This is what happens when Claude writes it for you (and you don't review it)

So, Claude claims a new discovery and then someone else's Claude writes the blog posts. It would be helpful if I could get Claude to read this for me and post dejected HN comments in response.

	▲	post-it 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You can! And I believe many do. But please don't.

▲

joshuat an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Never thought about how much it must suck to be an engineer named Claude right now

▲

bryanlarsen an hour ago | parent [-]

Not as much as being a woman named Karen.

▲

reilly3000 an hour ago | parent [-]

Or Siri. I knew one who was deeply upset about the whole thing.

▲

ggm 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Siri, Claude and Karen walk into a bar. Nobody serves them because the robots.txt forbade it.

▲

embedding-shape 19 minutes ago | parent [-]

Not gonna lie, sounds like one of those people/things/entities came up with that joke.

	▲	ggm 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		If you think GPT/LLM detection works on one sentence -- then you have found the point. let me re-factor that and here's the thing..

▲

sgarland 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I am deeply upset every time the HomePod in another room decides to attempt to answer my query instead of the phone that’s in my hands, which then has to ask who is speaking, and has a 50:50 chance of ultimately failing to do the task.

With how magical handoff / continuity / whatever it’s called is, it is baffling to me why Apple allows the HomePod to so aggressively take over requests when it sucks so, so much at it.

▲

EA-3167 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not perfect by any means, but Pangram indicates 100% human written. Remember people can be quite foolish without any machine assistance.