Remix.run Logo
▲ jr3592 5 hours ago

Honest question for devs out there... is anyone worried? I don't see enough frank conversation happening around this subject. Timelines. How long until salaries fall? Is it too early to stalk thinking about back up plans? Am I crazy?

▲swader999 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I think technically building this stuff is now easier for the masses. But knowing what to build, how to describe it, how to test it, figuring out how to understand the users -- that's the hard part, always was and I'll be employed doing that for a couple more years at least. But after that, I see this all going towards building for agents, building for users will be a thing of the past. Then I think its not as easy for people to relate to that, probably want a machine designing for other machines. UX and taste don't really matter much at that point.

▲tripleee 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You're not crazy. I think there's still room for the top 5% of devs working on genuinely hard technical problems.. but I don't see a bright future for the rest.

▲weitendorf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There’s going to be a lot of chaos at some point but I think that “hybrid builders” (scientists, sales people, product developers, etc). true specialists, and new opportunities in hw/robotics/training/ will soak up a lot of talent, and be rewarding to work in. Feels very sadly k-shaped.

Software engineering on one end is going to be more like finance or medicine where the cost of poor performance is actually higher than the risk that they wont be worth what you pay them (ie there isn’t any amount of pay where it’s worth it to hire them). Then on the other it’ll be like knowing how to use PowerPoint. All the new tech categories have too many bottlenecks and challenges beyond just producing code to consolidate like that.

▲CuriouslyC 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Salaries won't fall, they'll go up. The number of roles is what'll fall. SWE is going to become a giant game of musical chairs, and people who can't find a seat will get pushed into human facing roles ("product" / "technical sales" / "customer support" ).

▲swader999 28 minutes ago | parent [-]

Naw, I'll just build a competitor to whoever sidelines me next :)

▲ActionHank 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No. Saas hedge is to offer solid api + mcp for agents to use whilst still maintaining their own products alongside. That's it, that's the whole thing.

Are you going to trust a vendor who has been running for years with your business critical operations or brad_69's awesome saas skills and agents? Do you think these businesses are going to shift their whole product to be in Altman's walled garden when they don't need to?

▲aduwah 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In a corporate environment the ability to code does not substitute a decent software engineer.

▲vlucas 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nah. Website builders have been around for a long time in various forms. This isn't much different.

▲bartekrutkowski 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've said it before but I'll repeat it here until someone changes my mind: jobs in IT are safe until using AI gets its equivalent of "no one ever got fired for buying IBM". Until there can be financial and legal responsibility for when things go bad, people are going to be needed. Once it's so good AI labs will be happy to accept liability, it's game over. It was never about code quality.

▲codingdave 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Slapping up a slop website is no threat to professional tech folk.

When they have full DevOps, with multiple environments for testing, compliance with security best practices, can do database updates and data migrations, move the app smoothly between different platforms, streamline costs, and scale to at least hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of users without crashing and burning... then go ahead and worry. We aren't anywhere near that.

On the other hand, if you are purely a coder, and cannot run a project that does all of the above... maybe start your worrying earlier.

▲win311fwg 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> We aren't anywhere near that.

We aren't, but the AI Labs no doubt are. They just can't release it right now because their bread and butter is still developers burning tokens, so there is still a business problem to solve.

▲dyauspitr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Coding is probably solved. Honestly it’s probably going to be 5 years of runtime starting now depending on industry lag and uptake.

A team I was managing spent a whole year converting government forms into a web app. It took a while and there was a lot of discussion with the end users and a bunch of back and forth (keep in mind this is government software with a lot of onerous legal requirements). Then about 4 months ago, we just fed Codex the forms, along with the UI design and the legal requirements and it spat it out in 1 hour. Was it perfect? No. But our iterative loop became make the web app, show it to end users and then incorporate feedback and completely cut out the UX team, product etc. We were able to complete the conversion in 2 weeks with one guy (something like 150+ government forms/applications). For most simple to medium corporate development work it’s basically over.

▲jr3592 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We're in a similar boat. Entire eng team went full AI about a year ago, and honestly we're struggling to find things to do. Features that would take weeks, take minutes.

I just don't see how we keep going like this without layoffs. The company cannot responsibly continue paying for this many engineers, when half, or less, could do the same job.

▲creata 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Serious question from a consumer of software: if software can be improved so effortlessly now, why isn't it getting better?

Like, why is it all still so buggy? Why does no website seem to consider 96 PPI displays in its design? Why don't we have ostensibly useful features like undo trees everywhere? Why is everything still a RAM hog? Why does the proportion of websites that pay no heed to accessibility seem to be going up rather than down?

I'm told we're living in the future, but it sure doesn't feel like it.

▲jr3592 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

For the same reason that increasing headcount never really solved the bug problem.

Flawless software isn't the goal, ever. Feature development is almost always the primary goal, and fixing bugs and performance issues is only done if the bug is bad enough.

▲creata 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't think you're wrong overall, and it jives with tripleee's reply, but I don't think wanting end-user software to be less buggy than it currently is is asking for "flawless" software.

▲tripleee 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because those don't increase business revenue. People aren't making their buying decisions off that

▲copperx 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because it hasn't been that long since the November singularity.

▲win311fwg 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> why isn't it getting better?

Lack of information. When you are on the building side you become blind to its faults. Consumers almost never tell you what isn't good about it.

> why is it all still so buggy?

Also lack of information. I haven't seen any bugs in years in the things I've worked on. LLMs have closed every last obvious testing gap, squashing any outstanding bugs there. That's not to say it is all bug-free now, but what bugs users may be experiencing aren't being reported.

AI is good at building software, but it is still not good at consuming software like actual consumers do.

▲gopher_space 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If your company isn't throwing you into R&D right now everyone is looking at layoffs. You are no longer in an environment where doing "the same job" will keep you afloat.

▲win311fwg 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> honestly we're struggling to find things to do.

I have been the lone developer on a project for quite some time and was already feeling that way. Yet, recently found out that a second is being added to the team and a third is to come. I guess I'll enjoy what is effectively a paid vacation before it all comes crumbling down.

▲bushbaba 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You'll need less people but not no people.

▲dyauspitr 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, probably 10% of our current workforce is all that’s needed.

▲bushbaba 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You could argue this was true prior to AI. A lot of the workforce is doing questionable value bureaucracy