"lash out indiscriminately" is a criticism of their strategy. Not an argument over if it is ethical or who deserves what.

Going all, two wrongs make a right, misses the point. We aren't debating who is right but if iran's actions are likely to lead to them winning.

If it were a lash, it would not be necessarily targeting specific infrastructure, no?

Indiscriminately - I suppose you mean "not attacking only military targets" - well I don't mean it from ethical stance, but rather the nature of tit for tat warfare, which is what this is.

>winning

Yeah, lost me there.