Remix.run Logo
▲ brightball 9 hours ago

After Helene knocked out power in parts of my area for a little over 14 days, I found out that a friend of ours used his cybertruck to power his house through the entire mess. He'd run the house on it for a couple of days, then drive the cybertruck over to a super charger station, recharge, then come home and plug the house back in.

The battery capacity on those things is equivalent to 9 Tesla Powerwall units or something close to it.

They may be ugly, but the emergency prepper in me always wanted one after hearing that story. Before, I always wanted to install powerwalls...but I never considered in an extended event being able to drive my powerwalls somewhere to recharge them.

▲rurp 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This seems like an awfully niche case, no? How often does someone lose power at home for days, while also having a nearby and accessible charging station that stays functional the whole time? Most of the disasters I'm aware of people either get their power back in a short enough amount of time that they can use a normal generator for the gap, or things are bad and widespread enough that they aren't driving down the street to recharge their vehicle.

▲masklinn 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Also very important: the cybertruck is not the only vehicle capable of doing that (the keywords are V2H and V2L, V2H is the more convenient — the car just plugs into the mains and acts as a house battery — while V2L means you have to go and plug your stuff to the car's mains outputs directly)

> Most of the disasters I'm aware of people either get their power back in a short enough amount of time that they can use a normal generator for the gap

TBF an EV car has an absolutely massive battery relative to the electric consumption of a house, unless you're using resistive heating all around. Especially if you ration use.

▲jayknight 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Here's Alex from Technology Connections testing powering things in his house from his Hyundai Ioniq 5.

https://youtu.be/yO5fJ8z66Z8

▲anthomtb 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I live in an area prone to high winds and we occasionally have pre-planned power shutdowns (I think PSPS is the term).

My Ioniq 5 has been a godsend. No, it can't power the house without dorking around with my electrical panel. But we can run the fridge, dishwasher, a few standing lights and keep phones and computers full charged.

I used a similar setup to Alex's but with the outlet in the rear seat instead of the V2X connector. I will probably by the V2X connector since it supposedly hanldles higher power draw.

▲cachius 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Is that the new PlayStation?

▲manmal 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We have a heat pump with SOCP 5, but are still using 30kWh per day now.

▲zeeveener 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

On most modern EVs, that's at least 3 days worth of power if the vehicle is not being driven. Larger vehicles naturally have far larger batteries.

▲darkwater 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Mmmh no? 90kWh battery packs are not that common. An M3 or MY LR AWD have an 82kWh. Some Mercedes and some Chinese model have a 100+kWh battery but the most common setup is between 60 and 70.

Anyway I agree that in emergency conditions it can go a looong way for a house.

▲masklinn 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's 2-3 days worth without changing your use pattern, which surely you would do if you expected a long blackout period?

▲pmontra 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is that 30 kW each hour of the day or 30 kW per day?

▲alex43578 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

30 kWh per day, while a clunky unit, is what most people would understand when talking about home consumption. It’ll be what their utility typically reports, how you’d want to size a battery, etc.

▲gertrunde 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sort of neither?

It's 30kW for one hour.

(Or 1.25kW for 24 hours, or however you prefer).

[Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt-hour]

▲numpad0 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's like you had a faucet with cross section of 2 square inches, and 15 seconds with that faucet wide open would fill a jug. That jug holds 30 squareinches-seconds of water.

You may then use that water over the course of a day. That's 30 sqin-sec per day. That is not 30 square inches for a whole day. It's second per day.

Or watt hour per week or whatever.

Yes, it can be described like 0.00034722 sqin/day, and that corresponds to no physical object and that would be largely useless.

Why not Joules or Liters? Because that's complicated for anything electrical.

▲OJFord 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Pretty sure GP understands that, their point being you can't just wave away 'per unit time' when talking about it relative to generation, it matters.

▲buran77 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"30kW per day" makes no sense. It's like saying "100km/h per day". W is a unit of power, Wh is a unit of energy.

It's unintuitive because a guy named Watt decided "Joule per second" is Watt, so the intuitive units Joule and Joule per second got turned on their head to W times hour and Watt. This is opposite to usual intuition of distance and speed for example, km and km/h. If I redefined the km/h to a "tick", then a km would become "tick times hour".

If you want a "better than nothing" but imperfect analogy, Wh is how much water you have in a bottle, and W is how quickly you can get the water out.

▲SamBam 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"30kWh per day" isn't waving away anything.

30kW is a rate.

30kWh is a measure of energy, about 100MJ.

30kWh/day is a rate again, 100MJ/day.

It seems clunky, but it's a way energy usage in a house is typically measured.

▲ 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲tdhz77 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As soon as the Rivian has v2h I will buy

▲harikb 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The value of a used 24 KWh battery used in, say, an old EV non-tesla car - $2000 (note this still has plenty of life left). Example: a 2013 Nissan Leaf

The value of the same, repurposed to a "powerwall" - $10k per 10 KWh

The value of it once attached to a "movable powerwall" - :) add a few more zeros

Clearly, I am in the wrong business...

▲alex43578 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You can get good batteries for a lot cheaper than a power wall. Just like when the Tesla family of companies tried to do home solar - big premium for the name.

▲lostlogin 4 hours ago | parent [-]

This puzzles me.

When we got solar we asked for quotes, but ‘No Tesla’. The sales rep said ‘We get that a lot’.

▲wlesieutre 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I knew a guy with a Tesla solar system and his advice was also “no Tesla”

▲chadash 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Most people (like me) don't have generators. But when I hear "oh, BTW this car can be a used as a generator for 48-72 hours in a power outage", that's a nice little selling point that might put me over the edge if i'm otherwise considering the car. No, this doesn't solve for Hurricane Katrina. But it does solve for a nor'easter.

▲petcat 6 hours ago | parent [-]

My car is basically one big gas-powered generator that has the benefit of also not requiring a functional power station to refill itself.

It has other downsides, obviously. But the notion of "emergency power for your house" isn't really anything special.

▲aftbit 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It probably does though, unless you have stockpiled gas. If the power is down to the gas station, the pumps don't work.

My experience with power outages (after big summer storms, not a hurricane thank goodness) has been that my neighborhood is impacted, but that places nearby have power. They tend to restore commercial first, so the supercharger near me is up and running before my house.

▲sumeno 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If the power is down to the charging station the chargers don't work, this is just as likely as the power being down at the gas station

▲labcomputer 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Let me know when you figure out how to refill your gas car from solar panels.

▲solyin 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I know you're being snarky, but the chemical process for that exists! It's called the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. You take air, CO2 specifically, and then run the process, which needs electricity, possibly from solar panels, and get diesel/gasoline/jet fuel out the other end! Isn't science amazing?

There are practical issues with it, but it's possible. The question is EROI or Energy Return on Investment. Do you get more energy from it than it took to make it, which unfortunately is not there yet. Shrinking it down to fit into your backyard is an exercise left for the reader.

▲localhost 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

it is more than possible - this is exactly what casey handmer and his startup terraform industries is doing in a pilot plant in the desert: https://blog.terraformindustries.com/2026/10/21/terraform-20...

▲marcta 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Hyperspace Pirate tried this at home, and it's horribly inefficient: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRKbjT8AoJw

▲sumeno 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you've got solar panels sufficent to charge a cybertruck then you don't need the cybertruck to power your home. Regular battery systems will work

▲petcat 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Charging an EV from regular household solar panels would take days....

And that's assuming they are sunny days.

▲lostlogin 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It takes about a 6-8 hours to charge my Leaf on a small solar install.

But yes, it needs to be sunny if that’s going to be pure solar.

▲ryanbrunner 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I realize the person you're replying to wasn't specific and said just "EV" but a leaf and a cybertruck are pretty much the polar ends of a spectrum.

▲sveme 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What? My BIL’s installation is small, roughly 8kWp, on sunny days he easily gets 40-50kWh, if not more.

▲rightnutwingjob 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The Cybertruck has a 123kW battery, so charging it would take days, assuming they are sunny days.

▲its_ethan 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

because solar panels only exist on houses?

▲rightnutwingjob 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Because EVs are only powered by solar?

▲its_ethan 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Who said they were?

▲rightnutwingjob 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Let me know when you invent solar panels that aren’t vulnerable to damaging winds.

▲pmontra 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Where I live solar panels have been smashed by hail ice balls, 3 inches diameter.

▲scarecrowbob 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably when they invent a genset that can sustain its surrounding structure being immolated in a wildfire?

I'm 100% off grid on solar in the middle of nowhere. My panels could burn up, get hit by hail, get searched by law enforcement, flooded out, eaten by mice, stolen by miscreants, abducted by aliens or buried in snow. And of course in the event of a volcano they are probably not gonna function well.

So they are of course totally unworkable in events when the power grid is down.

But I like using them and they've been reliable so far...

▲LordDragonfang 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> unless you have stockpiled gas

And are regularly rotating that stockpile, because gasoline has a shelf life measured in months

edit: Apparently this leans more technically-true factoid than fact, thank you replies

▲Ariarule 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You're not wrong but this is commonly exaggerated: half a year with a stabilizer is entirely doable under reasonable conditions.

▲ljf 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Amuses me hear this - I ran a moped from a large tank of multi-year old petrol, and it got by fine. But maybe a modern car might be more picky?

▲ryanbrunner 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We use the (inboard) engine so rarely on my sailboat I'm sure we've gone 2 years on a tank without issue before.

▲lostlogin 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

HN is full of maintenance purists, and I do know I should do better, but... A Corolla will work fine after sitting for a year or so and it’s once-or-twice-per-decade oil change seems to work ok.

▲AngryData 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Unless you are trying to race your car at the drag strip with charged air and hit your best times, that isn't true at all and I don't know why people keep saying it. You think everybody empties their lawn mowers, snow blowers, snowmobiles, generators, etc. every year of gas or before trying to start it up again the next year? No way.

Simpler gas equipment like mowers and generators don't have enough compression to really care about anything but ancient gas, and if you run any vehicle that is multi-fuel capable it can detect and adjust compression based on a fuel's capabilities.

Ive been repairing and fixing junkers of cars, mowers, ATVs, generators, and more for 30 years and not once has bad gas stopped something from running. I only remove it if it was clearly having water raining into the tank. In every other case where I couldn't start something after sitting around for 5+ years, it was from the gas gumming up in the carb or the shitty diaphragm pump, which generally means there is little to no gas left to start with.

I wouldn't even suspect gas of ever being bad unless it was atleast a few years old. If the tank was open it could have evaporated, if the tank was closed it probably ain't great gas but I bet it would still run in anything but a high compression application.

▲dotancohen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> detect and adjust compression based on a fuel's capabilities.

Spark, not compression.

▲xattt 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Ford F150 Powerboost has an optional 7.2 kVA inverter, which I am not sure if there are any other vehicles that can do the same off a gas tank.

I am guessing that one of the use cases is a support unit to charge an EV just enough to get it to a charging station.

▲jethro_tell 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Ford has had options like this forever and it's usually targeted at farmers and ranchers, I think the first I've found was like a 77 or 78 f250 'rancher' that had a generator option on the main belt off the motor. The ads show a guy cutting boards with a skill saw to mend a fence or something.

edit: I think these also had a ford branded chainsaw over the wheel well on the other side of the engine bay.

▲jcomp 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Had to look this up, not great pics but very cool:

"The generator was called the Electric Power Pak. From 1969 to 1972, Ford offered a 2,500-watt underhood generator, mostly on the Contractor’s Special, though it could be special ordered on other trucks. It also wasn’t driven off the engine’s belt. It was a separate Onan generator with its own 5.5 hp air-cooled single-cylinder engine, feeding an outlet in the bed. It sat on the driver’s side splash pan. The package the commenter calls a “Rancher” is likely the Farm & Ranch Special, which is one of the trucks that came with it.

The chainsaw was real. Ford sold Ford-blue chainsaws from 1970 to about 1976. They were rebadged Ohlsson & Rice saws: the Eagle I/II and the smaller Hawk. A mount was also sold that held the saw on the F-250’s driver’s side inner fender"

https://www.fordification.com/tech/images/onan_brochure-phot... https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5601f99be4b059... https://www.fordification.com/tech/onan.htm

▲jethro_tell 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Nice find. It's been a long time since I've seen these so I did get some details wrong =/

▲jcomp 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I was actually quite impressed by how well you described a 50+ year old product and ad, a commendable recollection in my view

▲stiiv 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have one, and I have powered my house with it on a few occasions. I made the purchase after a friend of mine ran his for four days straight. I always fill up the tank if there are storms coming.

When I was shopping in 2025, this was the only truck with that kind of output.

▲vondur 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I almost purchased that truck, but I needed a higher cargo capacity for my travel trailer, and the added batteries reduced it by 250lbs or so. The ability to plug a travel trailer directly into the truck and run it is really cool.

▲srmatto 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can you actually run home appliances from a regular ICE car? My furnace blower uses ~1800 watts when it kicks in.

▲zardo 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> Can you actually run home appliances from a regular ICE car?

You would need to add an accessory generator (which probably won't fit under the hood) and possibly upgrade the cooling system.

▲s1artibartfast 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Genuinely curious what you mean by this.

▲jubilanti 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

First, 'nearby' can be a 1 hr drive and still be worth it to commute every few days. Second, tornadoes, storms, and floods have exactly that pattern where damage can be block by block.

But it is still cheaper to stockpile some generators and gas than stockpile a cybertruck. If there's an EV charging station up within a 1 hr drive, gas stations are also going to be up.

▲tshaddox 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even if you can’t easily recharge, it’s a great way to power your home for a few days. It’s arguably a very cost-efficient home backup solution, assuming you were already in the market for an EV.

A Cybertruck has nearly 10x the battery capacity of a single Powerwall, and to buy that much Powerwall capacity would cost at least as much as a Cybertruck. Even a Tesla Model 3 (which now supports home backup) is over 5x Powerwalls.

You still have to pay to install home backup support on your home’s breaker (at least $10k), but you don’t need anywhere near the amount of very expensive supplemental home batteries.

Also, even an EV with a 120V outlet and no home backup support could be very useful for recharging a portable battery bank.

▲rightnutwingjob 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> You still have to pay to install home backup support on your home’s breaker (at least $10k),

$10,000 to install a socket, a breaker, and a transfer switch?

Surely not.

▲stiiv 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We priced this out when we bought our Ford F150 generator on wheels. It was maybe 3k including parts and labor. We opted to go without the fancy socket and breaker, and it cost us about 600 USD.

▲SOLAR_FIELDS 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The cheaper version even, which may be what you are talking about, is literally just a piece of plastic or metal called an interlock on the breaker box that prevents the main from being on while the generator inlet is supplying power (backfeeding the line). Then all you need to do is install the inlet on top of that which when I did this a few years ago was around $1,000 USD all in parts and labor.

Electricians like their transfer switches because they are right sized and everything, e.g. they are more foolproof for the end user to operate, but the interlock approach actually gives you more control because every breaker is allowed (a transfer switch will only expose some small subset of all your breakers usually), you just have to manage the power supply yourself.

▲tshaddox 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sorry, that’s for a full Tesla Powerwall (which includes its own 13.5 kWh battery) which is required to use the recently-announced Model 3 and Y home backup feature. The Cybertruck only needs the gateway and wall connector, which is still $2k plus labor.

▲ 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲mensetmanusman an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Sadly in CA…

▲deltoidmaximus 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Some one mentioned something similar about their Ford Lightning in a previous thread. If a whole truck with batteries cost less than the same bare batteries then people buying powerwalls are getting absolutely screwed.

▲tshaddox 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’m not that familiar with the Powerwall ecosystem, but the equipment and installation that connects to your breaker is non-trivial. But I’ve seen people who add bulk OEM batteries to other home backup systems and those are fairly cheap.

Regardless, the thing that’s really great for cost effectiveness is that the same large battery can be used everyday for driving and also used rarely for emergency home backup systems.

▲origini 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Its still a margin issue. The Powerwallproducer wants their 20% margin, the car company might want there 20% too, but from the whole truck.

▲rightnutwingjob 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The battery installer probably chargers a 100% markup.

10% to pay for their costs - materials and labour

90% to pay for their new Cybertruck financing

▲nostrademons 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You want at least one actual PowerWall so that your house doesn't go down when you take your truck on an errand. But yeah, if you're buying 4+ PowerWalls you're probably better off getting an EV with V2H capabilities instead.

▲ralph84 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

More like the people buying electric trucks got incredibly good deals, which is why the trucks are all going out of production.

▲nntwozz 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I live off grid in Sweden all year round with solar and an EV as battery to power everything except heating which I do with wood from my own property.

I'd have animals too but society is still stable enough to provide me with food.

▲FabCH 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The whole point of prepping is to prepare for the unlikely events though.

If you can choose between a truck that can’t power your house and a truck that can, prepper mentality is to choose the one that can.

▲arrowleaf 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

With unlimited money, sure, but your typical prepper would be able to fund a decent portable gas generator and jerry cans (or even a natural gas line) without a need for financing.

▲jklowden 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why does the prepper assume there will be electricity to charge his car?

▲lukan 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In case of living somewhere sunny, because he has solar installed?

▲wyre 5 hours ago | parent [-]

If you are using solar why need the cybertruck at all?

▲forgotaccount3 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Because when you produce more energy than you need, you need to store it somewhere and if the cost is roughly equivalent for that place to be mobile vs a static construction, choosing the mobile one is superior.

▲kube-system 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Standard grid-tie systems shut themselves off during a grid outage due to anti-islanding safety requirements.

If you want your solar panels to be operational during an outage, the typical install for this is a system that already includes batteries.

There are specialized options that exist with islanding features, but if you didn't install your solar system specifically for this you probably don't have it.

▲wyre 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But the cost isn't equivalent at all???

Is this thread being astroturfed? This defence for the Cybertruck ITT is one of the least rational threads I've seen on HN in the past few years and if the CT was actually valuable tech it wouldn't be one of the worst selling vehicles of all time.

▲lukan 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Are you maybe a bit overreacting? The question of emergency power is a rational one and no one here said they thinj a cybertruck is awesome because of it. Just that this is a selling point.

▲wyre 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I am certainly overreacting. I was just dumbfounded by the question I was responding too. If the concern is emergency power there are so many better alternatives than a cybertruck. If the concern is storing an abundance of solar power there are much better alternatives than a cybertruck. I don't want to come onto HN and be marketed products; I come to HN for tech news and to see cool software that people build, not to be marketed a cybertruck.

▲CTDOCodebases 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are a whole bunch of "Prepping" scenarios to prepare for.

▲alterom 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because the "prepper" never had to deal with an actual disaster.

You can stockpile diesel for a generator (unlike electrons). That's what actual prepping looks like.

Take it from a Ukrainian.

▲labcomputer 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Diesel can't be stored forever. Maybe a few years with stabilizer. So you need to remember to rotate it out (and have some use for the fuel you're rotating out).

Much easier to just buy some solar panels to recharge the electric truck.

▲autoexec 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A prepper will already be rotating out food and water anyway. Solar is still a good idea, but so is having fuel powered generators. Might not be too much sunshine in situations like a nuclear winter or geoengineering gone wrong.

▲alterom 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>Diesel can't be stored forever. Maybe a few years with stabilizer. So you need to remember to rotate it out (and have some use for the fuel you're rotating out). Much easier to just buy some solar panels to recharge the electric truck.

Much easier to use diesel in your diesel-powered vehicle.

And then you have much, much energy in your stockpile.

▲wang_li 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Diesel just lengthens the storage time. You still have to go somewhere to get it when your onsite tank runs dry. For the electric side you could also have a bunch of solar panels. Lots of choices.

And if the needle is so far towards apocalypse, then the horse beats your diesel. Repairs itself, refuels itself, and replaces itself.

▲rglullis 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The ultimate preppers just become Amish.

▲wang_li 6 hours ago | parent [-]

If it works it's not stupid. Or something.

▲davrosthedalek 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> replaces itself At least two horses then.

▲scottyah 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's fun till you run out. The sun isn't going to replace your daily use.

▲grey-area 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The supercharger stations will obviously keep working during the apocalypse.

▲alterom 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you can choose between a truck that becomes a dead weight when the nearby power plant comes offline, and a truck that won't, the prepper mentality is to choose the latter.

Take it from a Ukrainian.

PS: my dual-fuel gasoline/LPG Renault Twingo in Poland will outrun any Cybertruck on the continent.

And, unlike electricity, you can stockpile gasoline.

▲senderista 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can't stockpile gasoline for a long time without stabilizer.

Source: I've mucked up multiple small engines with bad stored gas.

▲jethro_tell 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

sure, you can get propane or diesel setups that keep somewhere between a long time and indefinably.

▲labcomputer 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You can't store diesel forever, either.

Propane, sure, but now you're talking about something fairly exotic, at least in terms of vehicles you can buy "off the shelf."

In any case, you can't produce propane yourself. You can "produce" electrons with a solar panel.

Edit: My bias is toward North America, but I know of only one model of "normal person car" (city buses don't count) produced in the last 50 years that you could just walk into a dealership and purchase new: The Honda Civic NX. And that was sold for only a few years and only available in California.

▲jethro_tell 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I do agree with you on solar for moving off grid. I'm working to convert my full farm and most farm rigs to battery over time because "You can't be your own refinery, but you can be your own power plant."

But for conversations sake, if we're talking about diesel trucks, and specifically an old mechanical diesel like a 7.3 ford or a 12 valve cummins, and we're talking about stored diesel, ideally a class D died diesel with a high sulfer content, then you'll get considerably more lifetime out of it than the recommended 18-24 months.

Additionally, you can burn about anything, old motor oil, fry oil, diesel with algee in it if you treat it and change your filters. A good, mechanical, not very picky diesel will burn fuel that is 20+ years old. Not forever, and you'll go through some filters and maybe injectors. By the time you get to fuel sources that can't be burned in a machine like that, or you've burned it up past your parts and ability to repair. you'll probably have a lot of other problems.

If we're talking generators, you can get off the shelf propane generators and propane stores well.

▲alterom 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>You can't stockpile gasoline for a long time without stabilizer.

If you have a vehicle that runs on gasoline, you don't have to store gasoline for a long time to have a stockpile.

The cost of a few empty canisters is by far smaller than the cost of solar batteries, and putting gas into a vehicle in case of an emergency within a span of seconds rather than hours is a huge asset.

Not to mention: not everyone has space for solar. City dwellers are particularly constrained (as in: people who live in apartment complexes).

▲Brian_K_White 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah but the Chinese minerals and the exotic infrastructure needed to manufacture cans and hoses...

▲Toynbeeidea 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That sort of thing happens all the time. All it takes is, say, a big fallen tree in the wrong spot. Its entirely possible for just your road to be SOL for days, if the local utility is otherwise completely swamped by bigger issues from whatever disaster is going on.

▲snickerbockers 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is one of those things that happens in rural areas, "the city" (which is not actually a city in any sense but the legal one) gets power on in a day or so but your neighborhood 10 miles away doesn't get power for another week because the population density is something like 50/sq mile at most. And that's just for the people in actual neighborhoods, if you're on a farm or something where the nearest neighbor is a mile down the highway I don't even know how long it takes them to fix your power lines.

▲uxp100 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I grew up in the country, just not far from a town of 2000, but had friends who were more remote, and my power is, well not exactly less reliable now that I’m in the city, but not necessarily better. They would have power to my house or my friends house back pretty quick. Longest I remember was maybe 4 hours. We’ve had 36 hour outages in the city (more than half a million people). I do think we had more outages in the country, but never very long. Structure of the distribution network? Ease of accessing the lines?

▲walterlw 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Living in Ukraine, I can tell you it's not niche here. Most homeowners without power walls already consider buying an EV because you also get to drive it to an area that has electricity at the time.

▲trimbo 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> This seems like an awfully niche case, no?

Not really. Some areas in California have multiple PSPS outages during fire season. Many people have gotten gas generators or powerwalls to deal with it, but using your EV would be ideal.

▲Larrikin 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Why would that be ideal? I would be worried constantly about if I'm trading electricity in my house for the ability to go somewhere in an emergency. If it's such a real concern you even think about it when buying a car you should have a dedicated device.

Generators have solved this problem. My family used to lose electricity anytime there was a semi serious snow storm. We got a gasoline generator after the second time and it was always sufficient. We never needed to siphon gas from the car either. We later transitioned to a natural gas generator. The lines are all underground and tie into the existing system for the stove and dryer. No car involved.

▲mrj 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because it's clean (no carbon monoxide dangers, no fuel storage concerns, no oil changes) and quiet (can sleep).

▲arrowleaf 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

First thing I thought of was if I had a gasoline generator, I'd probably invest the $5 or so into a hand siphon. You can even keep it running as you go to refill up your vehicle!

▲nonethewiser 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>This seems like an awfully niche case, no?

No. It's like a generator except way more power and mobile. Rechargable via solar. So basically just a much better generator.

▲drivingmenuts 7 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲biztos 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Greetings from Northern California! Multi-day power outages are not at all uncommon (though I've never seen 14 days). We had one about a month ago. Most people just have generators, but if you wanted to use a Cybertruck instead, the nearest superchargers are one hour away and do not go offline when we lose power.

▲plorg 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I suspect an hour's drive is getting close to the point where the supercharger solution gets frustratingly annoying. You have to budget 1/3 of your energy just to the round trip, which will take you at least 4 hours for a complete fill, and may only get you 2 days of power.

But it's not bad to ride out the first couple of days if you've got 120kWh just sitting in your garage.

▲privacyisntdead 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not niche at all. Loss of power for days is common in areas of strong storms with above ground power lines. States frequented by hurricanes and strong storms can experience days to weeks without power.

Ford has also marketed their hybrid F150 as being able to power home appliances for several years.

▲JamesSwift 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In places like Florida its absolutely something that would not be considered niche.

▲ihaveajob 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah... even powerwalls and equivalent don't seem to be a good just-in-case solution. A gas generator costs 5% for the same capacity, and you can just go get some extra gas when the storm comes. I'm all for electrification, but after doing the math, it doesn't work for this particular corner case.

▲NetMageSCW an hour ago | parent [-]

I think a powerwall or similar only makes sense with solar, but an EV can be a nice emergency supply for little extra cost as long as you don’t need it often.

▲booty 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you're already committed to owning a bigass $100K electric truck this is an inarguably awesome side benefit. It's a truck, so... you have a few hundred miles of range. Slightly better than "down the street."

But for the other 99.99% of humanity, there are certainly more cost-effective ways. A portable power station and solar panels are probably the better move unless you have some really massive power needs.

(Admittedly, a nuclear winter reduces the effectiveness of those solar panels somewhat)

▲RajT88 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Actually, if my car worked as a whole-house UPS and base smart battery (charging at night when power is cheap, drawing during day when it's expensive), that's a pretty nice value-add for a vehicle purchase.

Doesn't make sense for what they are charging for it. But still!

▲rgreasons 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Other commenters are pointing out places where it isn’t that niche, but I just want to call out that there’s a whole cottage industry for preppers that would eat this up. I would consider a 30-pound bucket full of shelf-stable Mac and cheese “pretty niche,” but it flew off the shelves at Costco.

▲xur17 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not sure it is. I've considered getting home batteries for power outages (due to fires), and frankly given the install cost, using a car is compelling. Not only do they have enormous batteries (a model 3 has a 57.5 kwh battery and can be acquired for 20k), but they can be driven to recharge every few days if need be.

Where I'm located, in most cases when there is an outage, neighboring areas do have power.

Specifically for my model 3, I've been considering tapping into the HV system manually to keep my Ecoflow battery topped up, but I wish there was a way to directly connect it.

▲Bombthecat 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, with climate change and weather getting more extreme, it might happen more often...

▲ponector 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Also an american only case. But anyway trucks are not popular elsewhere, little sense to buy it

▲mensetmanusman an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Niche until it’s life/death unfortunately.

▲nostrademons 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've got a friend who does it simply to fuck PG&E and avoid an electric bill. He has workplace charging, a Cybertruck, and a powerwall + Tesla solar setup at home. He drives his truck to work, fills up on electricity, drives it home at the end of the day, and uses it to power his house. Repeat the next day. The Cybertruck was cheaper than the 13 PowerWalls or whatever that's the equivalent battery capacity.

▲sumeno 6 hours ago | parent [-]

PG&E is still getting paid, he's just stealing from his employer to do it instead of paying directly

▲nostrademons 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Technically not stealing, it's a legal workplace benefit. Possibly abuses the spirit of the policy and may get the policy changed if enough people do it, but he's only doing what he's entitled to.

And there's actually a good chance that PG&E is not being paid: most of the big tech companies have large solar installations covering the parking lot which power all the EV chargers, so they cut PG&E out of it entirely and produce their own power.

▲solyin 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Which is why PG&E started charging for grid connections. They still get their dollar at the end of the day unless you island.

▲labcomputer 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, but PG&E is getting paid much less.

PG&E has special tariffs for meters that are used only for powering commercial EV chargers ("BEV1" and "BEV2"). They're about half of what a residential consumer would pay for an EV-only meter (the "EV-B" tariff).

▲delabay 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My silicon valley neighborhood lost power for two days in 2025 starting on Christmas day.

In what universe is backup power a niche use case?

▲qurren 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Actually no, and in fact almost all EVs are capable of powering a house for quite a while. It would be excellent if this was not just a Cybertruck-exclusive feature since here in the bay area we have shitty infrastructure too and power outages happen several times per winter.

▲s1artibartfast 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not uncommon in parts of California where certain legs of the grid are shut down for high wind events. If you live in Pacifica, you might have your power out for 3 to 5 days, but there will be reliable power in San Francisco 20 minutes away.

▲runarberg 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

An awful lot Elon’s products seem uniquely capable in extreme niche cases primarily caused by America‘s horrendous track record of maintaining, upgrading, and filling in traditional infrastructure.

▲wang_li 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Two observations with complaining about America's infrastructure:

1. America is huge. Comparing it to places in Europe is like comparing it to New Hampshire.

2. American has imported tons of people who are incapable of sustaining a high standard of living on their own. It only takes a few percent shift in GDP/person to change how much infrastructure you can build and maintain unless you are truly willing to let all the folks with less than a high school education and no special job skills live in favelas.

▲runarberg 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I really should not engage with the bigotry you demonstrated in your point two, but I will still offer you a rebuttal.

Iceland (part of Europe) is the size of Florida with 2/3 the population of Wyoming. 20% of Iceland’s population are 1st generation immigrants. Neither of those facts prevents Iceland from filling in, upgrading, and maintaining their infrastructure. The two week power blackout which GP’s friend experienced is unheard of in Iceland. And every population center, no matter how remote and low population (we are talking fewer then 100) still gets broadband internet via traditional infrastructure.

I also want to note that I did not compare America with Europe, you did that. And it is a determent to your argument (as if your racism didn’t do that already).

▲wang_li 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Acknowledging the existence of people without educations is not bigotry. For example, can you explain why remote tribes in the amazon rainforest don't all have space programs? I think it's because the lack the societal and individual development to have the productive capacity to do such a thing. Why do you think they don't? It's economic reality that if there is only a limited number of people who can do a thing, the amount of that thing is going to be limited. And when you abstract that through culture and modern life, the way you say that is GDP per capita.

You know that Helene was a category 4 hurricane that crossed six states, affected tens of millions of people and cause $78 billion dollars in damage. It was a major event like nothing that has ever happened in Iceland. That level of event in Iceland would remove it as a going concern.

To respond to your add, yes I brought up Europe because outside of Europe there are like 3 countries that even have comparable infrastructure to the US. If you say "America has a terrible track record with infrastructure." Then the implication is that there is somewhere that does better. And my argument is that selectively you can probably find places but nothing as large as the US or with as many people who can't contribute to it's maintenance. (Did you know that in the US more than 50% of households are not net tax payers? All of the American infrastructure burden is carried by less than half of the households.) Your example of Iceland has 13000 KM of roads, of which 7,300 KM are paved. How is that some comparison?

▲runarberg 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Acknowledging the existence of people without educations is not bigotry.

It is. Education has been an excuse for discrimination for a long time. When you describe a whole demographic as being uneducated you are applying exactly the kind of rhetoric which white Rhodesians used to excuse their discrimination[1].

> You know that Helene was a category 4 hurricane that crossed six states.

A Volcano erupted in the town of Grindavík, the main line which connected the town to it’s power plant, went under lava. The town was out of power for a maximum of 7 days.[2]

But in any case, 2 week long blackouts are extremely common in the USA regardless of the severity of the natural disaster. When I first moved to the Seattle area in 2016 a common snow storm caused a blackout which lasted for 2 weeks in some areas outside of Seattle. The reason for the length of the blackouts in the USA is simply due to the quality and maintenance of the infrastructure and any lack of action plans to fix them when they break.

1: https://youtu.be/SLmD23UpLOo?si=hnyOlxPqDmWwQfRp&t=1299

2: https://www.ruv.is/frettir/innlent/2024-06-05-koma-rafmagni-...

▲wang_li 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Comparing a volcanic eruption, a totally stationary event with predictable flows, that affected 3500 people in a town, where most of the residents have since left because of the problems living there, to a class 4 hurricane that crossed over six states, hundreds of miles, and affected millions of people, is dumb.

I've lived in the Seattle area since 2007. There has not been any power outage that affected 3000+ homes that has lasted longer than a day.

Additionally, Seattle area does not have common snow storms. It has extremely infrequent snow storms and thus has no reason to have lots of cold weather equipment. What we do have is frequent wind storms and lots and lots of trees (orders of magnitude more trees than all of Iceland, for example) and the wind often knocks trees into power lines and those are fixed in less than a day. In terms of neglect, that's not a problem. The longest outage I've ever had in the suburbs is 18 hours.

The real reason for the long duration blackouts is not failure to maintain infrastructure, it's because of natural disasters that damage and destroy entire swaths of infrastructure in a single event over thousands of sq km.

That someone, somewhere once used some accusation about a trait of populations as a form of discrimination does not mean that every recognition of that trait in a different population is also discrimination. Like, we can look at a person and say "oh, he never finished high school" that doesn't mean we're irrationally discriminating against him. You discriminate on exactly this basis every single day. You don't have people who don't know driving/cooking/medicine/engineering/automobile repair/etc. provide those services to you. I guess you're a bigot.

▲runarberg 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> Comparing a volcanic eruption, [...], to a class 4 hurricane [...], is dumb.

I agree. One can judge America’s lousy infrastructure and lack of action plan on its own merits. There is no reason to bring Europe into this. All I am saying is, America’s sparse population, nor the education level of immigrants is not an excuse.

▲mopsi 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even outside of natural disasters, it's a very useful feature for people in the construction business and similar fields where mains power might not be always available.

▲arrowleaf 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Thin line between gimmick and very useful considering powerful worksite gas generators exist for less than $5k

▲LadyCailin 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I saw it happen during Katrina. Neighborhoods within an easy drive of each other where one had power, and the other not. Not to mention the fact that vehicle charging stations may well be prioritized to restore power.

It’s niche just because natural disasters are thankfully relatively rare, but I still think having good contingencies is worth it.

Fuck being seen in a cybertruck though.

▲cguess 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> Not to mention the fact that vehicle charging stations may well be prioritized to restore power

Electric vehicles won't, ever, be prioritized over bringing up residential, commercial and emergency services. The fact that even on a super charger it's 20+ minutes to charge a Cybertruck means the two or three at the local gas station will just end up with 12+ hour lines. Even now generators are fueled before private vehicles.

Bringing up power after disasters is super dangerous as is. A lot of systems that hadn't been turned off in years do a cold start, and sparks fly. It's why the power company and fire departments coordinate very very closely on grid work.

You know someone's going to try and bypass any safeties and circuit breakers and end up taking down their house when they try to restore power after a flood or something. People already regularly die from running their generator in the garage and most of these aren't wired directly into house mains.

▲NetMageSCW an hour ago | parent [-]

Can you find one supercharger with only three plugs?

▲hlehmann 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲spaceywilly 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Another way to view this is that driving a cybertruck every day is quite wasteful (no different than driving a full size gas pickup every day). One recharge cycle in a cybertruck uses enough energy to power a typical home for 8 days, 130kWh. If you aren’t doing truck things with it, it’s better to drive a more efficient EV or hybrid car. It uses almost twice as much Wh per mile compared to a model Y.

I think this is why these EV trucks don’t do well (ford also cancelled the F150 lightning). For truck things, they aren’t particularly capable (you’d get less than 100 miles towing). For daily driving duty, a car or small suv is much more efficient. You can power your home during a storm from most EVs these days, you’d just have to top it up more often

▲dllu 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Cybertruck uses like a fifth of the energy of a full size gas pickup truck and is only like 50% more than a typical smaller sized EV. The truth is that most homes don't use much energy apart from hvac. The Chevy Bolt can also power a home for several days if you only have the fridge and lights running.

▲jmb99 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Cybertruck uses like a fifth of the energy of a full size gas pickup truck

Yes, but the energy density of the energy storage mechanism in the cybertruck is substantially lower than a gas pickup truck

▲pseudosavant 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, but a gas engine is so inefficient that it loses more than half of that energy to waste heat. But almost all of the electricity is converted into useful power in an EV. A 600hp Cybertruck will go 13 miles on $1 of electricity, but a 400hp F-150 can only go 4.5 miles for $1 of gas. 50% more power at 1/3rd the fuel cost is a pretty significant benefit.

Not a Cybertruck fan myself, but unless you are going to tow or take many long road trips, an EV truck will work great for anyone who can charge at home. And most people don't tow, or take long road trips, with their trucks.

▲margalabargala an hour ago | parent [-]

> And most people don't tow, or take long road trips, with their trucks.

Except for everyone who owns an RV trailer.

▲NetMageSCW an hour ago | parent [-]

Which is roughly 7 million out of 49 million pickups, so a tiny number.

▲margalabargala an hour ago | parent [-]

One seventh of a category is not "tiny".

▲thejazzman 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And this matters why? It still fits in a garage and powered someone’s home for a week, while also being their vehicle. Stationary batteries couldn’t have driven themselves to the supercharger.

I am not a fan of the truck, but let’s make some sense here

▲jmb99 7 hours ago | parent [-]

No, but a stationary generator powered off a small volume of gasoline could have powered the house for the same amount of time, and then a gasoline powered car could've driven to the gas station to refill jerry cans. Both of which would cost substantially less than a cybertruck.

▲porphyra 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Yea but then you have to deal with gas which is nasty and stinky and noisy and polluting while having way less efficiency. A cybertruck charged with solar power is much more elegant and civilized.

▲sportsracersss 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Producing that enormous battery pack is nasty and stinky and noisy and polluting. It's just a cost that's paid upfront and the pollution is done in someone else's backyard.

▲solyin 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's paid up front once. That battery is going to keep being a battery for the rest of its commercially viable lifespan. The gasoline just gets used up and you pollute over and over again to maintain having power.

▲InvertedRhodium 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Better theirs than mine or yours.

▲jmb99 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A generator to power your house costs <$1k. A car that runs on gas costs <$5k, or if you want something that "matches" a cybertruck, ~$50k new. You can buy a lot of gasoline for those things before you get close to what a cybertruck costs. I don't care how "elegant" solar panels and a cybertruck might be if you're throwing money away to achieve it. (Ignoring that you can't both drive your truck and have your house powered from it simultaneously, and I don't think anyone in history has considered the cybertruck to be "elegant" - at least no one with eyes.)

▲ 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲bryanlarsen 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Driving is wasteful. Cybertrucks and Prius's use similar amounts of energy per mile. Cybertruck is 0.4-0.5 kWh/mile, the Prius is 0.6-0.7 kWh/mile.

Of course the Prius Prime on electricity is way more efficient than both, but it still uses a lot more energy than a house.

▲pintxo 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

European units (`Energy/100km`) work nicely here, lots of EVs are around `20 kWh/100km`, and most residential housing around here consumes less than `20kWh/day`, actually averaging `20kWh/day` would probably cover a well insulated house including heating (heatpump).

Yes, driving, compared to living, uses ridiculous amounts of energy.

▲dllu 7 hours ago | parent [-]

With dimensional analysis you can cancel it all the way out until it's just Newtons, which is actually just the average drag force times some efficiency multiplier.

▲jaggederest 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Dimensional analysis is a superpower honestly. Even in a software engineering career it's saved me from massive issues quite routinely

▲NetMageSCW an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The HP 48G / 50G provides incredible unit handling. My main use for it these days.

▲vpmadd52huq 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Mandatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/3038/

▲dllu 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Also: https://xkcd.com/687/

▲selimthegrim 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Any war stories?

▲jaggederest 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Requests per second, bytes per request, bytes per second should all match up very closely under dimensional analysis or something is drastically wrong ;)

Little's law is another related phenomenon that is super critical. Measuring things when the units don't match has bitten me more than once.

▲selimthegrim 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Concur on Little's law

▲gertlex 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm curious if you can elaborate further? Would that make the comparison clearer, or is it just a side-note on your part?

▲dllu 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Work (energy) is force times distance. Since we're talking about energy divided by distance, it's actually just average force.

Actually newtons are just a constant factor (3.6) compared to Wh per km, since there are 3600 seconds in a hour while there are 1000 watts in a kilowatt. For example 144 Wh/km (or 14.4 kWh/100 km) would simply be 518 N. This also means that pushing along a Tesla on the highway at constant speed is roughly as hard as holding a 50 kg weight, giving you an intuitive sense of how "hard" it is to keep things moving.

Of course, in everyday life, since we buy electricity from our utilities in kWh rather than joules, it's more convenient to talk about kWh per km (or per mile).

▲hamdingers 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For comparison my cargo ebike, which is not particularly efficient, consumes about 30 Wh/mi (0.03kWh/mi) in medium assist while transporting an adult and two kids.

▲SequoiaHope 7 hours ago | parent [-]

My road bike consumes energy bars! And fruit!

▲tga_d 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Surprisingly enough, this makes acoustic bikes less carbon efficient per unit distance than electric ones, depending on the details of your diet. Of course, once the emissions are that low, this is more a curiosity than actionable insight (beyond the typical "less meat/dairy = lower emissions").

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW5b8_KBtT8

▲sportsracersss 5 hours ago | parent [-]

"Acoustic" bike? What is this madness?

I thought you were autocorrected badly but I guess this is a term people use?

▲eclarkso 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's a joke referencing electric vs. acoustic guitars.

▲s-zeng 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What a coincidence, my cargo bike that regularly takes 50kg of cargo runs on the same stuff !

▲ 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲DonHopkins 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So you ride around town in a PacMan? Aren't ghosts a problem?

▲RankingMember 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Just gotta always have a Power Pellet in range

▲RankingMember 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I get 30 miles per sandwich! Beat that EV owners! :P

▲solyin 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What's in that sandwich though? The Cybertruck using California non-renewable energy creates 162g of CO2 per mile. A sandwich full of lamb generates 666g. A sandwich of lentils does 40g.

▲barbazoo 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are those numbers right? 0.4 kWh/mile is 24.85 kWh/100km compared to about 14 kWh/100km my Kia Niro EV uses.

▲bryanlarsen 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Those numbers are saying that:

- the Cybertruck uses almost twice as much energy as your Niro EV

- the 40% efficient Prius uses about 2.5x as much energy as your 95% efficient Niro EV.

what seems off?

▲benatkin 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Driving uses a lot of energy. It's wasteful if you aren't getting a good use out of it (of which just driving around to relax could me considered a good use, but of which some manager requiring RTO might not be).

▲jotux 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>For daily driving duty, a car or small suv is much more efficient.

I have a lightning and it averages 0.5kwh/mile and my electricity price is $0.15/kwh, so it costs me $0.075/mile to drive. At current gas prices that's pretty much the same as a very efficient hybrid compact car (55mpg @ ~$4/gallon). If I had solar I could probably offset almost all of the lightning fuel cost based on where I live (sunny) but it's so cheap it's not worth it.

Do you mean "much more efficient" in places where electricity rates are significantly higher than the national average? Or only much more efficient when compared to when you're charging at charging stations?

▲spaceywilly an hour ago | parent [-]

I mean efficient in engineering terms, not economics. A cybertruck is not as efficient as a small SUV (model Y) which is not as efficient as a sedan (model 3).

Cybertruck — 2mi/kwh

Model Y — 3.8mi/kwh

Model 3 — 4mi/kwh

▲NetMageSCW an hour ago | parent [-]

But economic terms are what matters.

▲huijzer 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Another way to view this is that driving a cybertruck every day is quite wasteful (no different than driving a full size gas pickup every day). One recharge cycle in a cybertruck uses enough energy to power a typical home for 8 days, 130kWh.

Driving in general uses a lot of energy. It’s the physically moving a 1,000 kg or more object that takes a lot of energy. Orders of magnitude more than a few lights or a phone. Same with flying of course; also moving a heavy object.

▲sanj 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As someone towing every weekend with a Lightning, I get closer to 150mi.

ICE trucks are equally inefficient for towing. People just don't seem to be able to factor it in.

▲porphyra 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The thing is that ICE vehicles are so inefficient to begin with, but a towed trailer needs the same amount of energy regardless of what is towing it.

Imagine a trailer takes 1 unit of energy to move, and ICE truck takes 5 units to move itself, and EV truck takes 1 unit to move itself.

The ICE truck towing it would go from 5 units to 6 units, reducing the range by 16%.

The EV truck would now go from 1 unit to 2 units, reducing the range by 50%.

So the better your efficiency, the worse you are at towing. Ideally EV trucks would have such a huge battery that even when the range is reduced by 50%, it is still as long as a gas truck's range, but modern battery technology is still too sucky to achieve this.

▲jmb99 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are they really that inefficient? My 94 Roadmaster sedan gets 14ish mpg towing 7000lbs at 60mph, which works out to a bit over 300 miles on a tank. I figured your average gas truck would do at least that well, and they have larger tanks.

▲dmtroyer 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

meanwhile, my impression is the whole poor towing narrative (while true) is a big part of what killed the ev truck when how many people use trucks in the way they could otherwise use a four-door sedan.

▲lightedman 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"ICE trucks are equally inefficient for towing."

Not so sure about that one, boss. I can fully-load up a Ford Ranger to its 7500lb rated towing capacity and lose ~10% in fuel economy/range while you just dropped something like 30% (from the base power package range of ~240 miles, platinum package at 300 miles you're losing half if you only get 150 miles out.)

▲scottyah 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You're talking about the difference between towing and not towing per vehicle, not the difference in energy used towing between vehicles.

To get their equal ranges, a Ford Raptor would have a ~4 gallon tank. The fact that the cybertruck can go so far while not towing is the miracle. How far do you think you're going to get with 4 gallons?

▲devin 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If the underlying energy is coming from a renewable source, then it wouldn't matter all that much, would it?

▲mhluongo 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Power still costs money.

▲tarpitt 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Sure but even electrical power from natural gas or nuke plants is way cheaper than gasoline. Power plants employ massive economies of scale in generation. Even the cost of solar power has fallen dramaticially.

I think in general, a country trying to become industrious and eco-friendly by saving energy is like a person trying to become a millionaire by pinching pennies. Once you have optimized an economic system to eliminate the major cost centers, you're going to have extremely hard time improving it through further cost savings.

For example, If my expenditure roughly matches my income, I would need to eliminate 100% of my expenses just to make enough surplus to match doubling my income. Once I have managed the major cost centers (rent, insurance, etc.) it's not going to be worth my time to further optimize my expendature, the time would be better spent improving my income

For EVs, the fuel cost is already low. The next cost centers are like maintainance, tires, battery life. It would be better to attack these other cost centers or somehow pursue functionality that increases utility of the car.

▲duderific 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Just FYI, in some areas of California, served by PG&E, electricity at peak times is $.58/kwh. When gas was around $4.00/gal, it was actually cheaper to use gas in that scenario. (I have a PHEV so I can do either.)

You can get a special account for home charging that lowers that rate to $.32/kwh, and at my work I can charge my car for $.28/kwh. At those rates, and with gas where it is now (typically $5.50 - $6.00/gal) it makes sense to use electric.

▲tarpitt 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes it's ridicuous. Many of the charging stations here in PA charge 40c/kwh (my break-even is 30c/kwh). It's not profitable against gas even at these prices. Luckily residential rates are 13c/kwh but it's very inconvenient out here still.

▲NetMageSCW an hour ago | parent [-]

Is that using today’s gas prices?

▲tarpitt 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I own a pretty typical phev sedan (Gen 2. Volt), and I use more electricity on my 20 mile commute than the rest of my power usage combined.

All cars just use a ton of power moving a lot of mass. It is actually impressive, it's like 100KW at full tilt. I think i saw someone do the math for how much power transfer you would need to get EV charging as fast as gasoline refuelling: It's in the megawatts.

The only way you could signifigantly reduce power usage of vehicles is to reduce mass dramaticially with a motorcyle or autocycle. The Aptera is an interesting autocycle design based on this line of reasoning, but we are also seeing the emergence of a lot of electric motorcycles.

▲spaceywilly 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yep, having each individual person commuting in their own car is just not that efficient in general. Another data point that amazes me is the NYC subway uses 4-5 million kWh per day. Sounds like a lot until you realize that around 4 million people ride it every day, that’s about 1kWh, or maybe like 20 cents of electricity, per rider. A person commuting 35 miles in an EV would take about 10 kWh daily. They’re never going to beat the efficiency of public transportation.

Also regarding filling up an EV as fast as gasoline, there’s a company in China that has demonstrated charging from 20-80% in 5 minutes. They’re using 3MW charging.

It makes you realize why gasoline has been so popular for so long, you can stop for 5 minutes and dump 500 kWh of energy into your tank. Unfortunately most of that is wasted as heat during the combustion process.

▲scottyah 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The subway has some great efficiency gains because it's use is so narrow. It can only transport humans and small amounts of luggage, and only goes from point to point with no variability or any real use for transporting any of the materials those people need to survive. You're just dumping the costs off to other areas.

Also, if you factor in the construction, idk what the timeline to pay that off would be.

▲eldaisfish 2 hours ago | parent [-]

ok, so then you should also factor in the environmental destruction cause by building roads, the cost of the roads, the environmental cost of burning petrol, the environmental damage of extracting and refining petroleum, and so on.

▲NetMageSCW 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

I thought the comparison was to a BEV, not ICE.

▲tarpitt 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>Also regarding filling up an EV as fast as gasoline, there’s a company in China that has demonstrated charging from 20-80% in 5 minutes. They’re using 3MW charging.

Yeah that's the exact post I saw. I didn't believe the video at the time but I suppose it's possible with enough battery paralellism and cooling.

https://www.thecooldown.com/green-tech/new-ev-technology-cha...

▲sourweasel 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In addition to the Aptera, I think there's a potential market for the enclosed 2-wheel vehicles also like the MonoRacer. The aerodynamic efficiency gains of enclosed cabin motorcycles is huge and greatly improves range, especially at highway speeds. I'd like to see something similar at a lower price range and produced in greater volume.

https://www.peravescz.com/electric-version/

▲nightbun 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In summer time with a pool and AC, we use 100kw in one day

▲ToucanLoucan 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah the Silverado EV has my attention but it's the same issue: if you, like me, actually use your truck for truck shit, an electric truck is a substantial, notable downgrade from ICE.

That said if you have a Mall Crawler who's heaviest loads are your monthly Costco run, an electric truck would probably be great for you. I still wouldn't recommend a Cybertruck though.

▲tiohijazi 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, wasteful, like one day we will ever run out of energy lol

▲carlosjobim 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲lrobinovitch 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is now a feature of most new Tesla vehicles:

https://www.tesla.com/powershare/#vehicles

> Powershare allows you to draw power directly from your compatible Tesla vehicle to power your devices, your home or the grid.

> Powershare is currently available for all Cybertruck vehicles, and all new Model 3 and Model Y2 vehicles ordered on October 1, 2026 or later.

> To verify if your vehicle has Powershare, navigate to ‘Software’ > ‘Additional Vehicle Info’ > ‘Powershare Support: Enabled’ on your vehicle touchscreen.

▲rootusrootus 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The caveat is that Powershare is low wattage. You really need to pair it with a Powerwall and have an average draw less than the limited capability of the car to supply it.

To power a house directly from an EV, the main options now are the EV trucks -- Lightning, Silverado, Cybertruck all can have this ability, 240V 30A typically

▲thanhhaimai 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I ran the fridges and essentials with my Ioniq 5 the last time there was an extended power loss.

I don't think the residential power generator is needed anymore if you have an electric car.

▲jvanderbot 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I have a Tesla Y. It has almost a week of power sitting in it on full charge. There's no hookup. The only power outlet is usb-c pd.

Completely missed opportunity. I won't be buying an electric vehicle that doesn't allow powering my house, ever again.

▲Diederich 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I have a 2017 Tesla S100D. (Yay back when we had letters and numbers!)

As you probably know, there's a 12 volt battery in these cars. That battery is automatically recharged by the big 100kWh main battery.

Some years back, I bought a 12 volt, 2000W inverter and connected it to this 12 volt battery in the Tesla, ran a couple of extension cords, and powered our refrigerator, extra freezer, and a number of other things with it for many hours. The main battery percentage in the car showed an appropriate drop. This actually wasn't during an outage, it was contingency testing. We already have a natural gas, 3600 watt generator that connects to one of our panels and use that during (unfortunately frequent) outages.

In my 2017, it's a bit of work to get to that battery, but it's quite doable and seemingly quite safe. The obvious, very rough/estimated/simplistic math is the 100kWh main battery divided by 2kW is about 50 hours. Different factors would push that number up and down of course.

▲jvanderbot 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

During an outage I tried the 12v and found it was unable to surge the freezer box. Now, the inverter I used wasn't great, but IIRC I read they didn't allow significant current off the cig lighter outlet.

I will definitely try this again. If it works, that'd be great.

▲mylies43 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Doesnt powershare just work via the charging cable? It is a advertised feature of the Y

▲hocusPokeUs 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.tesla.com/powershare/#vehicles

Only available on Tesla models ordered after October 1, 2026

Tesla models older than 6 weeks are SOL (for now? Maybe it just needs some backwards compatibility testing)

▲josephcsible 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> Tesla models older than 6 weeks are SOL (for now? Maybe it just needs some backwards compatibility testing)

It sounds like it will require a hardware retrofit, that isn't being offered to consumers yet: https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/4585/tesla-publishes-vehic...

▲cyberax 5 hours ago | parent [-]

This is vehicle-to-load that requires a bi-directional inverter. They can totally do vehicle-to-grid without ANY hardware changes.

▲flir 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think it's got V2H with lots of caveats (eg only on vehicles manufactured on or after October 1, 2026)

▲IrishTechie 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have an older Model Y too. It’s a real bummer that Tesla decided to give up being the bleeding edge tech company. No V2L/V2H, no Apple CarPlay, no longer range leaders in their category (though still cheapest per km range).

▲darknavi 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> There's no hookup. The only power outlet is usb-c pd.

We have a 12v port that we can get ~200W out of, so that could power our internet.

But I agree, a real joke to have 150KwH (two EVs) in my garage and no way to even plug in a fridge.

V2H/V2L is a must have in my next EV.

▲xg15 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The only power outlet is usb-c pd.

Don't give the USB consortium any ideas...

▲burntpineapple 8 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

▲ramses0 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No association, but something like this is "the right answer", IMHO: https://www.cargenerator.com/pages/use-your-car-as-a-backup-...

1) if you're permanently modifying your home or electric panel you're over $1k. (General Motors "Vehicle2House" is ~$10-20k for hardware + installation... an EXTREME investment unless you plan on regular "emergency" usage of it)

2) if you're buying some portable solar panel "battery boom box" you'll likely run out and the folding solar panel it comes with is more gimmick than reliable

3) if you're buying a "real" gas/diesel generator, you have to run it + change the oil every 6 months otherwise it might not start in your emergency situation

...just buy a thing that clips to your car battery and dangles out the front hood of your car!

You already maintain your car every 3-9 months, you already (should) have at least 1/2 tank of gas at all times (especially in a weather / outage situation), you can generally idle your car for at least 2 days off a tank of gas in an emergency, and if this thing can charge your phone/battery packs, keep your fridge running (kindof?), and run a small space heater overnight...

It makes soooo much more sense to buy a $500-$1000 emergency accessory that piggybacks off the car you already maintain than trying to stand up a whole extra distribution mechanism for "survival-ish power, maybe 1-2 times over 3-4 years".

▲mikestew 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't think the residential power generator is needed anymore if you have an electric car.

As soon as we got the adapter for our Ioniq 5, I sold generator to a neighbor. The car will run what we need for four days, which is longer than the generator and five gallon can of gas is going to last.

▲barbazoo 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you have an electric car that supports V2H.

Despite the dealer saying the used one I bought supported it, it turned out to not be available in the trim I got. My fault obviously for believing something a car dealer said.

▲QuantumNomad_ 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This thread is first time I hear about V2H. (I don’t have any car yet, electric or otherwise.)

It sounds amazing. Only thing I wonder if it can even be set up so that it will be like an Uninterruptible Power Supply. So that when there is a blackout, the V2H supplies all the power without any interruption.

I have several computers but no UPS yet. Imagine if I could buy an electric car and when I am not using it, my car is UPS for my whole house including my computers! :D

▲masklinn 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> It sounds amazing. Only thing I wonder if it can even be set up so that it will be like an Uninterruptible Power Supply. So that when there is a blackout, the V2H supplies all the power without any interruption.

That's the point of V2H (or a residential battery, which it emulates). Although you still want a UPS for computers: I doubt "without any interruption" is at the scale of a UPS, and possibly not at the scale a desktop computer will require. Notably it depends how the grids cuts off, if it cuts off in one shot (like throwing the breaker) the failover should be almost instantaneous, but if it fluctuates before failing the battery might need a lot longer to engage.

▲masklinn 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

V2L will also do the trick, although it's more annoying.

If power loss is a regular event you probably want V2H, but if it's just a remote fear or something that happens once every 5~10 then V2L and a few extension cords will do.

▲bsimpson 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I camped in a yurt in rural Maine last fall on a motorbiking trip. Needed to keep my phone charged for nav; woke up to find it hadn't charged all the way.

Went looking for the campground host and bumped into another camper, who was pissed the power went out. "Don't worry though - if you need to charge something, you can put it in my truck."

Ended up on a phone charging expedition that landed me in a local library for the first time since I was a child.

Came back and met the host: "Sorry about the power last night - some dumbass tried to charge his truck and tripped the breaker to the whole campground."

▲NetMageSCW 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I would definitely be carrying a battery pack or two if going on a rural motorbike trip.

▲mikestew 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Charging a truck does that? What's that campground going to do with someone plugs in their 50A 43 foot-long tour bus RV?

(I'm sure there's more to the story, and the details aren't important, but if charging a vehicle is tripping breakers for the whole campground there's something wrong.)

▲mcculley 7 hours ago | parent [-]

“yurt in rural Maine” did not convey RV glamping to me.

▲ 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
▲mikestew 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, probably not your typical campground, now that you mention that detail. Still, something seems off, but here I go down a rabbit hole that isn't important to the original comment.

▲josephcsible 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If pulling 24 amps through a TT-30 or 40 amps through a 14-50 trips a breaker, then it's the host's fault for the campground having a shoddy electrical system, not the truck driver's fault.

▲rootusrootus 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Approximately zero campgrounds have the capacity to charge more than one EV. They are sized for intermittent loads, just because it uses a 14-50 does not mean it is intended to support 80% steady draw.

▲colejohnson66 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Is that not the point of a 14-50 socket? To say that you can draw 50 amps? If you can't supply 50 amps without tripping a breaker, don't install a 50 amp socket.

▲rootusrootus 3 hours ago | parent [-]

At the risk of saying something obvious, the socket and the breaker are sized for the peak load, not for average load. A typical home might have 300-400 amps if you total up all the breakers even though the mains are 200A or even 100A.

Also, a bog standard 14-50 is likely not suited for 80% steady EV usage anyway. They make EV-rated 14-50s now because people keep melting the older ones. And that happens even though the vast majority of chargers won't draw more than 32A on a 14-50 due to the historical popularity of using 40A breakers for a 14-50 receptacle.

▲arrowleaf 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Lol in what world? Campgrounds routinely have next to no funding, if they even have power pedestals I wouldn't expect them to be wired for anything more than an RV.

▲josephcsible 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The entire reason we have so many different types of receptacles is so to keep you from plugging in something that the circuit can't handle. They shouldn't be giving people 14-50's if they don't have 50A peak and 40A continuous available. (There is a code exception to only allow 40A peak/32A continuous to a 14-50, but that's all most portable EV chargers draw anyway, so I doubt it even met that. And TT-30 offers no such exception at all.)

▲hnav 40 minutes ago | parent [-]

Since the whole campground went dark, presumably it was the main breaker. The branch circuit must be sized to the outlet type, but the total rating of all branch circuits usually exceeds the main breaker rating.

▲epistasis 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is nothing specific to the CyberTruck; 123 kWh is a lot of battery but a better use would be to add home solar and then you're completely self-sufficient in addition to saving tons of money.

Of course there are two issues that are completely solveable if we had reasonable governance:

1. Adopting an Australia-style solar installation regulation and permitting scheme, which is literally 1/5th tho cost of the US method, and pays their tradespeolpe higher salaries than US workers get

2. Allowing EVs to feed back into the grid. This is something that naysayers would never be useful because nobody would ever want to waste battery cycles on their home. Which of course has always been nonsense. Don't buy EVs without this basic capability, IMHO.

▲brightball 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I’ve looked at solar so many times and I’d love to get it…I just can’t make the math work based on the quotes I always end up getting.

▲epistasis 6 hours ago | parent [-]

That's entirely due to the US scheme, where utilities have ensured that it won't make sense nearly everywhere. Which is then combined with the asinine permitting situation in the US, where every city and county does something on their own without any order or sense.

This combines to ensure that any solar installer will do lots of very expensive things: 1) have a large sales force to close the sale, which last I looked accounted for 30%-40% of the overall cost of solar in the US, 2) roll out trucks many different times during the planning and install, each costing lots of money, 3) never have to compete with a bunch of other hyper-competitive installers and find efficiencies like batching installs together in the same general area.

There are also massively high solar PV tariffs in the US, more than tripling the cost of the panels, but that's not even that big compared to the rest of the needless inefficiency in the system.

▲wilkystyle 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Got it, so stick to the cybertruck if you're in the US.

▲epistasis 5 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I wouldn't say that's the case unless you have free dollars that work for the cyber truck and not for solar panels.

▲muddi900 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The now defunct fully electric Ford F150 Lightning also had the feature.

This is a pretty common feature in High capacity cars.

Even my mid-range BYD came with power strip attachment so you run basic electrical appliance with it.

▲brightball 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Yea, I hate that the Lightning didn’t work out. I loved the vehicle when I test drove it. I just couldn’t justify the price for the range.

▲rootusrootus 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah if you have to tow long distances it's not an ideal choice. Under normal use I get 250-350 miles (lower end for high speed cruising, higher for surface roads), which has been plenty. And at 50K (brand new) it was cheaper than any of the comparable gas versions. The unexpected bonus was that it hasn't depreciated much at all in the last few years.

▲segfaultex 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They're a great used buy. I get ~315 miles out of mine with mostly highway driving. Paid $45K for a platinum.

▲muddi900 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

All American car makers did not take lessons from Tesla's successes. It seems not even Tesla

▲maerF0x0 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are cheaper, more reliable, and easily repaired generators though.

▲victorbojica 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But can they also be driven?

▲paxy 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can drive a $30K car and have a $10K backup power system.

An $80K-100K car that replaces the two isn't some genius purchase.

Sure you can spend all the money you want on a luxury toy, nothing wrong with it, but it's weird trying to justify it as anything but that.

▲epistasis 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That $30k car could be an EV, too, and be part of the backup power system.

In Australia, $10k would buy not only a ton of solar panels but also batteries. The US has decided to make solar and batteries at the home super expensive, unnecessarily.

▲jvanderbot 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What you've shown is that there is a crossover where a gas car + generator beats an electric car.

That doesn't mean electric cars shouldn't be considered as power backup, or that buying a nice electric car vs a nice gas car doesn't come with the added benefit of "Don't need a 10k generator anymore".

▲mirmor23 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> That doesn't mean electric cars shouldn't be considered as power backup, or that buying a nice electric car vs a nice gas car doesn't come with the added benefit of "Don't need a 10k generator anymore".

From redundancy perspective, a genset + car is hands down a better combo. A functional ICE car is cheaper and goes everywhere without any trip planning around charging stations, which is another plus.

▲cloverich 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If cost is your only factor yes. But the vast majority of people pick cars they like, and EV's are great. No need to dog on them needlessly. The trip planning thing is super overblown. Now 2 years into my first EV, going to a charger that's not my house _at all_ is quite rare - couple times a year; even when I travel Portland to Seattle, I don't have to stop on the way such that outside Olympia, I don't even know where the charge stations are. And that's the worst it'll ever be.

▲mirmor23 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> and EV's are great. No need to dog on them needlessly. The trip planning thing is super overblown.

I never said EV is not great and it is nice that it is working out for you, but facts are facts. Also, while EV footprint is growing around the globe, there is wide vast world beyond USA where charging issue is still true (and the repair shops).

▲cguess 6 hours ago | parent [-]

There's a vast world in the US where charging is still an issue. I live in an apartment in a major city with no garage or parking lot, so owning an EV would be very difficult, since there's no way to charge residentially. Or if you're on call, in a rural area, where charging at home might not leave you with enough charge to drive across the county without notice.

▲scottyah 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

ICE cars are barely cheaper, almost never over any span of time due to cost of ownership, and there's no trip planning around charging. It's clear you've never done a road trip in a Tesla. Almost all Tesla owners have had ICE cars first, not sure who you're trying to convince here with your lies.

▲mirmor23 2 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

▲jvanderbot 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean presenting one set of tradeoffs just shows that there are tradeoffs.

If you're looking at two $55,000 cars, and one has power interconnect and one does not, it's not like adding a $1000-$10,000 generator on top is somehow immediately better unless you're adding in factors that make it better (like buying a cheaper car). There's 3 or 4 superchargers within a few miles of my house, and every time I've lost power I could easily go charge my car so I never worried about that.

Not everyone lives in that situation or has the same "one or two days without local power but chargers still work" threat model. It just so happens that's been the biggest actual, real, problem that my car could have fixed for me.

▲alala-lala-lon 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲Grombobulous 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

An Ioniq 5 is not a $80-100k car, though. The difference in cost between it and an equivalent gas car is less than $10k.

▲cloverich 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Carmax has used 2025 SEL Ioniq 5's with 10-15k miles for 33k; that's practically new. Other than the ICCU issue, probably the best electric deal rn? 84kwh battery, I've can drive it Portland to Seattle on 2/3 of a charge.

▲jmb99 7 hours ago | parent [-]

My generator was $1000 and can power my entire house (including server rack). If I bought it used it would’ve been $500. I can trivially store 2 weeks worth of gasoline (and I do, constantly) and as long as somewhere within 700km of my house has gasoline I can get there, refill, and get home. I own 6 gas cars and they total less than $33k. My daily I paid $2500 for and average 6L/100km. (All CAD) If you start taking used cars into account the math goes waaaaaay towards gasoline car + generator.

▲Grombobulous 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Does this also factor in operating costs of the vehicle? Especially considering gasoline at $4-7/gallon?

Then there’s also the potential scenario of “buyer prefers an EV anyway.”

In my case I’m currently driving a ~10 year old conventional gasoline vehicle that I purchased new, and I plan to keep driving it for roughly another 7-10 years. Given the current automotive product lineups out there I can’t think of a scenario where my next car will involve gasoline regardless of my desire for a backup power source at home.

▲jmb99 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> Does this also factor in operating costs of the vehicle? Especially considering gasoline at $4-7/gallon?

Depends on the vehicle of course. But for me at least, my 5-speed Civic for $2500 is way cheaper over its expected lifespan than a $7000 Nissan Leaf (and the Civic is way more flexible, since it can actually go more than 100km every 6 hours in the winter). At $1.50/L and 6L/100km, I can drive about 50,000km before I spend more on gasoline than the price difference between the two. The actual breakeven math (assuming 21kWh/100km) is closer to about 65,000km when factoring in electricity at ~$0.12/kWh. Oil changes are negligible (I do my own maintenance and oil changes), and a used Leaf is going to have just as many problems (if not more) with "the rest of the car" as a gas car (suspension, steering, brakes, tires, electrics, interior components, not to mention battery pack services).

If you buy a nicer EV than the break even point goes even further out. At least where I am, the EV equivalent of any gasoline car has a breakeven point of at least 50k km driven, usually more.

> Then there’s also the potential scenario of “buyer prefers an EV anyway.”

Entirely fair, but I'd still buy a generator and an EV. Because coupling your house power to your car just seems like a bad idea (to rely on it, at least; if you live somewhere that you never need to rely on off-grid power, then who really cares). For instance, my house has a sump pump that must run every ~hour or my basement will flood, and during storms that gets down to about 20 minutes. If my area doesn't have power, then I can't charge an EV anywhere nearby, and if I'm powering the house off the EV, how am I going to recharge it without my basement flooding?

▲rootusrootus 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> 5-speed Civic for $2500

Good grief, what year is that Civic from? LOL. I just bought a 10 year old Corolla for my kid and it was 12 grand. Civics aren't much cheaper.

▲dd8601fn 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Out of curiosity, what do you normally do about the gasoline? I ask because I had a crappy little generator, and it seemed like my most common issue was old gas in the thing. Wasn’t a big deal or anything, just curious… stabil and run them regularly whether you need it or not?

▲jmb99 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Fortunately there's a couple (literally 2) gas stations near me that sell ethanol-free 91 octane gas, which has a shelf life of ~1 year. Sta-bil in theory extends that substantially longer. My solution is Sta-bil in the E0 gas, which gets used throughout the year for small engines (lawn mower, snowblower, pressure washer) and the generator if needed. I power up the generator once a month to make sure its battery stays charged and fuel keeps flowing (probably overkill). My power goes out 2-3 times a year, so that combined with the small engine stuff is enough to cycle through the gas in ~1 year, but if it isn't, I'll either burn it in the generator or just run it in one of my cars.

If you live in an area where you can only get ethanol gas, then you definitely don't want it sitting more than 6 months, even with Sta-bil (in my experience). So that means yeah, you gotta cycle through the generator's tank twice a year, which if you live in an area with reliable power, means spending more money than you need to on gas and oil. Also, keep all containers (including fuel tanks) as full as possible, to minimize the amount of air in the container, to minimize the amount of moisture the ethanol can suck out of the air.

▲paimapi 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The cost of my 2015 Subaru Forester is apparently around 7k. A gas powered generator is 2-3k (and can be refilled with quick trips to the nearest usable gas station) and you can also pair it with a solar-powered one with panels for 3k.

That puts the total setup price to about 10% of a CT-Energy station.

▲Grombobulous 7 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s a used car that’s more than halfway through the median lifespan of a vehicle.

We could start comparing used EVs if we want to.

▲paimapi 7 hours ago | parent [-]

And I could buy a hybrid that's only a few years old for 20k? I mean, it's still a magnitude less than the CT which is what I'm responding to. The idea that the CT miraculously saved a certain family from disaster and was thus worth the 100k investment is just silly.

▲Grombobulous 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I am confused why you think I’m defending the Cybertruck, I’m saying that a used ~$20k EV plus the equipment needed to hook it up to your house would probably satisfy most people’s desire for a generator.

Personally I never really understood the value of a generator in the first place but that’s just my opinion.

▲rootusrootus 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> An $80K-100K car

See, your problem is assuming that the EV is 80-100K. Or that the ICE car is 30K. This is a contrived comparison. An average new car is well over 30K. And I bought a brand new Lightning for 50K. Being able to use 131kWh of battery for things other than driving is a pleasant bonus, and I prefer it to having a gas generator I have to keep maintained and store fuel for.

▲DubiousPusher 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I have a champion tri-fuel that cost < $1k which runs essentially my whole house. It's plumbed into my natural gas so as long as that is up (it has never gone out), I don't even have to refill it.

▲thijson 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I read somewhere that it's a big deal if a natural gas network runs out of gas because then air can get into the system. That can lead to explosions, so they have to systematically purge the entire network.

▲c0nsumer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We have the same. $2K generator, while house transfer switch, natural gas hookup. Guess we'll never have a power failure again, since we just got a new generator.

▲80fj0348i 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes. Many electric cars and trucks have this feature.

▲marcosdumay 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You an drive almost every EV that has that feature too.

Or rather, you can take half of the difference in price and install some proper PV + battery system in your house that can be used when there's isn't a catastrophe too.

▲danans 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No, but because they can't be driven, your house stays powered when someone goes for a drive.

▲trial3 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

you're inventing the alternator from first principles

▲slowin 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No, that's what my car is for. You can't drive your cybertruck when it's running your refrigerator. Wrong tool for the job.

▲bluGill 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is an emergency. I'll compromise in an emergency. My fridge can sit unpowered for a couple hours while I'm driving, and that is all I need to drive anyway.

If there is a major outage most bosses understand that you won't be working normally because you need to deal with the emergency.

▲alala-lala-lon 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[dead]

▲jmb99 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The amount of money you spent on a cybertruck could’ve instead been spent on a generator, gasoline for the generator, and a car to go buy gasoline for the generator. Or, battery packs & solar panels, and a generator, and gasoline for the generator, and a car to go buy gasoline for the generator. That car could even be an EV, just a much more efficient one.

▲bluGill 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't think anyone buys a cybertruck for this ability. But if you have one this is a nice bonus and the additions too use it this was are less than a generator

▲win311fwg 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The power being delivered on wheels that go with you is the whole point. A permanently affixed generator doesn't help get power out into the middle of the field when I need to do things like weld farm equipment. There are plenty of solutions out there, but the power source and truck carrying the tools being one and the same would be quite attractive if the aforementioned problems were solved.

▲bob1029 8 hours ago | parent [-]

> the middle of the field when I need to do things like weld farm equipment

There is an entire genre of welding equipment designed for this scenario.

https://bakersgas.com/collections/miller-engine-driven-weldi...

▲win311fwg 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Exactly why the power source being the truck I already own anyway is far more appealing, at least it would be if the aforementioned problems were solved. Special tools come with special costs that don't really make sense most of the time.

▲deadbabe 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What if they also made the cybertruck capable of refrigeration.

▲slowin 5 hours ago | parent [-]

They're not going to be making any sort of cybertruck anymore.

▲chadash 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is obviously not the primary reason to get a Telsa. But a full home generator will run you $15k to buy and install where i live, and a whole bunch of hassle to install with permits. I don't have one because my power doesn't go out that much. But if i'm otherwise on the fence about a vehicle, I would absolutely want this as a feature.

▲MrDOS 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Maybe a generator sized to run a regular home in perpetuity, but I bet it's much, much less than that to have an electrician install a GenerLink and to buy a regular portable generator just powerful enough to run your fridge and freezer.

▲hedora 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In our area, when a storm hit, the roads washed out, so the generators ran out of propane. Then the local propane companies ran out of delivery truck capacity because of the demand surge. Finally, the regional distributors ran out of propane.

Our solar panels kept the fridge running, but we were heating the house with a wood stove (it was very cloudy, so we were getting maybe an hour of sun a day). If we had bidirectional house charging, we could have had warm showers + used the heat pump: We would have been able to fast-charge the car at 100-200kw in town. The house can limp through 20-30 hours on ~ 25kwh, so the charger would charge the house at a few days per hour, including losses from driving to and from town + round tripping through the battery, and also running the house heat pump.

None of the other people around here stayed online. Some propane-dependent people had no electricity for > 2 weeks (with rationing, they managed to keep their generators online for about a week, and PG&E took three weeks to fix their lines).

This was in the outskirts of Silicon Valley, so better-than-puerto-rico infrastructure, but only just.

▲ryandrake 6 hours ago | parent [-]

This is a total failure/incompetence of multiple utility institutions that we all pay for and depend on. An electric company that does not have the capacity to respond quickly to natural disasters and propane delivery infrastructure that doesn't have the reserves to weather such an event. Even a day without electricity should be unacceptable in a modern, functional society. How do we tolerate 2 weeks? I bet the CEOs of these companies are not going without electricity for 2 weeks.

We are far away from, but slowly approaching, Mad Max levels of institutional failure, and everyone seems to treat it as normal and unavoidable.

▲mikestew 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You forgot "higher maintenance" that goes along with seldom-used things that run on gas. That gas doesn't drain itself, and if you don't do that, well, Amazon has carbs for Honda generators for $30. For something I might use once a year. No, thanks.

▲kube-system 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ford had EV trucks that could do that before Tesla did.

▲NathanielK 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The ford home integration setup never really worked as advertised. The idea is that if the home power fails, the truck will output high voltage DC to an inverter that powers the house. No owners have got this failing over reliably.

Most people just plug an extension cord into the onboard inverter. You have to manually flip it on and plug it in, but 240V30A is plenty for an emergency. Doing it this way isn't any different from any other vehicle with an onboard inverter though.

▲pocksuppet 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's completely illegal unless your home has a "transfer switch" (manual or automatic) installed for this purpose - and if you're plugged into the generator side of a transfer switch, then you can't charge the truck, only discharge it. There are probably modules designed for solar power that allow two-way transfer safely.

On the other hand there are no tricky rules for an electric truck to have extra power outlets in it.

▲pythonaut_16 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'd expect a lot of people might just use extension cords and plug critical devices directly into the truck.

▲NathanielK 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Bingo. Unsurprisingly, the ford system is basically an off the shelf solar system minus the panels and with a very tiny battery to kickstart the system.

▲thesuitonym 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Do cybertrucks work any differently?

▲NathanielK 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I believe they use the vehicle's onboard inverter rather than an external one.

▲kendkwncowncn 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No one is saying they can’t. Drop the whataboutism, please.

▲samdixon 8 hours ago | parent [-]

The whole GP is irrelevant to the article regardless. Point being, what does it matter that the cybertruck has this feature when it's a not unique and b irrelevant to why it failed.

The whole comment comes across as an AI agent that is lacking severe human context by posting a complete non-sequitur, regardless if it is actually an agent or not.

▲brightball 6 hours ago | parent [-]

It was an article about the end of the Cybertruck. It’s my one story about a Cybertruck so I thought I’d share.

First time I’ve been compared to an AI agent.

▲samdixon 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah sorry - that's an overly negative take. It's just odd to me the TOP comment on a post about the cybertruck winding down is a random anecdote about it's battery backup capabilities, lol.

▲alt227 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Do they now?

▲dragontamer 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I know its been a few years, but the Cybertruck has been an epic disaster.

Cybertruck was announced first. Then Ford _released_ the F150 Lightning, including the ability to operate as a backup battery for a house. And a dozen or so months later, Cybertruck comes out at a much higher price than F150 Lightning ever was.

▲kamranjon 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think they might be commenting on the fact that the f150 lightning has been cancelled for some time now

▲alt227 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> the Cybertruck has been an epic disaster

As has the F150 lightning. It lost so much money and demand was so low that Ford had to kill it to stop bleeding money.

▲scottyah 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Has it? It was the R&D car and really cut the costs of developing the robotaxi that they're going all-in on. 48v wiring, ethernet hub, giant casting tech, and a lot more.

▲brightball 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The price point on the Cybertruck and the Lightning were comparable, particularly if you price based on range.

▲ 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲overfeed 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> They may be ugly, but the emergency prepper in me always wanted one after hearing that story

If all you're after is the V2L feature, you can get it for much cheaper: for 16% of the price of a Cybertruck, you can get 86% of the battery capacity (about 8 powerwalls) by buying a used Fisker Ocean Extreme with a 107kWh battery, vs. the cybertruck's 123kWh

▲BikiniPrince 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ford did the same thing, but that truck was built during the height of parts shortages.

Ford came in and bought up all of the parts from our suppliers and I had to qual random suppliers for weeks. Even at the time, I was thinking there is too much disparity and this will haunt us for years.

We were a bit more agile and I made a lot of kernel hacks to compensate.

Ford didn’t fare better for all their choices. Recalls galore. Honestly, they made my life hell so fuck em.

On to the truck, they had a proprietary charger and power wall solution but it could run the house for days.

▲tonmoy 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If that’s the only thing you care about you can DIY (or buy dedicated battery backup systems) with 10x more capacity for the same price. With heavier but cheaper Na-ion batteries in the horizon near future backup systems will be even better

▲Galanwe 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Battery capacity is just one side of the equation. You also need a strong output capacity otherwise you won't much. Also if you are to inject current in your network like that, then you need at least a source inverter to isolate yourself from the grid, otherwise it would most likely be illegal and very dangerous for technicians and neighbors. Also

▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲whyenot 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The F150 hybrid is/was also supposed to be really good for this, and when the battery ran down, the engine would switch on and recharge it. So, you were not dependent on a super charger. All you needed is a working gas station. (This is based on an old video from Alex on Autos). So, you could buy a vehicle that is both cheaper and doesn't look like a dumpster and still be able to do this.

▲johnshahbazian 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are the battery compartments water proof? We got hit by a hurricane a few years ago, and a few nearby teslas caught on fire from the floodwaters, torching people's houses.

▲ta2112 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Huh. That's pretty cool! Now I'm wondering about the potential to do this with any EV. Something to research.

▲ 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲MSKJ 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've always like their look, and I feel the hate on them is more due to Elon and it being a Tesla which is fair.

Weird looking truck, glad they took the risk

▲kbelder an hour ago | parent [-]

Yeah, I don't know if I like the look, but I'm glad to see something that's at least different.

▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲strangattractor 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Did Ford have Truck that did that and I am pretty sure a new and improved version is coming with the new Phantom.

▲philjohn 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Hyundai/Kia E-GMP platform cars also support this (V2L), as do quite a few others.

▲j2kun 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is a feature on many new electric vehicles (such as the Kia EV 9). The obstacle is often the power company, which may require modifying your system to enable this.

▲wmchen 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I believe this but I'm curious how this works specifically? Did the home already have a transfer switch of some kind?

▲srmatto 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is becoming a standard called V2H (Vehicle-to-Home) and doesn't require a Cybertruck.

▲dogscatstrees 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Ford F-150 Lightning has always been able to do that, way before the Tesla cars enabled vehicle-to-load (V2L).

▲tintor 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just buy a diesel generator. Much simpler tech and more reliable in emergencies.

▲skizm 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can you do this with other normal EVs? I assume they'd have lower capacity, but just getting some power for your fridge, wifi, and chargers might be worth.

▲alistairSH 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In theory, yes, but they need to have the hardware/firmware to do it. Pretty sure most of the full-size electric trucks do so, but not sure about any of the smaller crossover EVs.

You also need to have the house setup to run off a generator. You don't want the truck power feeding back into the grid. IIRC, that's usually done with a big switch near the main panel.

▲largbae 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No, you can't even do it with most other Teslas. Current models will give you 20A of 120V out from the battery, but most don't have an inverter big enough.

There is a model of Ford Lightning that has power sharing and now that resale values are way down it just might be a cost effective home battery that you can drive around during non-emergencies....

▲NathanielK 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The power sharing in the lightning requires a discontinued home charger and several thousand in extra inverters and other home infrastructure to do the power share trick.

You can also just plug into the 30A240V bed plug and use the onboard inverter on the lightning or powerboost hybrid f150 with less headache.

▲Bilal_io 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can do it with multiple EVs. The KIA EV9 is one of them.

▲ 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲doctoboggan 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sort of. With my Kia EV9 I can use a V2L adapter to run an extension cord for essential items in my home. I understand in other markets there is a V2H connector so you can connect it to your home mains power but I don’t think it’s available in the US

▲Bilal_io 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, I used mine in July 2024 to power my fridge and a couple of items when I lost power in Texas. Unfortunately the V2H requires a setup that I don't have.

▲ 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲cyberax 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In theory, it requires ONLY firmware changes. V2G/V2H works by establishing a "fast charging session" that directly connects the inverter to the high-voltage bus. And then it just siphons off the energy from the battery instead of charging it.

Car makers are reluctant to support this. In case of Tesla because of market segmentation.

▲IncreasePosts 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Vehicle to Home(V2H) is unfortunately not super common, but it is being added to a lot of newer models this year and beyond.

▲bob1029 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What are the chances that the supercharger station even has power after a hurricane? You want something that is already on the property. I've had roads blocked by fallen trees for days after a windstorm event.

If you are concerned about riding through a 14 day+ event you need a generator. Even a fully off-grid solar / wind setup could be compromised in these kinds of storms. I've seen entire roofs cleaned off by a <100mph storm. Anything not bolted down to a concrete slab cannot be depended on.

▲nashashmi 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

High. They typically need heavy power lines that are either underground or way up overhead.

▲ 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲jonhohle 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Many EVs can do the same thing.

It’s unclear to me how a vehicle battery can be 9-10x the size of a house battery, be used as a house battery, include an highway safe cabin, motors and wheels and only cost 4x what a single home battery costs. Oh, and at least Kia rates their battery warranty based on miles driven, so using it as a home battery does not impact any 10-year capacity guarantees.

AI tells me they are completely different though, so I must be missing something.

▲cogman10 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What you are missing is home batteries have INSANE markups.

5kWh of battery cells at the moment run around $500. The rest of the cost of production is in the power electronics (probably around another $500).

It's why you can buy 4kwh worth of battery backups from Amazon for about $2k right now. Yet the same thing sold as a home battery backup costs $5k.

Lack of competition and likely low amount of sells is what's causing the margins to be so high.

▲jasonwatkinspdx 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Right now it's largely a vanity product sadly.

▲hedora 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Permitting in California more than doubles the installation cost of home batteries + PG&E gets to screw with you if you buy one.

Propane generators here have the same problem.

That still doesn't explain the price gap. You can literally just get a V2H EV and use it instead of a home battery (or, you could if the ecosystem was more mature).

▲pocksuppet 7 hours ago | parent [-]

If it's wired to the grid I presume. So if it's just for emergencies, don't wire it to the grid.

▲twoWhlsGud 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Good question - different markets with different margins and supply chains?

▲ 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲horsawlarway 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The answer is mostly that the powerwall is an incredibly overpriced home battery.

They want ~9k for a freaking 13.5kwh pack.

I can buy a UL certified, 16kwh, outdoor rated pack for 3.5k (ex - EG4 allweather)

I can buy just the LFP batteries themselves for the new powerwall 3 LFP version (no BMS, no shell, no certification) for $1116... https://18650battery.com/products/byd-302ah-3-2v-lifepo4-pri...

Powerwall is a scammy product. WAY too expensive for the storage it provides.

---

So the summary is: Cybertruck is using a different battery chemistry, Powerwall is a scam.

(I mean - to be clear, the Cybertruck is also a scam, but it's a different kind of scam not directly related to the battery capacity, since it's hauling around a 123kWh NCMA battery pack)

▲cogman10 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Wasn't aware of EG4 on the market now. Good. So many of the older home backup producers have ridiculous markups on their batteries.

▲TheSockStealer 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think "recycling" cybertrucks in this manner, basically to reuse their batteries, may give them a more practical afterlife then when they were a truck.

▲TheSockStealer 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I just checked and prices are going to have to come way down. Who is buying a 2024 Cybertruck for $70k+?

▲annoyingnoob 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Try an F150 Lightning with the Extended Battery

▲Topfi 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Very few, I would imagine. Pricing is just divorced from reality (as in, the point where you'd be able to successfully sell one in a reasonable amount of time), the "I know what I have" stubbornness that is pervasive among a certain type of seller to their own detriment. Pure speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if this specific car basically self selects for that type of person.

[0] https://caredge.com/tesla/cybertruck/depreciation

▲SoftTalker 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Recycling them to make saucepans from the stainless steel would give them a more practical afterlife then when they were a truck.

▲zippyman55 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not bad. The shell would also make a nice BBQ.

▲bko 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's a cool car. I'm glad it exists. All SUVs look almost identical. I'm glad it was different, not for everyone but it was an attempt to make something innovative in a very stale market.

It's exhausting reading these kinds of articles from a tech publication none the less. It's just so negative. Here is a summary of paragraphs:

Cybertruck is ceasing production

Here's a mean tweet from some X account with 2,649 followers: "Fuck that shitbox"

The car rusts sometimes

Truck sold very few units

Even with low sales they're still going down

Wildly unpopular with design flaws

Mention embarrassing demo from 7 years ago

It just goes on, truly exhausting.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a36715409/why-does-...

▲tw04 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can do the same thing with an f150 or Silverado ev and won’t have to drive around in a discontinued rolling doorstop.

https://www.f150lightningforum.com/forum/threads/franklinwh-...

https://gmenergy.gm.com/vehicle-to-home

▲michaelt 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> They may be ugly, but the emergency prepper in me always wanted one after hearing that story.

The cybertruck is $70k, which in a 14-day power outage is $5000 a day.

There are cheaper options to weather such a storm. Like flying first class to New York, getting a limo to the Central Park Ritz-Carlton and spending 14 days being waited on hand and foot.

▲ 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲Robdel12 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The F-150 powerboost is perfect for this and has existed before the Cybertruck. https://www.nucarfordtilton.com/f-150-powerboost-explained/ big bonus, you get a real truck with it too. That can do real truck things.

▲polymork 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A real pepper would want a car that runs on gas with a carburated engine and is also a common car. Not a niche one off that requires fussy infrastructure just to refuel.

▲idlewords 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Counterpoint: I live off-grid and am thankful I can just power my house with batteries instead of a massive car that looks like a Dumpster

▲jethro_tell 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A cyber truck as a prepper rig is laughable. EV's do a lot of things well, but if it's a prepper rig, you'd need to have a generator and the fuel set aside to charge it. You can't assume that there will be power near by. If there is power, you can't assume that you will have access to one of the relatively few chargers available.

You can get a generator that will get the job done for under 1000 bucks and you can store diesel or propane to get the job done.

That's before we factor in the likelyhood needing to travel quite a distance (and assume there is no access to grid power), and that you won't have any of the cybertruck defeating issues like heavy rains or standing water that might void it's warranty and fry it's electronics.

A prepper rig is a mechanical diesel that can be roll started or hand cranked without batteries, has no electronics to get fried except the radio, and can burn almost any combustible fuel source on hand. Slap a 200 Gallon transfer tank on the back and keep it full and you can drive across the country without fueling up. And if you also have that diesel generator to power your house, you've got a years worth of fuel for that generator.

You can get all that done for around 25k USD, so, not sure how a cyber truck even enters the conversation.

▲scosman 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A gas generator is a lot more flexible in this situation, and under $500.

▲27183 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Generally a propane generator is a wiser, more reliable backup option. Propane doesn't go bad, and in disaster scenarios often the sun isn't shining or your solar panels could be damaged. Solar + battery is a good system when the weather is good and everything is going well, but for a fallback system a propane generator can't be beat.

▲mrj 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, this is where I landed, too. Except propane bottles only get me about 3-4 hours per bottle and it's pricey. It ran $50 for one day of AC during the last outage.

I just bought a kit to convert to natural gas though. Most people who've done it are happy to not change bottles all the time. It won't help after an earthquake but the regular PSPS outages I get make natural gas a better fit for the moment.

▲iamnothere 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not everyone lives somewhere with natural gas service, and gas service could also go out in some types of disasters.

It’s possible to get larger propane tanks and refill them more cheaply (rather than exchanging expensive grill tanks at the store). Some hardware stores will refill tanks directly. You can even get very large tanks (refilled by a truck that comes to your house) if you want weeks of power on tap. But this is probably overkill for most, unless you’re very remote.

▲mrj 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I tried that but services want regular deliveries and aren't interested in refilling emergency tanks. And a tank large enough for decent power backup will be hard to move.

▲iamnothere 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah, ok. They make auto-change regulators that allow you to hook up two tanks, and two 30-60lb cylinders should last quite a while. But if you have natural gas service and aren’t in an earthquake or hurricane zone then that’s probably better.

▲alt227 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Im not sure AC is the sort of thing most people are thinking about needing power for in an emergency or disaster scenario, its one of the most power hungry things you can use.

▲jermaustin1 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As a person in the deep south where summer temps are over 100F and RH is in the 80s, having a generator powered window unit in our smallest room is more necessary than even the fridge. Thankfully the window units only pull 400-500w or so, so even a small dual-fuel running propane would run all day on a 20lb tank.

This is a common enough occurrence in rural Louisiana, at least. And I think almost everyone I know has a 200gal or larger propane tank in their yard, specifically for multiday outages. My father-in-law doesn't have a single propane appliance, but he does have a 250gal tank, for his generac.

We don't we have a single 100lb tank, but that will run the little AC for 3 or 4 days.

▲mrj 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

During the last outage my neighbor had to leave his house because of the temperature. He had a generator running for days (off of the natural gas line) so I thought he was fine, but his old AC wouldn't start so he texted me as he was leaving to stay at a hotel.

This is important enough to me that I researched slow start AC units ~8 years ago when replacing my AC. I learned that almost any heat pump will do, so that's what I have.

▲80fj0348i 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In large areas of the US if your AC goes out during the summer you can be dead within a day or two. There's many deaths of elderly people annually when their AC failed and they didn't have the mobility to leave for a cooling center before they passed out.

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/heat-waves-and-annual-death-ra...

▲alt227 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Thats crazy to me. I would never live in an area where electric power is required just to exist and not die.

▲ifwinterco 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's not so much the temperature per se, it's the fact modern houses are designed around AC and American houses in particular are basically giant wooden garden sheds.

In a traditional house with thick brick/stone walls and large roof overhangs you'd be uncomfortable but a lot less likely to die

▲27183 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It would be smart (assuming a properly insulated and air sealed house--which to your point is uncommon in the US) to build an insulated room with a dedicated hvac zone in the center of the basement or somewhere similar that is basically your "safe room" for such a situation. Would not take much to cool it and has the advantage of being maximally distant from the exterior walls to in case you are worried about radioactive fallout ;)

▲80fj0348i 3 hours ago | parent [-]

For most people their car would work fine, of course not everyone does drive. Sometimes cities will open "cooling centers" (school gyms, event venues, etc.) for those cases.

▲27183 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It takes a large amount of fuel to keep a car cool (or warm) compared to a properly insulated interior room in a properly insulated house. Cars have almost no thermal insulation to speak of, just sound deadening material, and they're made of thermally conductive materials.

▲ 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲ 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲asadotzler 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We got a 500 gal propane tank. Get it topped off every so often, can power two large portables and one built in generator for longer than we've ever needed, even close to it.

▲Scene_Cast2 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm looking into getting a large EV so I can move off of a propane generator. A generator needs service, it will cut power for 5-10 seconds while it starts up (so your PCs and whatnot will power cycle), and it's loud.

▲scarecrowbob 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I live off grid and only have solar because it was cheaper than the wire.

Also, I built it myself so the labor costs aren't included but I am about $8k into a system (4kw of panels, 6kw inverter, 15kwH battery).

I personally wouldn't be able to make vehicle cheaper than having no grid tie. I get that the costs are different once you include labor. Also I am on 40acres so the panel set could be ground mounted.

But to make something commensurable with a propane home-powering generator seems a lot more do-able.

▲iamnothere 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Always a good idea to have a UPS, even if you don’t have a generator, to protect your home computers from transient outages, power flickers, or grid voltage fluctuations.

▲jmull 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Won't an EV have maintenance costs too? And cost a lot more than a propane generator? And take time to switch over to supply electricity to your house?

The quiter part makes sense, but there are a lot more practical solutions to that too.

▲IncreasePosts 8 hours ago | parent [-]

You (probably) need a car any way. So the choice isn't between an EV or a propane generator - it's between an EV, or (propane generator and a car). With V2H and something like a power wall or other battery backup, when the power goes out you would still have a few hours at normal usage where you can go and plug your car in.

▲kevin42 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm running an EG4 system with a decent amount of battery storage. I have a generator port on it that makes it easy to plug in a portable generator to assist the PV and charge the battery. It's really easy for me to roll my generator over and run it a few hours a day to supplement the solar. Even a cheap 5kW generator is plenty because it doesn't need to power the house, just provide a continuous charge to the batteries.

▲chasd00 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Wouldn’t a diesel or gasoline generator be better? You can carry both in a bucket found on the side of the road which isn’t possible with propane.

▲AshleyGrant 8 hours ago | parent [-]

A diesel generator would definitely be better on paper, but the costs involved are much higher as those are generally a permanent install. A gasoline generator requires much more maintenance around fuel and the carburetor as gasoline goes bad over time and modern gas/petrol with ethanol in it sucks up water from the air. A propane generator, while it is a bit more annoying to refuel, especially if you upgrade to larger tanks, is perfectly happy to sit for 6-12 months unused and then start right up on the tank of fuel that's been sitting next to it for that time period.

A propane generator is a temporary solution but likely is good enough for most folks who just need to keep the fridge cold and maybe charge cell phones. It's not going to be able to run your house AC or anything, though.

▲tarpitt 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I would like to see more vehicle-to-grid capability out of cars, EVs, Hybrids, and Gas Cars alike.

▲sanj 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My F150 Lightning has an even bigger battery pack in it... and a simple 240V outlet.

▲BIGFOOT_EXISTS 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Very cool story! Love hearing neat use cases like this.

▲senderista 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you need to worry about such extended outages, why not just do the normal thing and install propane tanks, a stationary generator, and a transfer switch?

▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲random3 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I powered the house off a much less fancier 4XE Jeep, which has a generator, and so, arguably more versatile as you don't need spend time charging.

▲asadotzler 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can buy the batteries installed at your home, charged during the day with solar or night with a small ICE generator. That plus a real same-class truck still costs considerably less than a CT.

▲rsoto2 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

what about balcony solar power or a turbine? Chances are if your power is knocked out by a storm the closest supercharger also would be.

▲jackmott42 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Other EVs can do this. You don't need one that ended up being twice the price and half the range and not an actual steel exoskeleton as promised.

▲taude 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

why put in powerwalls without local solar panels?

▲b0rtb0rt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

hybrid ford f150 can do this too

▲trgn 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

my jelly neighbor story is that when our neighbors replaced their ice truck with a cybertruck, a calm descended on our block. iso of getting woken up by the rumble of that damn thing when they started it, they just zoomed off, silently. its the first time i internalized that electric vehicles are inherently better than ice. more human.

▲apercu 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can get a lot of backup power for less than 100k.

▲avgDev 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Or you know you could buy a $8k natural gas generator, seems like a really poor justification to buy such an expensive car.

▲nonethewiser 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>The battery capacity on those things is equivalent to 9 Tesla Powerwall units or something close to it.

What the fuck

▲7e 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, drain your car to power your house, so in an extended outage your house will be out of power and you will be stranded. Risk management, people. You don’t know if power will go out in even more places, or stay off for an extended period of time.

▲napierzaza 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]