> Breach of a written contract: 4 years from the date the contract was broken.

Which part do you think is debatable?

piotrkaminski 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This part:

> Sometimes, if the problem (like the injury or damage) was not discovered right away, the statute of limitations generally starts counting from the date the problem was discovered or should reasonably have been discovered, whichever comes first.

	▲	binlog an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The problem should reasonably have been discovered when they signed the contract and it wasn’t fulfilled. No new information has come to light in the 30 years since.
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]

▲

raldi 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure; I didn't go to law school.

	▲	binlog 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The lawyers representing the author did, and came to this exact conclusion.