| ▲ | faangguyindia 7 hours ago |
| Our app has 17,000+ users and has never paid a cent to Google :)
With a little out of box thinking, you can avoid Google tax. |
|
| ▲ | buf 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| How do you do it? |
| |
| ▲ | faangguyindia 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Very easy: offer them a long trial (numbers will show that your revenue is hurt, but don't care). Eventually the trail runs out, and they search how to renew or they ask support. The first result appears: your payment subscription page. If a customer has used your product already for long time 20 days+, extra steps to set up payment one time, especially when you do not auto charge short trials, the customer is happy. | | |
| ▲ | em-bee 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | so you offer a free trial on google play that is long enough to get people hooked. but there is no paid app on google play. instead people have to pay through other means to unlock the app? |
| |
| ▲ | atraac 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They push the user to their website where subscriptions are. |
|
|
| ▲ | philipallstar 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's not a tax. It's you being parasitic on someone else's infra. |
| |
| ▲ | pmlnr an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Given what google search/AI/data tracking is, there should be no shame in using their infra for free. Hell,it should all be free by default. | |
| ▲ | mitxela 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | it's actually Google being parasitic on all the apps' infra. I paid for the app store infra when I bought my phone, and every time I open it and see ads, and with my tracking data for the NSA. They don't need to be allowed to quadruple dip. | | | |
| ▲ | moooo99 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Good thing the companies that participate in the current AI craze would never ever behave in any way parasitic. | | |
| ▲ | philipallstar 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Whataboutism is just so pointless. | | |
| ▲ | moooo99 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | pointless, yes. Entertaining, also yes. Regardless of my whataboutism, I still think tax is an very apt description of what the Google Play and App Store fees effectively represent. I would be happy to call it a fee if the stores would actually allow effective competition. But as it stands right now, the "government" like behaviours make the wording tax fairly accurate. | | |
|
|
|
