|
| ▲ | fhdkweig 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I agree with your sentiment, but something this big should have been run through a committee of not-yes-men before publishing. I feel like honest feedback would have stopped this. |
| |
| ▲ | whoanoway 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | andai 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And then it would have been as lame as every other document, and we wouldn't be talking about it. | | |
| ▲ | fhdkweig 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I know there are people who believe there is no such thing as bad publicity and that it is better to be remembered as a monster than forgotten, but not me. | | | |
| ▲ | skeeter2020 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | this is not yet another document, rather a contract with all the legal baggage that comes along with that - like this lawsuit. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | watwut 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That is not true. Other people can have good ideas, bad ideas, kind of bad ideas, very bad ideas, terrible ideas and off the chart stupid ideas. So, no the comment is not tantamount to saying "I disagree with these ideas". It is possible to disagree with an idea that is not horribly bad. It is possible to disagree with an idea that is quite smart, just with a trade off I dont prefer. |
| |
| ▲ | ETH_start 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Would you say there's a correlation between how strongly you disagree with an idea and how terrible that idea is? | | |
| ▲ | skeeter2020 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you equate terrible with bad. Since most ideas at the far end of the scale are both emotional and the means to an outcome you feel very strongly about, yes, |
|
|
