This has happened with most of the fields - volunteers do a lot of work, make their fields/areas good, raise interest, bring ppl into it which usually brings money then which usually brings money chasers who then usually "optimize" the hell out of every metric for maximum gains.

Great OS volunteers still exist today, but the ratio of genuine field lover to money chaser is absurd now.

▲

cowlevel 2 days ago | parent [-]

Goodhart's law: whatever you measure will improve. And the measurement is money extraction.

▲

jonny2811 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

any measurement that becomes a target ceases to be a useful measurement*

▲

optimalsolver 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's not the definition of Goodhart's law. That's the opposite of Goodhart's law, in fact.

▲

cowlevel 2 days ago | parent [-]

It's exactly Goodhart's law. The measured thing improves.

▲

bigstrat2003 2 days ago | parent [-]

Goodhart's law is that the measured thing increases, not improves. Increasing may in fact be worsening.

▲

cowlevel a day ago | parent [-]

So if I measure accidents, accidents will increase?

	▲	allexsendev a day ago \| parent [-]
		interrupting your thread bcs what the law states directly is less interesting than what it puts the emphasis on: if maxing out measurement becomes the goal, it isn't measuring what it was supposed to. Take a concrete example - original point of schools/academia was education. Eventually grades started measuring education, and now grades are the goal instead of education. ppl started optimizing for grades by any means possible -> grades aren't good measure of education anymore.

▲

palata 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Is there a law that says "whenever something is profitable, people attracted to money will come for the money". And obviously, the best way to make money is not to build good tech.

	▲	cowlevel 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's called capitalism, I think, but it's only one part of capitalism
	▲	allexsendev 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]