Out of curiosity, why do you think you know that?

raincole an hour ago | parent | next [-]

For reasons, but the main one is that the author stated that they and their attorneys have seriously explored this case and reached this conclusion.

▲

binlog an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/civil-lawsuit/statute-limitat...

> Breach of a written contract: 4 years from the date the contract was broken.

Which part do you think is debatable?

▲

piotrkaminski an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This part:

> Sometimes, if the problem (like the injury or damage) was not discovered right away, the statute of limitations generally starts counting from the date the problem was discovered or should reasonably have been discovered, whichever comes first.

	▲	an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

raldi an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure; I didn't go to law school.

	▲	binlog an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The lawyers representing the author did, and came to this exact conclusion.