| ▲ | gonzalohm 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
This may be seen as radical. But I think AI tools should be paid by the employee. After all, you should know how to do your work without AI. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kittomic 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Should they pay for their pipelines too? After all, they should know how to compile their software. Any automation of that process is cheating their employer. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wrxd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Sure. Should I also pay rent for my desk at the office? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ungovernableCat 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
You're opening yourself up to data right and privacy risks with that. My company demands that I use their enterprise account because they can claim full ownership of all produced output and have full logs of every interaction. I think that gets legally murky, if the employee is the one who pays for the tool. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | robotburrito 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The forklift should just be paid for by the employee. After all they should be strong enough to do work without one. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Avicebron 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I don't understand your logic, why would an employee pay for a tool their employer wants them to use? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bayindirh 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
If my employer is not forcing me to use a tool and gives me freedom, I'll be perfectly OK to use my own tools which I bought with my own money. If my employer is putting scoreboards to see and champion who uses a tool which costs money to use, they shall pay for the tool. Sorry, I'm not a ladder climber, yet I'm not mindless enough to bankrupt myself. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Jagerbizzle 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I could still do my job by typing all code into notepad, but companies don't charge employees for their IDE usage for a reason. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hypfer 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Nah. Work provides the tools. An LLM is not too dissimilar to a Work Laptop or an IDE license. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | basiliobeltran 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I am fine with that if I can keep the time saved for my personal use. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | iAMkenough 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I’d love it if I could bring my own computer to do my work, rather than be stuck with garbage hardware because of an enterprise agreement. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | watwut 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Employer pays tools used for work. Whether they are used to speed up work or to make it possible. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | platevoltage 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
As someone who does have to pay for my own AI tools (if I didn't use OpenCode's free models), I agree. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | frisbm 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
"employees should foot the bill for tools that directly benefit their billion dollar employers" | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | outside1234 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
In California this would mean the employee would own the IP -- or at least it would be murky -- and companies and lawyers don't like murky. | ||||||||||||||