| ▲ | anal_reactor 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The core issue is that on one hand, police needs power to protect the citizens, but at the same time the power might corrupt them. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | echelon 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is why state powers need judicial oversight. There are some instances where powers need to be exercised in a hurry, but there should always be proper reporting and a paper trail, with stiff reprimanded for misuse or abuse of the system. Accidents can happen, but they should be infrequent and should follow protocol. It would be great if citizens had more direct involvement in these cases too. I don't see why egregious abuses shouldn't be tried by jury. Police and intelligence agency employees should be held to a higher standard than civilians (like military personnel are subject to UCMJ), and breeches of protocols should lead to harsher punishments imposed upon them. It would be fine to pay them more if it required more training and accountability. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pstuart an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> police needs power to protect the citizens Those terms need to be clearly defined. SCOTUS has declared that the police actually have no duty to protect and to serve the people. And with an overwhelming amount of evidence, the police operate with effectively no accountability and repeated demonstrate that they abuse their powers freely. So yes, laws without teeth are pointless but the state's monopoly on violence should only be granted when it can be demonstrated to not be abused. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||