>lash out indiscriminately

Discrimination is a fallacious argument, if this is indeed an Iranian action, since Iran has been the target of a great number of indiscriminate attacks from the NATO bloc, including cyber attacks on its own food systems, also.

>Iran's strategy

I'm curious how you learn of Iran's strategy?

▲

bawolff 2 hours ago | parent [-]

"lash out indiscriminately" is a criticism of their strategy. Not an argument over if it is ethical or who deserves what.

Going all, two wrongs make a right, misses the point. We aren't debating who is right but if iran's actions are likely to lead to them winning.

	▲	MomsAVoxell an hour ago \| parent [-]
		If it were a lash, it would not be necessarily targeting specific infrastructure, no? Indiscriminately - I suppose you mean "not attacking only military targets" - well I don't mean it from ethical stance, but rather the nature of tit for tat warfare, which is what this is. >winning Yeah, lost me there.