| ▲ | efields 7 hours ago |
| Self-review is an anti-pattern. |
|
| ▲ | david_p 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Proofreading an essay before submitting it is an anti pattern? |
| |
| ▲ | iririririr an hour ago | parent [-] | | you don't proof read your speech writer. politicians don't even know what they will read until they start reading in the podium for example. ...not that i think it's good, but people have stopped caring mostly | | |
|
|
| ▲ | siscia 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Just to be clear, when I say that it is impossible even to self review, it was an indication of how difficult is to review code of colleagues. |
|
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | pipsterwo 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | jasonpeacock 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| So much this. We don't review the assembly/machine-code that the compiler creates, why do we still review the code the AI generates? If it works as desired then ship it; if it doesn't then iterate until it does. |
| |
| ▲ | kjs3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If it works as desired then ship it Before AI, this was a joke. | |
| ▲ | surgical_fire 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | _because compiling a code language into machine language is deterministic_. If you think that compiling and explaining in English something to an LLM so it outputs code is the same activity, I just hope to never have you as a coworker. | | |
| ▲ | LeBit 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Don’t want to be an asshole but the pattern I have observed is that people who were not qualified / competent to code before November of 2022 have this mentality. They want to make you feel dumb and useless with your software development knowledge. |
| |
| ▲ | ryandrake 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is only OK where “it works” is the only criteria for accepting a software change. | |
| ▲ | therein 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because the compiler does a deterministic transform on the input. And the input is less ambiguous than natural language and following more strict rules. Why ask obvious things? | |
| ▲ | poolnoodle 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's such an AI bro take | |
| ▲ | six_seven 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Did you re-read your comment before hitting reply? |
|
