No one raise kangaroos here, they raise themselves: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YzzXsTF25Qk (black dots on ground are kangaroo poo)

So yes, you're correct - I'm not raising roos in Scotland, but we do look into ruminants, biomes, etc here.

These are complex chains that make up the surface level carbon cycle. Not every path leads to carbon dioxide / methane production, the gas creation ratios can be tweaked by the paths taken.

The problematic carbons are those that are additional - those once buried across the course of millions of years, some millions of years ago and now being bought to the surface in an extremely short timescale (one century and half, roughly)

This all goes to your question if you care to look into it.

> No one raise kangaroos here, they raise themselves…

In Scotland?

> The problematic carbons are those that are additional - those once buried across the course of millions of years, some millions of years ago and now being bought to the surface in an extremely short timescale (one century and half, roughly)

Meat production accounts for somewhere between 15 and 20% of human emissions. It is a significant part of the problem.

> the gas creation ratios can be tweaked by the paths taken.

To a point. Producing and consuming meat is gonna emit carbon. This isn’t disputable.