| ▲ | vb-8448 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's even worse, we are crossing over into the realm of religion. The article against GML 5.3 is the equivalent of a Papal excommunication. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | zone411 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The article presented facts and data. If that's a problem for you, that sounds more faith-based than whatever Anthropic is doing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | verdverm 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
which article? have not seen this one --- maybe it's this Anthropic post on GLM? https://www.anthropic.com/research/glm-5-3-and-the-spread-of... > Governments should conduct safety testing on sufficiently capable AI models, including successors to GLM-5.3. Without high-quality evaluations from independent sources, the impact of these capabilities might not become fully clear to model developers until it is too late. As AI developers across the world build increasingly capable open-weight models, we hope they work to appropriately safeguard these capabilities and prevent misuse. I for one do not think my government is up to the task of designing or implementing such a system | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||