If OpenAI really banned him for that reason, that would be pretty stupid. If you can no longer use an LLM for reverse engineering without worrying about your account, that drastically reduces its value.

▲

spockz 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In my efforts to reverse engineer the LG firmware to validate Gamers Nexus claims, I got a warning very quickly. I appealed that quickly and successfully.

Then I applied for daybreak blue and haven’t had any issues since.

It also a matter of phrasing. Say what you want to achieve not how if it is approaching defensive or cyber stuff.

Also state you are working on your own devices and software. (If that is the case of course.)

▲

papascrubs 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Was this through a personal subscription? Last I looked into daybreak access, if required an organization based account.

	▲	spockz an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yes a personal subscription. Individuals can also request it. only blue for defensive questions. Red for offensive is gated to organisations that are proven to be using it for protecting. https://chatgpt.com/cyber

▲

williamdclt an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> If you can no longer use an LLM for reverse engineering without worrying about your account, that drastically reduces its value

...for a niche of customers, from whom the revenue is probably entirely negligible to OpenAI.

Not saying it's right, ethical or anything like that, but it's not "stupid"

	▲	notrealyme123 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It creates a lot of uncertainty. Especially if you depend more and more on them in your day to day life. If your always-on agent hears to wrong thing, you could lose access to things you depend on. The same reason makes GCP very unattractive.

▲

dmantis an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]