which article? have not seen this one

---

maybe it's this Anthropic post on GLM?

https://www.anthropic.com/research/glm-5-3-and-the-spread-of...

> Governments should conduct safety testing on sufficiently capable AI models, including successors to GLM-5.3. Without high-quality evaluations from independent sources, the impact of these capabilities might not become fully clear to model developers until it is too late. As AI developers across the world build increasingly capable open-weight models, we hope they work to appropriately safeguard these capabilities and prevent misuse.

I for one do not think my government is up to the task of designing or implementing such a system

https://www.anthropic.com/research/glm-5-3-and-the-spread-of...

It doesn't need to. It can use your cash to pay the people who are. Those in power like it more that way.

You say that because the 'most' existing models have done is hack governments and companies. Can't you think of worse things a model could do; accidentally or by instruction?