| ▲ | ezfe an hour ago | |||||||
JXL has clear advantages and saying you don't see them means you either didn't attempt to see them or willfully ignore them | ||||||||
| ▲ | smaudet an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I'm not sure if the parent comment means to say, but I could choose to interpret their meaning to be: PNG/JPEG have strong support (nearly everywhere). I think of them almost as the modern TIFF - relatively simple, and almost everything supports one or both of them (few to no issues). JXL may eventually get there (that indeed seems to be its goal), but for now I wouldn't drop e.g. PNG or JPEG support in favor of JXL now. And arguably, perhaps never drop support; its such a prevalent format, even if all software (prevalent or otherwise) supports the format in 10 years, there will be such a huge stockpile of JPEG/PNG that something will need to be used to read/convert. | ||||||||
| ||||||||