OpenAI naming scheme makes no sense. I get naming is hard but atleast keep it consistent.

I felt like I had a read on it right away – it's a 6[.0]-series model, and not named after space since it's specialist model, and I assumed it was named after Rosalind Franklin. Looks like the docs back that up, that it's based on Astra, which is not [yet?] at 6.1.

▲

deadnomore 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Also why are cards hundreds of pages long? Seems like a broken metaphor.

▲

emil-lp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm a new Claude user. I get to choose between Fable, Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku. Effort medium, extra, max, high.

Makes sense.

	▲	zamadatix an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The only one that doesn't inherently make much sense to me is Fable vs Opus. Beyond that, it's just different sized works at the given effort level.

▲

xp84 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honestly the names of most of the frontier models are just getting more and more confusing. Maybe this one gets a pass for being a specialist model for bio. But it's hard to decide which model to use at this point, especially OpenAI.

▲

varispeed 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably AI came up with the naming scheme ;-P Maybe they used Gemini for that or copilot.