Thanks so much for saying this!

Even with a single instance of Claude Code, running I am producing so much code that it is impossible to even self-review.

Can we please focus on that?

▲

efields 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Self-review is an anti-pattern.

▲

david_p 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Proofreading an essay before submitting it is an anti pattern?

▲

iririririr an hour ago | parent [-]

you don't proof read your speech writer. politicians don't even know what they will read until they start reading in the podium for example. ...not that i think it's good, but people have stopped caring mostly

	▲	lantry 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		And politicians are a famously well-loved group of people

▲

siscia 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just to be clear, when I say that it is impossible even to self review, it was an indication of how difficult is to review code of colleagues.

▲

7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

pipsterwo 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

▲

jasonpeacock 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So much this. We don't review the assembly/machine-code that the compiler creates, why do we still review the code the AI generates?

If it works as desired then ship it; if it doesn't then iterate until it does.

▲

kjs3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If it works as desired then ship it

Before AI, this was a joke.

▲

surgical_fire 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

_because compiling a code language into machine language is deterministic_.

If you think that compiling and explaining in English something to an LLM so it outputs code is the same activity, I just hope to never have you as a coworker.

	▲	LeBit 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Don’t want to be an asshole but the pattern I have observed is that people who were not qualified / competent to code before November of 2022 have this mentality. They want to make you feel dumb and useless with your software development knowledge.

▲

ryandrake 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is only OK where “it works” is the only criteria for accepting a software change.

▲

therein 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because the compiler does a deterministic transform on the input. And the input is less ambiguous than natural language and following more strict rules.

Why ask obvious things?

▲

poolnoodle 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's such an AI bro take

▲

six_seven 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Did you re-read your comment before hitting reply?

▲

mypalmike 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We simply need neural implant technology to overclock our brains, making the world (and its Claude instances) appear to go slower.

	▲	hmokiguess 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You got downvoted but your joke made me think of the show The Dark Matter and how they had the concept of a hallway with infinite doors to represent the multiverse to the human brain that cannot comprehend the state of superposition. I sort of get what you're going for maybe? In a sense these things are gonna evolve at a rate where we are not going to be able to operate at their plane and we will need a sort of UX translation

▲

antoineMoPa 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I built some tools that lets me view diffs and summon agents to execute changes. You can probably vibe code that in a few minutes.