| ▲ | stale2002 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> that clearly shows Its called mutually assured destruction bro. Every country in the world would use their nukes if they were actually under threat of destruction. Thats the point of having nukes. For them to be used as a deterent against collapse. > All the more reason to check They have the nukes already dude! They aren't going away. They aren't going to be destroyed. And the nukes don't disappear just because funding stops going to them. The point being, the destruction of Israel would just result in all of their enemies being destroyed along with them, so you better hope it doesn't happen. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hardbass 4 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Israel doesn't need to be destroyed. The best time to solve the Israeli problem was of course during 1947. Its unfortunate that Britain got so weak at that point, ideally they should have instituted a militant zero tolerance marshal law there and shot on sight any Israeli or Arab terrorist. Israel can still be peacefully south africaed. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||