Nothing prevents the administration from changing the law then, last time I checked their party holds all three branches of government + SCOTUS.

▲

adamrezich 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Are we referring to the same administration that is met with immediate resistance from an activist judiciary whenever it tries to do literally anything?

▲

jameshart an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Passing a constitutionally valid law through congress and then having the executive branch enforce it would not meet any judicial resistance.

I suspect the courts would welcome it.

▲

thfuran 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe they should stop trying to do illegal things.

▲

jimaway123 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article317504545.html

▲

adamrezich 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is this thing they're doing illegal?

▲

goatlover 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Why would you give this administration the benefit of doubt?

▲

bialpio 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No, just selective enforcement and maybe sending a message that if you don't behave, the administration may look a bit harder into you than it normally would.

	▲	rayiner an hour ago \| parent [-]
		What is the evidence of selective enforcement?