| ▲ | kjshsh123 3 hours ago | |
Tell me where I argued against everything that's not LVT lol Again strawman and false dichotomy. I can't help if you think LVT wouldn't reduce the disparity sufficiently. I'm saying that it's possible it does. I outlined the process how. You don't accept it that's fine. But I do think a big LVT would make a heck of a difference. Again, that doesn't mean I'm against every and any other tax that could also make a difference. | ||