| ▲ | TazeTSchnitzel 7 hours ago |
| Could HN start feeding submissions through Pangram so us human readers don't have to suffer with reading the nauseating AI-prose? |
|
| ▲ | swiftcoder 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Count yourself lucky - compared to Claude's prose, this is fairly readable. |
|
| ▲ | jadamson 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It reads fine to me. If it is AI, I'd like to know which one so I can use it too. |
| |
| ▲ | stratos123 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It reads okay to me too, yet Pangram says it's mixed - the "What a private key actually is" section is AI, so is 'Why "it cannot be contained"' and some others. | |
| ▲ | TazeTSchnitzel 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think it's a hybrid text. The section about how elliptic curve keys work is particularly aggravating. Unfortunately it's also the only section that gave me new information. | |
| ▲ | karel-3d 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It has parts that are human written and parts that are generated. I couldn't tell at first, but now seeing it in Pangram, it's kind of clear. | | |
| ▲ | Scott_Helme_ 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It was all written by me and then I had final pass/tweak with Claude. | | |
| ▲ | queenkjuul 11 minutes ago | parent [-] | | So parts were generated... Unless you're saying Claude just went "lgtm, ship it" | | |
| ▲ | Scott_Helme_ 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Fair enough, call it a mix if you like. I'm happy to stand behind every claim in my post, and if something's wrong, tell me and I'll fix it. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | marsven_422 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |
