No I haven't. Because the purpose of a paper is communicating the development in the field. If they aren't doing it, they're bad papers.

How do I know when I read Claude's interpretation of the paper that it's not hallucinating.

Papers are written for experts, not the public.

And nowadays LLMs are the experts. So. It will explain it to you if you ask. And it does a very nice job. You'll probably need to lose the attitude, tho.