I don't have exact numbers for what "a reasonable level" is off hand, but "a heck of a lot lower than now" would be a great start.

Again, the onus is on you to describe a mechanism by which abolishing most forms of taxes will drastically reduce wealth discrepancy. I'm not arguing against LVT, you're the one who's arguing against everything that's not LVT.

▲

kjshsh123 a day ago | parent [-]

Tell me where I argued against everything that's not LVT lol

Again strawman and false dichotomy.

I can't help if you think LVT wouldn't reduce the disparity sufficiently. I'm saying that it's possible it does. I outlined the process how. You don't accept it that's fine. But I do think a big LVT would make a heck of a difference.

Again, that doesn't mean I'm against every and any other tax that could also make a difference.

	▲	mort96 a day ago \| parent [-]
		You were trying to argue in favour of Georgeism weren't you? If not .... what point are you trying to make exactly?