| ▲ | jadamson 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It reads fine to me. If it is AI, I'd like to know which one so I can use it too. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stratos123 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It reads okay to me too, yet Pangram says it's mixed - the "What a private key actually is" section is AI, so is 'Why "it cannot be contained"' and some others. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TazeTSchnitzel 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think it's a hybrid text. The section about how elliptic curve keys work is particularly aggravating. Unfortunately it's also the only section that gave me new information. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | karel-3d 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It has parts that are human written and parts that are generated. I couldn't tell at first, but now seeing it in Pangram, it's kind of clear. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||