Whenever people talk about why you should host in the EU, this is just the most recent example for why should shouldn't.

▲

privacyishuman 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Also, hosting location is kind of a deception for real ways to protect data, like E2EE, which work no matter the country.

▲

nairboon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Host in Switzerland, that's where Quad9 operates from.

▲

drnick1 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Switzerland is not in the EU, thankfully. And it seems to be one of the few places left in Europe where privacy is taken somewhat seriously.

	▲	bwoodcock 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Indeed. If it were just a question of Swiss law, we'd be in excellent shape. The problem is that France and Switzerland are both signatories to the Lugano Convention, while the US is not. As long as the Quad9 Foundation has to have a legal domicile somewhere, there will always be some lever that can be used against it. Switzerland was the best place, but does not offer perfect protection.

▲

sltkr 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Switzerland has its own DNS blocklist that all ISPs obey. [1]

Quad9 doesn't obey it but I never understood how they can get away with that legally. I'd be interested in an explanation if someone knows more!

1. https://www.gespa.ch/en/fighting-illegal-gambling/access-blo...

▲

johnhtodd 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Quad9 is not a telecommunications service provider as defined by Swiss law, which is where that application becomes enforced. Details of this (and many other things) can be found on the "Compliance and Applicable Law" section of the website. https://quad9.net/privacy/compliance-and-applicable-law/

▲

leni536 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I opened the blocklist expecting some juicy Linux ISO sites and... it's all betting sites. I'm not even mad.

	▲	sltkr 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm a little mad because it's the principle of the thing. In practice the only site I occasionally want to check that's blocked is Polymarket. I don't trade on there myself, but I find it useful to check the odds of certain events.

▲

einsteinx2 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sounds like they get away with it legally because the law applies to ISPs and they’re not an ISP.

From your link:

> Internet service providers in Switzerland are obliged to take measures to prevent access to these domains (DNS blocking).

	▲	sltkr 23 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I suppose that's it. It still feels a little strange that that loophole is allowed: everyone who has a Swiss ISP could switch to Quad9 and be strictly better off. But if everyone does that, then the DNS ban is completely ineffectual. Maybe I should let sleeping dogs lie.