| ▲ | Brendinooo 8 hours ago |
| Props to Apple for making this. Always cool to see them try stuff. That said: I watched their video demo with the family getting ready in the morning: there are some interesting ideas here but imo if this doesn't get reasonably full access to the App Store then it's a no-go for me. Like: FaceTime while cooking, sure, but those calls tend to happen on Messenger and Snapchat for us. Music in the kitchen, sure, but I run Plexamp. My kids are always stealing my iPad to run the Toybox 3D printer; this would be a great thing for them to use. And so on. My house has a bunch of spots on the wall where an old intercom system used to live: it'd obviously be a budget buster to buy a bunch of these to fit in those slots but even if you did, you'd need Apple to provide an intercom solution (a la the Watch's Walkie-Talkie?) or you're...out of luck. |
|
| ▲ | danudey 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > this doesn't get reasonably full access to the App Store then it's a no-go for me From their page: "Additional apps. HomeView supports compatible third-party audio and video apps from your iPhone for a familiar experience across devices" This implies that Plexamp could be supported, and possibly Messenger and Snapchat calls, but it's too early to tell. > My house has a bunch of spots on the wall where an old intercom system used to live: it'd obviously be a budget buster to buy a bunch of these to fit in those slots but even if you did, you'd need Apple to provide an intercom solution (a la the Watch's Walkie-Talkie?) or you're...out of luck. Apple Home already provides this. It's not a full voice chat, but you can tap a thing and say something and it'll broadcast it to the rest of the house; in my case, that's two HomePods Mini, but it's easy to assume it will include this as well. If you're just looking to say "Hey kids, dinner's ready" or "We have to leave in 15 minutes" to the entire house then that circumstance is handled already; if you want to have a back-and-forth conversation with someone in another room, though, it doesn't do that (yet?). |
| |
| ▲ | flanz_10 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It sounds like it'll be integrating with the call and widget apis. Right now, you can redirect any voice call that uses the system call UI to your homepod. Adding video, maybe? |
|
|
| ▲ | gyomu 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I suspect this might be the beginning of a new turn for Apple strategy under Ternus: more satellite hardware that’s cheap(ish) compared to the flagship devices & locked down, reliant on your iPhone to do anything useful, pushing you to use exclusively Apple services rather than 3rd party ones. The App Store
strategy is a thing of the past. |
| |
| ▲ | fcarraldo 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Wouldn't this have been in-development for quite some time under Cook? | | |
| ▲ | mastax 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ternus was the Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering and by reports was leading the charge on this stuff. |
| |
| ▲ | Brendinooo 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, this is interesting to think about. Maybe it's a bet on LLMs/Siri AI as well: all of the not-iPhone devices become more useful if you can control them well with your voice. I think people do feel some tension about staring at their phones all day and like the idea that the phone can stay in the pocket or on a desk while stuff like the Watch and maybe a HomeView or a HomePod could cover a lot of the little usages along the way. (I'm not sure people would ACTUALLY use them that way, but I could see it driving some sales.) | | |
| ▲ | msdz 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > people do feel some tension about staring at their phones all day That, plus the crowd who would want or like
to hack on a device like this, or at least use a non-Apple app or service, is probably far outnumbered by people who don’t care what (and whose) software can run on their screen in the home as long as it looks nice and works well, which is typically the case for Apple. | |
| ▲ | joshstrange 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > some tension about staring at their phones all day They talk about it more but very few (low enough to not effectively not matter) actually do anything about it. If you want to spend less time on your phone you can... just do it. Setup screen time and practice an ounce of self-discipline. It's the same as when people say "People hate their phones so that's why we created <AI Pendant>", uh people _love_ their phones, some to an unhealthy degree but I've never bought into the idea that people are actually pinning for a way to use their phones less. That's why it's going to be a massive uphill battle for OpenAI to break into the hardware space IMHO. Apple wasn't wrong in their Keynote about how the perfect "AI" device is already in your pocket. Now, it's more limited than it should be due to the locked down nature of Apple's phones but if you could build anything without restriction on the iPhone platform then yes, it would be a great AI platform. |
| |
| ▲ | joshstrange 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Rumor has it that this product has been kicking around internally for 1-2 years waiting on a better Siri to pair with it. Meaning it would have been released under Cook if not for the disastrous showing of Siri and all things AI from Apple. I really hope this is just something that was all packaged up to release and didn't make sense to kill it. I mean, I still think they picked wrong and they should have shelved it and the LG device integrations. I really hope it's not a sign of what's to come with Ternus. | |
| ▲ | pkulak 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's the big agent play for everyone. What good is this thing unless your whole family has an iphone, you use iCloud for email/calendar/contacts, you have HomeKit running your house, AppleTV, etc? Failing that, it's a big, voice-activated kitchen timer; just like everything else. | |
| ▲ | HumblyTossed 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He's been CEO for a week. Product development timelines are longer than that. | |
| ▲ | EDC9599190 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I could see that. Apple wants to design the best UI for everything and be the front-end to everything their users interact with. Home automation is a good place to gain market share among their upper income clientele. | |
| ▲ | criddell 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Surely this device has to be mostly a Cook project, no? | | |
| ▲ | Lalabadie 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ternus being named CEO is a long-term project that certainly includes him and Tim Cook. I don't think it's a surprise to anyone internally that there are several big releases after his nomination. |
| |
| ▲ | throw4356h3w 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Reminds me of what Xiaomi does. They have an assortment of Home products that all tie in together with their ecosystem/apps. I use an iPhone, but I have a lamp, a shaver, and sunglasses from Xiaomi. |
|
|
| ▲ | notfried 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It makes sense they'd eventually do that. The Apple TV didn't launch with an App Store, and it took 8 years after its first generation to get an App Store! I'd guess Apple sees that most apps wouldn't make sense for the HomeView, and they'll likely restrict what categories of apps can launch on it. |
| |
| ▲ | dewey 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Also all the developers are angry and trying to build for Duo right now that didn’t even give them a simulator in time, so makes sense to not rush this out right away. | | |
| ▲ | jimbokun an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | They’ll get over it if the Duo sells well. | |
| ▲ | WorldMaker 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | For what it is worth, this seems to have a similar screen form factor to the expanded to Duo, so maybe they were waiting for this announcement before revealing the simulator to make it clearer that apps supporting one of the devices may support both? Not the first time Apple has made multi-device plays on a new form factor. | | |
| ▲ | Kwpolska 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The HomeView has a 1:1 display, the Duo has 1:1.4 displays. Not really similar. Although I would expect any devs (had there been a SDK) to start with their iPad apps, which are expected to adapt to different window sizes. |
|
| |
| ▲ | MichaelZuo 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah the lack of an app store is fine for the first year. But the requirement for everyone to have an ipad or iphone on 27.2 or later (for full functionality) seems more of a showstopper. I would have been in the market for one but haven’t even bothered to upgrade past iOS 18 yet. | | |
| ▲ | HumblyTossed 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > But the requirement for everyone to have an ipad or iphone on 27.2 or later (for full functionality) seems more of a showstopper. I would have been in the market for one but haven’t even bothered to upgrade past iOS 18 yet. This is what irritates me about Parental Controls in 27. Everyone has to be on 27 or nobody gets the new controls. So, we still have a mini 5 that we let the littlest one on. It works, there's not reason to get a new one, but sure would be nice to have the newer Parental Controls for the older kids. | |
| ▲ | azinman2 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 27 is really good. Worth the upgrade. Disclosure: I work at Apple. But that’s also my honest opinion. | | |
| ▲ | yreg 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | One issue with upgrading: macOS 27 doesn't run Xcode 26 which most developers probably want to continue using until they finish polishing the apps for Duo. | |
| ▲ | HumblyTossed 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You're right, it is. But there's some annoying caveats. Parental Controls - every device has to be on 27 or nobody gets the updates. Have an iPad mini 5 that we let the youngest use, so that messes with everything. |
| |
| ▲ | wat10000 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I doubt that people who are still running an OS version from two years ago are a significant potential market for this. | | |
| ▲ | swiftcoder 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > still running an OS version from two years ago Part of Apple's whole appeal is that you get OS patches for a really long time. Outside of tech enthusiast circles, it's not that common to YOLO into bleeding-edge OS updates | | |
| ▲ | wat10000 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's hardly "YOLO into bleeding-edge OS updates" to run something more recent than a 2024 major release. Anyway, I'm not criticizing. Run what you like! I just don't expect the overlap between "buys Apple device in entirely new category" and "running OS version from two years ago" to be very large. | | |
| ▲ | Kwpolska 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | | iOS 27 came out a month ago, and 27.2 is currently in beta, so buying this device does require being on the bleeding edge. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | vscarpenter 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think the Watch is a better precedent than the Apple TV. The product page already borrows its vocabulary: customizable faces, Live Activities, and “compatible third-party audio and video apps from your iPhone.” That’s how WatchKit started in 2015. Third-party Watch apps ran as extensions on the paired iPhone, went native with watchOS 2 later that year, and didn’t get an on-device App Store until watchOS 6 in 2019. So I wouldn’t expect a HomeView App Store soon. I’d expect iPhone-hosted extensions first (widgets, Live Activities, CarPlay-style templates for audio and video), probably at WWDC. That also spares developers who are already scrambling to support the Duo. |
|
|
| ▲ | atourgates 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My life is basically the family in this ad, and I just have a hard time imagining how one of these would make anything better. Everyone in our family who sould have access to calendars/facetime/messages/etc. already does. It's overkill for just a smart speaker. I guess maybe the kids who are too young to have their own device could more easily call their grandparents? Cool hardware and a surprisingly affordable price, I just don't have a use case for it. EDIT: The wall mounted version seems like a better form-factor though. Doesn't take up counter/table space at least. |
| |
| ▲ | rickyc091 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, the grandparents scenario was exactly why I immediately bought it. Younger kids with limited screen time. The grandparents call our phones to talk to them and vice versa. I'm curious how this will work for my kids who don't have apple devices/accounts. We're old school and use a dry erase board on the fridge for our calendar, so a centralized device would be nice. We tried using an old iPad, but it was more clunky to turn it on, click on the app each time. We did try kiosk mode, but it was terrible when we needed the device for something else. | |
| ▲ | saaaaaam 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For families who want to reduce screen time and device reliance this could be a very good alternative to everyone having their own device. | | |
| ▲ | ethbr1 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Like some sort of shared communication device that's larger, sits on a counter, and is plugged into the wall? What a novel idea. | | |
| ▲ | saaaaaam 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Fax machine? Genuinely not sure what you mean. Is the answer just "a computer" ? Because while yes, that's true, this apparently recognises the different users. So presumably if a child is using it, that will be under managed parameters set by a parent - meaning that it's much harder for the child to circumvent. | | |
| |
| ▲ | chasebank 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | wait until someone designs an old school wireless home phone to connect to it. we'll come full circle. | | |
| |
| ▲ | redanddead 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >home, always on recording It’s not surprising they made it cheap They’re trying to compete with all the other creepy Flock-at-Home brands Its only purpose is to disrupt competitors | | |
| ▲ | Brendinooo 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Apple has a better track record in this regard, do you have any recent evidence that this trust is unfounded? | |
| ▲ | fhn 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | always on recording means you are the product and they can train off of you and be even more embedded in your life. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | swiftcoder 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > if this doesn't get reasonably full access to the App Store then it's a no-go for me This was one of the stumbling blocks that really put the final nail in Meta's Portal. You could call your friends on messenger or WhatsApp, but no 3rd party story for FaceTime, Zoom, Google... was a real problem for most folks |
| |
| ▲ | popupeyecare 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I believe it supports carplay compatible apps. According to Wired, “a handful of third-party media apps like Spotify are available, and developers can bring over existing CarPlay apps.” |
|
|
| ▲ | isodev 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Same, all of the apps they demo in the video are not useful in my family - we use a different messenger, different calendar, different video calling app... it's not just about the App Store, if it's supposed to integrate with house things (there was the doorbell camera in the video) it needs to work with "homes" from other vendors, not just HomeKit. Also, I believe that form factor was tried by both Meta and Google and didn't really click with people - who has so much free space near a power socket... in the kitchen ... in the morning ... lol. |
| |
| ▲ | joezydeco 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The intro video does an excellent job of hiding the fact that this needs a power cord. There's one quick shot shows a hole drilled into the middle of the kitchen island to provide access to the USB-C cord. | | |
| ▲ | al_borland 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was looking for the power cord as well, and required actually looking for it. I’m curious about the wall mounted option, and how that gets power without an electrician running a line to the middle of the wall. It looked like there might be a PoE option, but that also needs cable run. It seems like a bit of a project. | | |
| ▲ | xattt 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It looked like there might be a PoE option, but that also needs cable run “Power Mount PoE Wired” is an option that will be available in early 2027. I can already see this being a decent option for kitchens that had a wall phone plate (that, hopefully, was wired with Cat 5e…). Paired with some yet-to-be-released homeOS VoIP app… chefs kiss. | | | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’m curious about the wall mounted option, and how that gets power without an electrician running a line to the middle of the wall. People wall-mount flat screen TVs without an electrician all the time, and it's no big deal. Because of its size, this should be even simpler. | | |
| ▲ | isodev 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | That only works if you live in a paper house. Drilling through normal brick/concrete walls is not that easy - we do call someone when we need our wall mounted TV setup. | | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I doubt you live in a house where every single wall is brick or concrete. Unless you live in a nuclear bunker. I live in a concrete building, and only the exterior walls and one or two interior walls are concrete. The rest is normal walls that for some reason you refer to as "paper." I guess they don't have lumber in your country. You're just inventing problems where none exist. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | Cyph0n 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Give us a Home Assistant integration and watch these sell like hotcakes :) | | |
| ▲ | a10c 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yep. I'd pre-order 3 today if i could get it with first class HomeAssistant app support. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | tyre 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Homepods have intercom support. What's also crazy is that they can detect fire alarms, will alert your iPhone, and then can pipe both sound and voice to the HomePod. It announces that it's going to do so, so it's not a privacy nightmare. Pretty cool. I didn't know it existed until it happened. (Thankfully nothing bad.) |
|
| ▲ | Gareth321 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I strongly agree. Lack of support for Plexamp is a dealbreaker for me. At minimum they're going to need to support Spotify or they'll kill the product. I think it will probably need YouTube support as well. There is a worryingly sparse amount of information published about what it will support. |
| |
| ▲ | rconti 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yep. I'm afraid they're going to "require" that you use Apple Music and HomePods to be useful. I'm pretty interested in trying the product, but that depends on Sonos and Spotify support at minimum. | |
| ▲ | 10729287 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well, plexamp is a dealbreaker for Apple that more and more wants you to buy Apple Music and all their services. They have more to lose by opening to plexamp users, who are not the more prone to spend money, or other services, than to lock users in their very own walled garden. Open source software on consumer friendly hardware is the way now. | | |
| ▲ | Brendinooo 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't know if that's obviously true. I'm sure Plexamp is small potatoes compared to how many are on Apple Music, and there's a solid chance that anyone running a Plex server is doing it on a Mac. |
| |
| ▲ | al_borland 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Does it lack support? It says it supports various apps from the App Store or phone, so it might work. I was surprised when I tried using Plexamp with Siri in my car and it worked (this was with the old Siri, not even the new one). | | |
| ▲ | Brendinooo 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | On the specs page it says: Apps Available from iPhone: - Audiobooks - Classical Music - News - TV Underneath that it says "Supported third-party audio and video apps". I'm not sure what that means. But yeah! Plexamp works fine with Siri on my phone. | | |
| ▲ | FireBeyond 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | There was something that implied that it was using CarPlay somewhere in the stack. |
|
| |
| ▲ | phoghed 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | obviously supporting more platforms would be better, but they do have >100 million Apple Music subscribers according to this estimate: https://musically.com/2026/06/17/music-business-ended-2025-w... |
|
|
| ▲ | tokioyoyo 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There’s a potential argument that’s brewing how software moat is null, distribution is still hard-to-impossible to crack. A company, could, spin up software very easily by monitoring the requests of the existing clients that have purchased the hardware. Having such teams that push out software would be valuable, as you’d get a complete walled garden experience. Would be hard to pull off though, as your marketing team needs to be insanely good at convincing people that the product itself is valuable. |
|
| ▲ | cube00 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Music in the kitchen, sure, but I run Plexamp. As much as I like Apple hardware I know unless I'm willing to go full Apple on hardware and services (eg. Apple Music in this example) I'm always going to have a mid experience trying to be on the fence of their walled garden. |
|
| ▲ | uptown 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Apple Home already has a Walkie-Talkie feature. |
| |
| ▲ | Brendinooo 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Huh, interesting! I opened up my Home app and didn't see anything obvious. I'll have to look into what I need to use it... | | |
| ▲ | blokey 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Press the wavy-lined icon on the left at the top right cluster of three icons.
Or ask Siri to "Intercom <stuff>" and it'll pipe it out the speakers (and peoples phones if they set that enabled!) | | |
| ▲ | WorldMaker 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Walkie Talkie has a dedicated "app" icon on WatchOS and I wonder how much more it would be used by people if iOS and iPadOS offered a more obvious link pinnable to the Home Screen like WatchOS. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | fhn 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "My kids are always stealing my iPad to run the Toybox 3D printer; this would be a great thing for them to use." Is it? Why not get them a iPad instead? |
| |
| ▲ | Brendinooo 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | iPads cost more, and it really doesn't get much use in our house otherwise. | | |
| ▲ | tyre 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do very old (like 5+ years old) iPads cost more than $300? Seems like you wouldn't need constant OS updates for their use case but idk. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | tyromaniac 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > former intercom Do you live in a former schoolhouse, or Uma Thurman's place from pulp fiction? |
| |
| ▲ | gnarlouse 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | intercom systems were pretty ubiquitous in the 90's and 00's... | | |
| ▲ | 0x457 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | House I used to rent had intercom in every room and CD player that plays in whole house via those intercomes. It didn't work, but i but in early 00s that was major reason to brag. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mmmlinux 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| they already provide intercom with the homepods, its not great, but it exists. |
|
| ▲ | yohannparis 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| home.app already has an intercom feature that can play to all devices in the home. |
| |
| ▲ | phoghed 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | And indeed on the first set of images of the device there is an intercom tile. |
|