| ▲ | US proposes $100k charge for international students to do post-graduate work(nature.com) |
| 56 points by bluenose69 2 hours ago | 54 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | yummypaint an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| When we hit the academic brain drain tipping point in the US, talent isn't going to just start trickling away, it's going to be like a greedy cup siphon. Countries preparing to attract these people now will reap a windfall the US has carefully cultivated over a century. This administration has demonstrated the federal government cannot be trusted to keep it's commitments and long-term plans, and it will now take a generation of stability to disabuse people of that notion. |
| |
| ▲ | hn_submit 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | IMHO it would be better to limit their stay to 4 years after which they need to exit the country for 3 months to prevent them applying for citizenship. After those three months they can apply for an extension for another 4 years. | | |
| ▲ | tristancao 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | F-1 visas are categorized as non-immigrant visas. No amount of years in the U.S. would make them eligible for citizenship. |
| |
| ▲ | rayiner 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This rhetoric is insulting to Americans. We're not talking about something "carefully cultivated over a century." U.S. didn't have OPT until 1992! The foreign-born population in the U.S. was around 5% when tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, HP, and Intel were founded. And most of the immigration to the U.S. up to that point was low-skill immigration, with ad-hoc measures to take skilled immigrants here and there. That approach worked fine to develop the U.S. into a leading technological power. | |
| ▲ | sandworm101 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Blaming the government is a cop out. The american government is an expression of the will of the american people. For all the screaming, a politicaly significant percentage of the population supports every decision being made by this administration. There is an election comming up. I want to be proven wrong. But i suspect the ussual patterns will emerge and little will change. Too many people are too comfortable with the current situation. | | |
| ▲ | sdcfgy 28 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah. America is a symptom of Americans... | |
| ▲ | ptero 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | While I agree with much of what you wrote the percentage of people supporting every (or even most) decision of this administration is very small. But a large portion of the population doesn't like the alternative any better. They said a few years ago that Trump and Biden have a chance only if they run against each other. So it is more nuanced. We will see what the candidates in 2 years look like. | | |
| ▲ | hn_submit 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The vote is skewed because of the large number of Latinos and East Asians that have flowed into the country over the last three decades. If you tally the vote by ethnicity you'll see there's a large amount of support from the white majority (which is getting smaller every year) for these measures. | | |
| ▲ | ptero 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I do not think you can get the support level for specific measures from a vote. A vote is a single, crude A vs B on a large set of measures. And when a vote is between two options seen as largely abhorrent the winning basket can be a very strange one. My 2c. |
|
| |
| ▲ | wand3r 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is such a crazy statement. Democracy in the US is dead. People are incredibly dumb and I believe you have the causal relationship reversed, even for relatively smart people. The will of the American people is deeply influenced by interested parties dumping money into various areas. Rich elite own almost all media and even "democratized" social media is heavily influenced. You can't even use a search engine these days. Ultimately, the 70% plus "will" of the people is money out of politics, stock bans for elected officials, no foreign wars and universal healthcare. Things both parties unite to curtail | | |
| ▲ | webarchitect 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Democracy isn't dead, but in the US, it's sure in troubled water. The two-party system encouraged people not to think for themselves but instead have to choose between two parties that, at least initially had common ground but now are diametrically opposed to one another. Now one of the two parties is pretty weak, having lost ground, giving the impression that it had lost touch with the common people and focused on loud but semi-fringe issues. One party owning the system has the same look as Democracy is dead. Not to mention that even with a strong leader in both parties, we are on a race to the bottom, each election oscillating between the two parties, each spending lots of money and focus undoing what the other party did. When the two parties had common ground, this was much less of an issue. In the end, this isn't going to get fixed, the US is going to just keep printing money, blowing up the deficit until the last few countries outside the US who trust us no longer do. We'll be in too many wars, in too many places, with too few friends. End up the same way the USSR was when they were in Afghanistan for too long. I don't think even if you pulled money out of politics, banned stock trading for elected officials, no foreign wars, universal health care - that we would right the ship. Our problems are fundamental. Our early leaders warned us against a two-party system, trying to show us the problems it would lead to, and we ignored it. | |
| ▲ | markvdb 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Democracy in the US is dead. People are incredibly dumb[...] So what alternative or incremental improvement to democracy would you propose? And more importantly, how would you like to get there? | |
| ▲ | pirate787 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Democracy is dead" because I disagree with the policy preferences of the majority of voters. | | |
| ▲ | bix6 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | They aren’t wrong about the influence of money though. | |
| ▲ | rzerowan 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | IMHO its mostly been proven that special intrests , corporations hold more influence than the electorate. To that extent that bot wings of the uniparty basically persue the same agenda with very little variation in econ/pol while distarcting everyone with nonstop culture war bs.
Ergo its more feasible to playact at parades thsn it is to have a proper industrial policy for example that would mean hosing Wall Streeet profits to do. so. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Varelion 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | “Now, there's one thing you might have noticed I don't complain about: politicians. Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don't fall out of the sky. They don't pass through a membrane from another reality. They come from American parents and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses and American universities, and they are elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It's what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant leaders. Term limits ain't going to do any good; you're just going to end up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans. So, maybe, maybe, maybe, it's not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here... like, the public. Yeah, the public sucks. There's a nice campaign slogan for somebody: 'The Public Sucks. F*ck Hope.”
― George Carlin | | |
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | And yet they lie and scheme and have propaganda campaigns designed to confuse the ordinary person. Many of whom suck, but others are just e.g. scared old ladies who got told that God hates abortions after decades of their church not seeming to care. |
| |
| ▲ | micromacrofoot 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | The thing about dumb people is that the dumber they are the easier it is to convince them that changing their position is against their interests. This has been something that's been foisted upon the American public through its politics, propaganda, media, and other systems for decades. As a result they have been fleeced through the visage of democracy that has been capped and gerrymandered away from them. We are now in a situation where the entire fate of the country rests on ~250k people who live in some of the poorest, most homogeneous, media-blasted parts of the country. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | TrackerFF 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At least here in Scandinavia, the US is quite popular for the most ambitious and driven students that are interested in entrepreneurship. They apply to top US schools on either coasts via exchange programs, or a full degree, exactly because the schools are so close to the startup scene. Imposing a $100k fee to hire those, would effectively make such types of graduates very unattractive to startups. |
|
| ▲ | gsky 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Every country should block american big tech to create tech jobs for their people. This fixes americas immigration problem too |
| |
| ▲ | petcat 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Nobody will tolerate being forced to use "EU government phone" instead of iPhone or Google Android. They will just revolt against their own government instead. | | |
| ▲ | gsky 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Most Europeans hate american gov and companies so much. They just need a good alternative to jump the ship. | |
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Maybe they'll buy a Chinese one, since their iPhone and many of it's components was already built there. | | |
| ▲ | petcat 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The physical hardware is a nearly irrelevant commodity compared to the software and the ecosystem. |
| |
| ▲ | figmert 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Eh? I'm guessing you've never spoken to a European. Especially since Trump's second term (though not just because of Trump), Europeans generally have a bad view of US tech companies. | | |
| ▲ | petcat 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > never spoken to a European Irrelevant. The EU is not taking American tech, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon away from 330 million Europeans and replacing it with..nothing? without widespread outrage. In a lot of ways it would cause a societal collapse. | |
| ▲ | sajithdilshan 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Maybe that’s true in your close people bubble. Don’t generalise it to every European. I’m pretty sure there a big Trump fans base in Poland, Hungary and Germany to name a few. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | pagutierrezn 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://commission.europa.eu/topics/research-and-innovation/... |
|
| ▲ | rcr-anti an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If memory serves, they've tried this several different ways but keep getting injuncted since it amounts to a tax and not a reasonable processing fee. |
| |
| ▲ | braj0 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Ohh so this is a tax but inflation isn't? I don't ever remember voting for an inflation tax. Our government is so corrupt. | | | |
| ▲ | arenaninja 28 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | My understanding is that since OPT was created via executive magic instead of Congress the department overseeing the program is woefully understaffed and underfunded. Visa work in the US really is at the intersection of DHS, DOL and DOS at the end of the day. It may be that the executive needs to rethink this for better department communication, collaboration and efficiency and investment is genuinely necessary given the scale of these programs compared to their inception. |
|
|
| ▲ | Gigioingiro an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| US keep pursuing this political agenda that goes against the whole foundation of the country rise as world superpower. I wonder how long it needs to last before Europe starts to roll serious academic policy that attracts the orphaned talent refused by US.
The Netherlands started well with the Tulip Fund but a systematic effort is needed. Korea is expanding his VISA grants for AI or tech top talents. Its the first time in decades where top world talent does not point altogether towards US and will be interesting to see which policy from other countries will reveal to be more effective. It's a tight window to take advantage of before the change in US administration so an economical effort in a short time period is required. |
| |
| ▲ | sajithdilshan an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't think this would negatively affect the crème de la crème, they would even have a high demand in US companies especially in STEM fields with higher salaries after finishing the studies. US is popular for higher studies for students all around the world not only because of the opportunities, but also English being the language for studies. I'm not sure how it works in EU countries. Does Netherland or South Korea offers degree programs completely in English? | | |
| ▲ | iamniels an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Netherland Yeah, all higher studies and institutions are in English and you can get around in public with just English. Most expats will rarely hear or need Dutch (The language of The Netherlands). | | |
| ▲ | oersted an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > Most expats will rarely hear or need Dutch That is an overstatement. Dutch is the primary language everywhere like the native language of any country. It is true that in major cities most people speak excellent English and you can definitely manage easily without speaking Dutch. But Dutch is spoken absolutely everywhere and most signage is only in Dutch. Also, as soon as you get a bit outside of the big cities, you find many people with a middling level of English, similar to most other countries in Europe. Even in cities, many working class people and actually most immigrants from non English speaking countries only speak Dutch. | |
| ▲ | manvillej an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Most Dutch will only speak English to non-Dutch. Which is really annoying if you’re there trying to learn Dutch | |
| ▲ | sajithdilshan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How about the language usage at workplace after graduation? Would one have to learn Dutch or still continue everything with English? Also is it easy to get a job after graduation in Netherlands in STEM field? As an example if someone graduated in medicine (doctor, nurse, etc.) then wouldn’t proficiency in Dutch be mandatory to work? | | |
| ▲ | boelboel 27 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It's probably not that big of a problem in the absolute top companies but once you go anywhere else they'll prefer Dutch natives and you'll face hurdles trying to get promotions. This is a big reason why expats end up leaving the country. It also causes resentment from both sides in daily life. |
| |
| ▲ | fifilura an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Same in Sweden, welcome! |
|
| |
| ▲ | dingaling911 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | US rise as a world superpower was luck as opposed to something deliberate, just like most rises are. | | |
| ▲ | causesothere 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Luck? They killed 95% of the existing inhabitants, used a huge agricultural, mining, and forestry base to spread productivity, built national infrastructure with enslaved and indentured labor. They stayed out of two crippling wars as long as they possibly could, and ultimately were the only major power that was able to mostly avoid damage from the war. After which they invited the best scientists from the axis to come build things for them. They then used their position to topple governments around the world for their companies, annex territory (see: Hawaii), and press their interests globally. What about these steps is luck? Evil, sure, but luck? | |
| ▲ | Iolaum an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's not luck it's starting conditions. People have written books about the benefits of geography and natural resources. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 2PqboPPmKegvanx 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| speedrunning brain drain, you spend decades building a moat based on stability and proceed to end decades of work in 24 months. |
|
| ▲ | drivingmenuts 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If the US imposes this charge, they will go somewhere else. Europe, maybe. China, maybe. We won't get the immediate benefit of their work like we do now. This will kill some graduate programs and constrain a lot of others. It is hard to see any positive benefits from this move. If I were China, I'd move on this aggressively. If I were any country with a strong interest in STEM, I'd do the same. In fact, just the mention of this action should spur a somewhat aggressive response. |
| |
| ▲ | 999900000999 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | China has already been aggressively funding Chinese language education in Africa. I suggested to a friend of mine that he consider a CS masters in China. He's semi fluent, but lacks a CS background. I imagine he could figure it out though |
|
|
| ▲ | ChoGGi 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I remember while growing up hearing talk on the news about brain drain. Thanks Trump; next do EV cars worldwide. That felt dirty as a Canadian. I did also wonder what the Riddler had to do with Canadians going to the States... |
|
| ▲ | ubermonkey an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| We are committing suicide as a nation. |
| |
| ▲ | chinathrow 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Look at their handlers. | |
| ▲ | slowmovintarget 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | By setting up a jobs market for foreigners but not for Americans, and by allowing corporations to install immigrant intake machines at the expense of Americans? Yes. That's what needs fixing. I'm in favor of legal immigration. I'm not in favor of H1Bs and the "default" pathway. If we don't get educated and employed as Americans, then yes, we'll be committing suicide. If someone's post-graduate work is that important, and that particular individual is so unbelievably critical to that particular post-doc work, then surely the fee would be worth it. If it's not, then advantaging the market for post-docs in America to actual Americans seems like a good thing, something governments are meant to do for their citizens. Is there a reason the American government shouldn't be allowed to act on behalf of its citizens and must act in favor of everyone else? | | |
| ▲ | thomassmith65 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This comment is an excellent of scarcity mentality* (I can't decide if that's an insult; if it is, I apologize). It's in America's best interest as a nation to have as large a pool of smart students to choose from as possible. The loser nations are the ones whose brightest minds leave (aka: "brain drain") If the people of a nation capable of attracting foreign students are resentful about it, the real problem probably lies elsewhere (eg: inequality, economic depression, or broken media environment) * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarcity_(social_psychology) | |
| ▲ | ModernMech 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Even if we admitted 100% of qualified American citizens who apply, there wouldn’t be enough filled slots to run the programs and do the research. Moreover, educating foreigners in America does benefit Americans: we get the research, schools get their foreign tuition dollars, local landlords and business absorb their cost of living expenses, local governments get tax money from them, they have kids and they become Americans. Or, if they go home they have great stories to share about how amazing America was for them, inspiring a new generation to come here and grow our country. When the American government acts as it does now, all that happens is that economic activity moves somewhere else. There is no void filled by Americans, there’s just a void. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ModernMech 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This government is doing everything they can to make the lives of my students a living hell. First it was the kidnappings and deportations, if that wasn’t enough. Then they defunded their projects, even projects that had already been funded so they destroyed a bunch of in-progress research that can’t be restarted. Then they started fucking with internships, trying to make it so that foreign students can only get an internship if it’s part of the degree program, which most are not. And of course they completely slowed the document processing down to a snail pace so that students can’t even get to campus on time for the start of the semester. Now this. Absolutely insane. America had a higher academic system second to none, people came from around the world to attend our schools, made America better, and brought America back to the places they came from in a positive light. I have one student who fled civil war, he started learning about CS from a country he took refuge in, made his way to America over years, started at a state school and then worked his way up to the graduate level where he busts his ass working in a kitchen every day to be able to afford it. Today he’s publishing papers at top conferences in CS. Every day he is eager to learn and grateful for all opportunities he’s given. And this government wants to chase that kind of student out of the country. Meanwhile my American students show up to class and ask me “is this class hard?” And then they drop it once they find out it takes work, like gasp opening a paper book and reading it faints. It’s going to take decades to repair this damage and I hope all of you here who voted for it (I know there are plenty) understand the damage you caused with your choice. I wish you’ll help fix it because it’s going to take everyone. |
| |
| ▲ | rramadass 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The US is ruining itself by ruining the minds of the current and next generations of students. I finally realized that this is irrecoverable from, when you all laughed and derided Vivek Ramaswamy for saying it as it is. You have simply been enjoying the fruits of labour of your forbears and immigrants and have no plans to sustain it for the future. From Ramaswamy nailed the education challenge - https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/ramaswamy-n... Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long (at least since the 90s and likely longer). That doesn’t start in college, it starts YOUNG. A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers…. This can be our Sputnik moment. We’ve awaken [sic] from slumber before & we can do it again…but only if our culture fully wakes up. A culture that once again prioritizes achievement over normalcy; excellence over mediocrity; nerdiness over conformity; hard work over laziness. Regardless of your political leanings, American culture has been devaluing knowledge, education and everything else to do with them for a while now. |
|