Remix.run Logo
▲ hagbard_c 19 hours ago

Why were they banned? They're used in the Netherlands which is rife with small bendy streets so if that was the argument it seems to be somewhat spurious.

▲zarzavat 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They sucked basically. A bendy bus takes up twice as much space as a double decker while being half as fun to ride on. Even with double deckers many bus stops operate beyond capacity with multiple buses in contention at a stop, double deckers allow 3 buses to load simultaneously allowing six busloads of people to board in a space that would only allow for 1 bendy bus, essentially tripling the capacity.

They also cause problems for other road users such as cyclists.

Bendy buses work well if your city has wide straight roads. London's roads are neither.

▲ajuc 13 hours ago | parent [-]

On the other hand if you have trolleybuses (like in my city) the double-deckers are a problem and articulated buses aren't.

▲zabzonk 12 hours ago | parent [-]

in the 1960s, the UK had lots of double-deck trolley buses with few problems - I used to ride them to school.

▲ajuc 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Aren't the hanging lines a problem with double-deckers?

▲gavinsyancey 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Not if you plan for double-deckers and put the lines higher up. And then single-deckers need a longer pickup pole.

▲tonyedgecombe 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There were some fatalities that got a lot of attention in the media. There was also a problem with fare evasion. Some were catching fire as well. A perfect storm of issues.

▲skrtskrt 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The British press really never misses a chance to do the wrong thing huh.

▲globular-toast 9 hours ago | parent [-]

In this case it was the right thing. Double deckers are better.

I didn't know until now that they're only common in Britain. I guess when travelling you don't notice things like "there aren't many double decker buses".

▲ 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲contingencies 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Also don't forget changing anything is a great opportunity for grift and politicking. Test. Evaluate. Plan. Consult. Pilot. Source. Phase out. Phase in. Maintain. A lot of public money to distribute! A lot of project credit-taking and future-progress-aligning to be image-jacked!

▲sagarm 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So we should never change anything?

▲Symbiote 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The right-wing media at the time latched onto them as the cause of all of society's problems, and Boris Johnson promised to get rid of them if he was elected mayor.

In addition to the other reply's issues, they replaced the dirty and stinking but British-made old Routemaster buses, they were much more accessible to the disabled and babies (pushchairs), they were used successfully elsewhere in Europe, and they use more road space which could otherwise contain an important person's car.

I think they're still used in cities outside London, but that's OK since Daily Telegraph journalists never go there.

▲secretsatan 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Any public transport initiative that in any way inconveniences a car driver gets hate in the UK