Go rewatch the rally, there are plentiful anti-democratic statements.

Then watch the riot and explain to us how more than 100 officers were injured and why the people who did that deserved pardons, please, I am curious for the current justifications on the hard right

▲

CodeWriter23 a day ago | parent [-]

Same question to you, are you implying collective punishment applies to Trump because of what some who claimed to be his supporters at the time said?

▲

verdverm 21 hours ago | parent [-]

interesting justifications or absolvement... is this a reframing of the planted FBI conspiracy theory?

Are you saying those people who Trump pardoned, he did not call "his people" or "true patriots"? Are you objecting to the video evidence of the crimes committed by those same people on an individual basis?

Have you looked at any of these cases yourself (done your own research)?

Are you open to considering that anti-democratic statements were made by the people on stage at the rally?

	▲	CodeWriter23 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		You raised the issue of J6 and implied Trump's culpability for the actions of others. If you have proof he committed a criminal act, bring it. I am simply saying you did not present any in your prior statement. A lot of illegal things happened that day. The rule of law applies. A lot of people are still in jail related to their activities on J6, patriots and otherwise. Since I can predict what your next point will be: The intended scope of the J6 pardons was to be those wrongly prosecuted under the Biden DoJ's on-the-fly rewrite of 18 USC 1512 (which SCOTUS agreed was an improper interpretation) or those denied habeas corpus. Some mistakes were made and there's a handful of people that received pardons when they should still be in jail. That is not ok.