30 in a population of 350mill is a ~1:10000000 chance of getting it. 900 or so cases in 3 decades. A cursory google search shows it's killed about 300 people since 1990, so roughly 10 a year, the equivalent of venomous snake-related deaths more or less, and that's because we have quick access to anti-venoms for most of the population otherwise the casualties would be far higher.

Treating that low number like a low number is not "discounting" rural US citizens. The US - all populations included - does not really live with the hantavirus in any real sense. It's incredibly rare. 10x as many people are struck by lightening annually in the US.

▲

mcmcmc an hour ago | parent [-]

It’s a low number because it’s very preventable and people in those areas know to be careful around mouse poop because of the risk of hantavirus

	▲	Forgeties79 43 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Sure. It’s still an incredibly tiny number of people annually, especially considering there is no “direct” treatment or cure for it. It is an incredibly rare disease, so it is hardly something that would qualify as “endemic” to any population in the US. Rural populations in the US do not feel it like rural populations in many other countries. Acknowledging that is not discounting or forgetting rural populations in the US. That is not a fair accusation in the slightest.