| ▲ | criddell 2 hours ago |
| She’s a great writer. A lot of people owe this family an apology. Here’s a sampling of some of the vile comments left on Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1wpll52/clip_of_a_... |
|
| ▲ | Rzor 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think some of them caught wind of their shit-posting and started deleting their comments. Hopefully they learn something. https://archive.is/MlgWh |
|
| ▲ | mahboi 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Some of them would read this and still complain. There's no use in trying to please some very unhappy and likely single people online. |
|
| ▲ | poly2it 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wow, Reddit is horrible. Atrocious behavior. Leave your brains in the anteroom! > Whoever sees this and it reminds them of their current relationship, DUMP HIM > you can tell by the body language, lack of initiative, and lack of joy and welcome-ness for his woman and baby to be back, everything you need to know. > There is a VERY good chance that when he realizes he went viral for being the *Poster Manchild* of taking your spouse for granted, of choosing to act like a parasitic blob Modern Reddit provides a simulacrum of commentary. There are posts and people discusing these posts, but nobody understands or wants to know anything about the underlying topic. The lack of comprehension is crucial to the community. |
| |
| ▲ | tsol 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Its unfortunate because it's not only one of the things that makes social media toxic, but it also makes it less and less like reality. Which in turn pushes away people who have more "normal" views, thereby making the community even more extreme over time. Ask a random person in the street and they might say they think he should help her, but they wouldn't come up with these detailed narratives about abuse and manipulation. That kind of reaction is characteristic of social media and the more I see it the less I want to spend time online with those kinds of people | |
| ▲ | shakow an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > and lack of joy and welcome-ness for his woman and baby to be back Damn, do these people really jump out of joy whenever their SO, parent, child, friend, or whoever comes back after a 10' chore? Life is not a movie, “coming back” is a dozen-times-of-day occurrence, no one will cheer you back from the toilets. |
|
|
| ▲ | Tiberium 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If "she" refers to the LLM used by the author, sure. (The article is clearly mostly LLM-written/assisted) |
| |
| ▲ | jryle70 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | In a way, this comment precisely demonstrates the kind of vitriol responses that the article talks about -- witch hunt without evidence, going with the trend, herd mentality. | | | |
| ▲ | coherentpony 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I read it and didn’t get that impression. Perhaps you could endow your claim with some evidence. | |
| ▲ | Wistar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Hmm. Pangram AI detection says the piece is “100% human written.” | | |
| ▲ | randallsquared an hour ago | parent [-] | | Really? A comment in another thread says Pangram says it's 100% AI. I just checked with the free plan, and it told me 29% AI. What I'm learning here is that Pangram may not be a reliable checker. Thing is, I also twigged it as heavily LLM written when I read it, so. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | | |
| ▲ | Wistar 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I checked again with a longer sample—the first eight paragraphs—and, this time, Pangram said 61% human. Hmm. I think your twigging may be more accurate. | |
| ▲ | senderista 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I got the vibe that maybe an LLM was used for editing but the stench wasn't overwhelming. |
|
| |
| ▲ | macintux 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Isn't this story pretty much all about jumping to conclusions and pissing on people who you don't know? | |
| ▲ | grvdrm 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Amused by a claim about writing composition that uses “clearly mostly” back to back. | | |
| ▲ | Planktonne 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's a legitimate usage of both words. | | |
| ▲ | RugnirViking 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | there are higher levels of writing than "grammatically correct"... we don't dismiss claims of poorly written code with "but it compiles!" |
|
| |
| ▲ | godwinson__4-8 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Based on what? | |
| ▲ | mindslight 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Even if so, this would seem to be a positive use of LLMs. Something traumatic happened, and she wants to put her perspective into the public dialog rather than continuing to be a passive subject of the social media industry's two minute hate. I know in such a position I myself would be at a loss for words, with the perfect being the enemy of the good enough. | |
| ▲ | physicalecon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|