I'm wondering - have you asked an LLM to flesh-out the paper for you? Or walk you through the details?

I've been hearing stories of mathematicians who are developing a new found appreciation for LLMs by having them explain the other LLM's paper. I guess the paper has the necessary details but possibly not the best exposition.

EDIT:

Here's a link explaining this paper:

https://claude.ai/share/81b1380d-ca03-4ecb-8475-8e0bb95ea87e

▲

philipwhiuk a day ago | parent [-]

No I haven't. Because the purpose of a paper is communicating the development in the field. If they aren't doing it, they're bad papers.

How do I know when I read Claude's interpretation of the paper that it's not hallucinating.

	▲	qarl a day ago \| parent [-]
		Papers are written for experts, not the public. And nowadays LLMs are the experts. So. It will explain it to you if you ask. And it does a very nice job. You'll probably need to lose the attitude, tho.