| ▲ | lakeviewterrace 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
So they don't actually know what this network is, just who owns the IP space... time for a blog post to advertise our week-old service! There is no evidence that physically ties this to the WH. It could be in a security lab for all they know. Or a guest network for the news media. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Terr_ 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> There is no evidence that physically ties this to the WH. They don't need to be physically inside a specific building to be a networking security problem. The core issue is whether an outsider has bypassed your firewall and can send+receive traffic from a node which is getting more trust than it deserves. If they've compromised the computer's microphone/camera/wifi-control that's an additional problem. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | itishappy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
"We don't know where the devices that appear to have breached the WH network are located. For all we know, they could be in Beijing or Moscow." That seems significantly worse. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 1e1a 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Perhaps ping time measurements could help identify where the devices are physically located. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||