No. There is no link. But crucially, they have given you modern source-code for the entire thing. You should be able to use an LLM agent to produce a similar tool. And the diversity of such tools may well restore diversity of textual conversation.

▲

jiaaro a day ago | parent [-]

I don't see the source code, where did you find that?

[Edit] Or are you implying that readers should direct an LLM at the entire article and expect an equivalent tool to be produced

	▲	arjie a day ago \| parent [-]
		Haha, yes, the latter. The textual description is the critical source code. Here, it tells you that you: * compare pre-LLM and post-LLM writing using 2023 as your index year * create some 100+ fixed rules rather than a sophisticated model * use a fixed threshold to kill