Remix.run Logo
▲ steveBK123 8 hours ago

If you had to follow a bank's strategy on basically anything, would you follow Goldman or Barclays?

▲sourdecor 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well the real question is: Is this about using AI, or switching from public AI to private AI, or about Anthropic having access to confidential information of their own underwriter?

▲ 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
▲xnickb 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If only there was a way to find out what the linked article is about. I'll go ask Claud if there are any ways to do that.

▲jbs789 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Look no further than the recent email leak story. The tool is quite powerful and I can see the argument that at an enterprise / risk management level it should only be used by those capable of reviewing it.

▲schrodinger 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Goldman any day, if you're asking based on their respective reputations.

▲octo888 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They've been in business longer than the USA's existence, they must be doing something right - some 336 years.

The UK is very good at banking.

▲throwaway2037 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Uhh... colonial empire? See also: HSBC and Standard Chartered. For those unaware, one of France's largest banks, BNP Paribas is also an old colonial bank from... wait for it... Netherlands! Paribas stands for "Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas". For those unaware, the old French term for the Netherlands (Holland) is the low countries, which is literally "Pays-Bas" in French.

To be fair, UK's #1 talent and economic advantage for global commerce in 2026 is their contract law and the courts that judicate it. It is unmatched globally. Sure, New York, Paris, Tokyo, Hongkong, and Singapore are pretty big, but nothing competes with London for international contract law. The ecosystem is just so massive and concentrated in London -- courts, highly experienced judges/barristers (lawyers)/academics.

▲1718627440 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> For those unaware, the old French term for the Netherlands (Holland) is the low countries, which is literally "Pays-Bas" in French.

"Netherlands" still means "low countries".

▲octo888 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know what it means. I'll be honest, I don't think anyone knows what it means anymore. Scholars maintain that the translation was lost hundreds of years ago

▲1718627440 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What do you mean by that? https://nl-en.dict.cc/?s=neder https://nl-en.dict.cc/?s=nederig

▲master_crab 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe not Goldman.

But DEFINITELY NOT Barclays.

▲steveBK123 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Right if you had to pick a big bank that didn't die in 2008 but nonetheless should not be followed on anything.. Barclays is top 3 for sure.

▲HFguy 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Deutsche Bank is number one this list.

▲weakened_malloc 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

DB failed upwards. They couldn't fail, they were far more systemically important than Lehman or Bear.

▲master_crab 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, that’s implied

▲steveBK123 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

LOL yeah.. I mean.. yeah.

▲piker 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Better not ask that question to Merrill Lynch circa 2006