| ▲ | realityfactchex 5 hours ago |
| First of all, open the TV and disconnect the wireless radio from the main board, on mine (Samsung) it was just unplugging one cable (AI or Google it). I dislike doing stuff like that, but it was easy in my case, maybe you'll be lucky, too. Second, never use the "apps" built into the TV. Next, don't plug Ethernet into the TV. Plug HDMI cables into the TV. Use a box of your choice on the other end of the HDMI cables. This is now the box that you trust. (Roku? Shield? Blu-ray? MacBook? PC? Linux? Playstation? XBox? Whatever you want.) The Smart TV itself is now fine. Choose the devices you plug into it to play content. The TV just shows it. |
|
| ▲ | bscphil 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The thing I'd be worried about when doing this is spending $1000+ on a TV, then realizing it has some sort of pre-downloaded ads that it shows on the main screen ("sign up for your free six months of HBO Max!") or otherwise has a nag prompt that appears to tell you to connect to WiFi. I think that would be basically intolerable. |
| |
| ▲ | ericrallen 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Been a few years since I had to get a new one, but I booted mine up, switched to the HDMI input for my AppleTV, and never looked back. Just boots straight into the AppleTV input when you use the AppleTV remote to wake it up. We have to use the actual TV remote to debug some audio issues or disable the motion blur stuff again every once in awhile, but otherwise it might as well just be a display for the AppleTV. I’ve only seen the actual home screen of the TV a handful of times. I guess it’s probably still spying on us somehow, and it seems like different models make using the AppleTV remote and booting right into the AppleTV harder than others, so your mileage may vary. | |
| ▲ | MrDrMcCoy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If its an Android TV, you can use an alternate launcher to avoid home screen ads. |
|
|
| ▲ | drnick1 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > First of all, open the TV and disconnect the wireless radio from the main board This. Never trust software switches. See my other reply for what I suggest instead of "streaming boxes" that aren't any better than the TV firmware. |
| |
| ▲ | kazinator 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So you think that if the TV doesn't have your Wi-Fi password, it surreptititously turns on Wi-Fi and runs cracking software to obtain it anyway? | | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No but things like Amazon sidewalk exist | |
| ▲ | wl 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not that I have any evidence it's happening, but it'd be more likely for TV manufacturers to partner with ISPs that offer public WiFi using the access points they rent to their customers. | |
| ▲ | ethanj8011 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think the more logical concern would be that it would wait until it could find any potential unsecured wifi to use. I live in an apartment building and there a few wifi access points that I can reach from my apartment with no security. Though one of them appears to be an air conditioner?? | |
| ▲ | jellobyte 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Thank you. This is exactly what I was thinking reading people who think you need to do more than simply never connect it to your wifi. | | |
| ▲ | _dain_ 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | it's not just your wifi you have to worry about. neighbour can have insecure wifi. or deliberately open ones like coffee shops, free municipal hotspots, etc. | | |
| ▲ | giancarlostoro an hour ago | parent [-] | | That sounds like a TV manufacturer is going to be having one hell of a lawsuit if they're breaking into other peoples wifi networks. |
|
| |
| ▲ | mmooss an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are available IoT networks it could use, though I don't think all of them run over Wifi. |
| |
| ▲ | intrasight 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Honest question. Do projectors also suffer? | | |
| ▲ | MrDrMcCoy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not from privacy issues, but all the typical ones from projectors never went anywhere: low brightness, high heat, low maximum operating lifetime, fan noise, and hard to set up (impossible in some places). | |
| ▲ | aDyslecticCrow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Faar less. A larger fraction of projectors remain dumb HDMI to light converters. Tis been my own plan if i settle on wanting a tv. | |
| ▲ | sudonem 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If it has any kind of in-built smart TV style OS - then yes. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | kazinator 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > disconnect the wireless radio from the main board Can you explain why you can't just not give the TV your Wi-Fi password? Or are we worried about the case when the TV did have Wi-Fi (due to it being mandatory for some initial setup, say), but we don't trust that "Forget Network" and "Wi-Fi off" are actually honored? Suppose the device surreptitiously reconnects to Wi-Fi in spite of being told to forget it. You may be able to block it in your router and failing that, change the access point password. No? |
| |
| ▲ | gumby 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Xfinity runs an open WiFi for its customers. If you instead their gateway and don’t change anything (which is 99% of users) any Xfinity customer can get online. Several of my neighbors have them, and you can’t walk around in my commercial district without seeing the “Xfinity WiFi” SSID. It would be smart for TV mfrs to do a deal with Xfinity and their equivalents world wide in order to sell viewer data to advertisers and receive “fresh” ads, even if the TVs are excluded from the residential network. | | |
| ▲ | crazybLanKeT 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This is actually so very doable in US, cutting deal with those like XFinity. But if the TV manufacturer is smart in their spying game, they could also be probing for any public SSIDs to connect to when no local internet access is setup. | |
| ▲ | giancarlostoro an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | So your TV just connects to random wifi networks? That sounds a bit insane. | | |
| ▲ | RajT88 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It doesn't sound insane, actually. Keeping in mind, Windows XP did exactly that for a while until everyone realized, "hey, that's a security issue". I would swear MacOS too, but I wouldn't bet money on it. | |
| ▲ | zargon 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | That example isn't a random wifi network, it's the Xfinity network. But also, you think tv manufacturers are sane? They have proven that they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt, in my opinion. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Tyr42 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It might connect to a neighbor's WiFi if it has no password. | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | realityfactchex 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To prevent RF transmission. | |
| ▲ | plagiarist 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | We're worried about it connecting to a neighbor's unsecured network or some sort of unpublished mesh capability for exfiltrating your data and downloading ads. | | |
| ▲ | giancarlostoro an hour ago | parent [-] | | Setup an unprotected network that is isolated and you fully control, see if it connects at all. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | femto 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| HDMI has an Ethernet channel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#HEC Any chance the TV can phone home via that? One would have to make sure the HDMI cable physically doesn't have the Ethernet pairs, or set the trusted box to filter the traffic. |
| |
| ▲ | wtallis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The HDMI standard defines an Ethernet channel as an optional feature. Approximately zero consumer products have ever implemented it. There's no need to worry about an unsuspecting consumer having supporting devices at both ends of the cable. | |
| ▲ | sporedro 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don’t know of any consumer laptops or tv boxes like shield/Apple TV that implement that so that. It’s basically a non-issue unless it’s implemented on the HDMI devices. | |
| ▲ | b112 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you use something you can control, like a Linux box, this isn't an issue. Even if the device did get added, and then udev or network manager auto configured, a firewall script should protect you. |
|
|
| ▲ | Fnoord 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So, I have an Nvidia Shield TV Pro. I dislike how Google had to put ads on the homescreen (ads which are not suitable for my children), and I just checked: it has Android patch level Jan 2026. It is, as of today, Nov 2026. 10 months without patches. So no patch for eMudhra, no patch for Brotli, and you name it. Other than that, I agree regarding TV, with one caveat: you might want to update the firmware right away, or at some point. The device might need to phone home for that. In order to achieve that, you can put up a temp WLAN AP with your smartphone. With regards to my STB: I am considering cancelling all my subscription services and simply downloading everything to my NAS. This already runs Jellyfin. Then all I need is a Jellyfin client and HDMI. Perhaps a RPi 4 or RPi 5 would be suffice there. |
| |
|
| ▲ | zoeysmithe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| While practical advice its just odd to me there's no major legislation or movement or activism or boycotts about this. We just accept our TV might be silently recording everything we say in our home and the fix is to not plug it into the internet. |
|
| ▲ | vexed_vulpine 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| unfortunately ethernet capable hdmi exists |
|
| ▲ | pier25 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > disconnect the wireless radio from the main board Why? |
| |
| ▲ | arcanemachiner 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So your idiot brother doesn't connect your spy TV to the WiFi when he comes to visit, instead of using the goddamn Chromecast that is already plugged into it. >:( | | |
| ▲ | sparky_z 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Dogsitter in my case. | |
| ▲ | encrypted_bird 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This seems very specific.............you wanna talk about it? /hug-offer | |
| ▲ | mmooss an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Happened to elderly relatives. I had it set up so nicely and someone 'helped', and then it seems rude to disconnect what they did. | |
| ▲ | dreamcompiler an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This. I've had this happen with relatives who come to visit. It's unkind to tell them "Don't fuck with the TV" or "Ignore the TV if it tells you it wants to connect to something." They want to be "helpful" and show me they can "work tech" by doing stuff like this. They don't understand that the TV is manipulating them. I don't want to have to explain to them that I'm basically a neurosurgeon and they just tried to impress me by drilling a hole in somebody's head. Because the TV told them to. Disconnecting the wifi avoids the need for unpleasant conversations. | |
| ▲ | Tyr42 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yours too? Dang. |
| |
| ▲ | sudonem 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Even if you never connect the TV to your WiFi network it will constantly scan for public networks and also scan for any devices that will respond. “Off” doesn’t actually mean off anymore. :( | | |
| ▲ | duskwuff 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Do you have any specific examples of devices where this has been implemented? Because I've heard this idea thrown around a lot as a hypothetical, but never any concrete evidence that it's been done. | | | |
| ▲ | kazinator 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why would I care that some device to which I never gave a shred of my personal information of any kind (e.g. not logging it into any online account) found an open public network that I don't use and that has no connection to me? Sure, I would be disturbed that it's doing that sort of thing in spite of Wi-Fi being explicitly turned off. What is the threat to me though? | | |
| ▲ | __MatrixMan__ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Because it's acting with your IP address, so attempts to prevent whatever shady botnet things it gets up to may also interfere with legitimate use by humans on your network. | |
| ▲ | mmooss an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They have your location, and can detect your interests from what you watch, and fingerprint you. Things like this are pieces of a larger, comprehensive picture of your life. Also, how do you pay for streaming channels, etc., if you don't give it any information? | |
| ▲ | kortilla an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Samsung TVs were literally recording people with microphones and doing voice recognition. Unless you don’t speak in your home, it will have you identified quite quickly. | |
| ▲ | x3n0ph3n3 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It can record audio, sometimes video, and fingerprint what you watch on it. Proximity can be enough to identify you. | |
| ▲ | aftbit 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | ACR | |
| ▲ | lowbloodsugar 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because the TV is recording your voice, what you watch and possibly taking pictures, depending on the brand, and it needs a connection to send that information to whoever will pay for it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | MiscCompFacts 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’ve heard the TV’s will try to connect to any passwordless, public access point it can reach even without your approval. | | |
| ▲ | duskwuff 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | While I've certainly heard plenty of theorizing about the possibility of this happening, I have yet to see any conclusive evidence that it has ever been done. EDIT: What I am referring to here is the specific allegation that smart TVs will connect to open wireless networks without being commanded to do so. It's not a catch-all for any nefarious thing involving TVs or wireless networks. | | |
| ▲ | Larrikin 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's been confirmed in the recent LG scandal. | | |
| ▲ | gnabgib 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The denied ones that have yet to be proven? LG denies TV spying claims, says tracking and snooping concerns 'not true' (635 points, 2 months ago, 494 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49645480 | | |
| ▲ | duskwuff 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And that isn't even the same thing either! (This seems to be a recurring theme.) If it were true that LG TVs "spy" on ambient audio, that would certainly be bad, but it wouldn't also establish that the TVs were connecting to open wireless networks to exfiltrate that data. |
| |
| ▲ | LoganDark 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | LG scans the list of nearby networks. It does not automatically connect to any. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Geezus_42 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How many open WiFi networks are there within range of your TV? | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Comcast runs a separate "Xfinity WiFi" on all their routers, any Comcast user can connect to it with their credentials. Would they strike a deal with TV manufacturers to let them use it? It would not surprise me. | | |
| ▲ | abeyer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Pretty sure this is a known offering from Comcast, you just have to talk to the right sales rep... I haven't yet seen any evidence of a TV using it (yet), but hve been told they will sell a company IoT or fleet device access to their wifi endpoints for enough money. I'm not sure it would be cost effective for mass market device surveillance, though. Also Amazon does this same model with their Sidewalk service, which can run over bluetooth or lora, instead of wifi... and is specifically priced to be usable for large numbers of devices. | |
| ▲ | bethekidyouwant 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It would however surprise many. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | OtomotO 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I guess for people living in cities where different neighbours move in and out and have open WiFis. If the devices still scan all the time... Living on the countryside there is no such problem. | | |
| ▲ | Geezus_42 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Even ISP routers come with a default password now. I can't remember the last time I found an actual open WiFi. | | |
| ▲ | olyjohn 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | All the TV manufacturers have to do is make a deal with Xfinity to jump on their AP, and you're toast. I don't know why anybody would defend them or give them any bit of slack on this. Once they figure this out, they will do it. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | sublinear 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Use a box of your choice on the other end of the HDMI cables. This is now the box that you trust. (Roku? Shield? Blu-ray? MacBook? PC? Linux? Playstation? XBox? Whatever you want.) If they choose a Firestick or Roku what's the difference? XD |