Is there a link I'm missing to the tool this article is discussing?

arjie a day ago | parent | next [-]

No. There is no link. But crucially, they have given you modern source-code for the entire thing. You should be able to use an LLM agent to produce a similar tool. And the diversity of such tools may well restore diversity of textual conversation.

▲

jiaaro a day ago | parent [-]

I don't see the source code, where did you find that?

[Edit] Or are you implying that readers should direct an LLM at the entire article and expect an equivalent tool to be produced

	▲	arjie a day ago \| parent [-]
		Haha, yes, the latter. The textual description is the critical source code. Here, it tells you that you: * compare pre-LLM and post-LLM writing using 2023 as your index year * create some 100+ fixed rules rather than a sophisticated model * use a fixed threshold to kill

▲

jakzurr a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I read it as it's an in-house tool used at theconsensus.dev for labeling articles in their feed, because using Pangram on every article would cost too much.

▲

eatonphil a day ago | parent [-]

That's right.

	▲	gfody 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		going with something low-tech and gamable is better imo - pangram would flag the good stuff too and cause collateral damage