| ▲ | randallsquared an hour ago | |
Really? A comment in another thread says Pangram says it's 100% AI. I just checked with the free plan, and it told me 29% AI. What I'm learning here is that Pangram may not be a reliable checker. Thing is, I also twigged it as heavily LLM written when I read it, so. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | ||
| ▲ | Wistar 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I checked again with a longer sample—the first eight paragraphs—and, this time, Pangram said 61% human. Hmm. I think your twigging may be more accurate. | ||
| ▲ | senderista 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I got the vibe that maybe an LLM was used for editing but the stench wasn't overwhelming. | ||