I've heard so much about how prediction markets are the guiding light in this dark world. But when put head to head against polls or Nate Silver's FLIPR model, they are really a wash. Especially looking at flipped or close-by-polls races, there is no alpha compared to a traditional poll-based model. Was this obvious to everyone else too? Can we treat them like the entertainment they are and tax them for the terrible ads?

We should permanently rename "prediction markets" to "betting markets".

People linked to them came up with the "prediction" nonsense to sound modern and technological as a way to dissociate themselves from the life/family destroying gambling of old.

But they are gambling, pure and simple, with no value to society.

What’s with the mouse cursors? I can barely read this on mobile because it’s covered with “guest” pointers

I really think the main factor in determining if prediction markets are valuable is their predictions from outside election day. Once the “blue tsunami” was “expected” most of the markets shot overwhelmingly in one direction as the night wrapped up. You need to have a boundary for comparison that isn’t influenced by election night. Starting at 5AM is a decent cut point but I would argue the final poll date is the best comparison.

Love or hate PolyMarket, it should be on this list too.

Neat idea, thanks. Why show the cursors on here? I found them somewhat distracting and am not sure what purpose they're serving.

I agree this is unreadable

Unreadable

>I've heard so much about how prediction markets are the guiding light in this dark world.

Who are these people?

Seems like someone is trolling hn, holy moly that web design

I mean, if we look at this another way:

  Number of errors with the polls: 30
  Number of errors with Kalshi: 25
  
  Error reduction: 16%

> Either over a long time scale, a prediction market will always be at least as good as the best expert, authoritative organization, or other information source. Or you can get rich quick.

[1]: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/prediction-market-faq

I flagged and killed it, because of the dumb cursors.

>But when put head to head against polls or Nate Silver's FLIPR model, they are really a wash

I'm actually not a fan of prediction markets for reasons.

But, them being "a wash" with fancy-pants models and expensive, not super-efficient polling processes is actually pretty remarkable.

what are people suggesting is the "right" way for prediction markets to indicate that they are accurate? what should prediction market prices be if they are predicting accurately?

if you can predict accurately, you will win all your plays. If who you are predicting is the favorite, and the favorite wins, you will earn less money than if you can predict the upsets. That's what the markets do, you do the predicting, the market rewards you.