| ▲ | binaryturtle an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
I don't see any advantage of any of the new formats over the good old and proven formats, so I stick with PNG and JPEG (properly optimized.) I can fire up any old browser and it will just work. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ezfe an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
JXL has clear advantages and saying you don't see them means you either didn't attempt to see them or willfully ignore them | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | VanTheBrand 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
JPEGXL literally is able to display images and colors that jpeg and png cannot (32-but floating point, layers, emission independent transparency, spot colors, built im depth maps). It’s not just about compression optimization. So for those use cases standard JPEG and PNG alone will never work. There are “updated” versions of JPEG that support some of these like HDR but those won’t work with any old browser either so back to the same issue. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | asddubs 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
biggest advantage for me is file size and lossless conversion of existing jpg images. In a network scenario that can meaningfully impact load times. Others will care about e.g. bit depth | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | RobotToaster an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
JXL supports extra channels for multispectral images. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | copperx an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You should add that line to your resume. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||