a fear of misbehaving and a belief in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent god is a critical component of a 'feeling that someone is always watching' resulting in that fear and subsequent avoidance.

▲thin_carapace 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

certainly proponents of surveillance capitalism would argue that the brain must percieve a social slight in the same way it percieves a slight against god. i can imagine some of these types whispering morpheus quotes to themselves in bed. "the need to be observed and understood was once satisfied by god ..."

▲pantalaimon 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Soon we'll all be watched over by machines of loving grace.

▲41353aab 10 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

▲amenhotep 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not "everyone" else though is it. Especially not in the recent decades where this surveillance has become a real thing.

▲kelseyfrog 9 hours ago | parent [-]

What does that have to do with the subject of discussion: instilling a Panopticum[sic]-like philosophy in said kids since their very early ages?

▲iamnothere 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Most kids have an important developmental moment where they realize Santa isn’t real

▲giardini 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, but then there's religion with an all-viewing God or gods. And years of these ideas repeated never really goes away. After all, what if there really IS a God, or Vishnu, or Allah, and a Hell, etc.! The very idea is enough to drive a kid to Pascal's wager.

▲iamnothere 5 hours ago | parent [-]

There’s many people who don’t believe in either Santa or god. Only about half of younger people believe in hell in the US.

Unfortunately, even those who escape such beliefs now have to face the reality of surveillance not by gods, but by men, many of whom don’t have your best interest in mind.

▲41353aab 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲usrnm 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> none of these are prevented when you have an airtag in your pocket

Do you want to install an app on your phone that will track you and your online activities for the government? They won't interfere, they just want to know what you're up to and help. Children are people and want some privacy too. I know I did.

▲4bpp 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Presumably, when this generation comes of age they will largely answer this question with "sure, I don't see the problem", which many will consider a big win.

▲deadbabe 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

AirTag showed a mom her kid was in a lake, she made a big scene, frantically calling 911. Kid was not in the lake.