Oh come on, if a company is placing job ads to comply with the letter of this law in 2026 they're 100% exploiting the process Vance outlines and would undoubtedly try to exploit whatever the replacement process was as well.

▲

bialpio an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Nothing prevents the administration from changing the law then, last time I checked their party holds all three branches of government + SCOTUS.

▲

adamrezich an hour ago | parent [-]

Are we referring to the same administration that is met with immediate resistance from an activist judiciary whenever it tries to do literally anything?

▲

thfuran 26 minutes ago | parent [-]

Maybe they should stop trying to do illegal things.

▲

adamrezich 21 minutes ago | parent [-]

Is this thing they're doing illegal?

	▲	bialpio 7 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		No, just selective enforcement and maybe sending a message that if you don't behave, the administration may look a bit harder into you than it normally would.

▲

bathtub365 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Following the published guidelines is not exploiting them. If the government doesn’t like their own guidelines, they should change them.

▲

sjducb an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Agreed, if a company wants to fill roles it advertises on linked in. Maybe the rules need updating.

▲

IAmBroom an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Where "100% exploiting the process" means complying 100% with the standards.

	▲	setr an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Ethereum has “code is law”, but we can still have a notion of the code being exploited, because it is the intent that’s been exploited